Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.34
NAS:AEHR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
79% of the 848 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.76 vs. NAS:AEHR: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NAS:AEHR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: 0.34
Equity-to-Asset 0.11
NAS:AEHR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
96% of the 844 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.63 vs. NAS:AEHR: 0.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NAS:AEHR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.07  Med: 0.79 Max: 0.93
Current: 0.11
-0.07
0.93
Piotroski F-Score: 2
Altman Z-Score: -3.02
Beneish M-Score: -3.23
WACC vs ROIC
4.41%
-159.80%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 2/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -52.15
NAS:AEHR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
94% of the 849 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 5.48 vs. NAS:AEHR: -52.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NAS:AEHR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -119  Med: -24.55 Max: 14.88
Current: -52.15
-119
14.88
Net Margin % -57.41
NAS:AEHR's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
94% of the 849 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 3.98 vs. NAS:AEHR: -57.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NAS:AEHR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -140.01  Med: -21.29 Max: 27.08
Current: -57.41
-140.01
27.08
ROE % -705.98
NAS:AEHR's ROE % is ranked lower than
100% of the 828 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 4.85 vs. NAS:AEHR: -705.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NAS:AEHR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -351.1  Med: -38.39 Max: 34.99
Current: -705.98
-351.1
34.99
ROA % -64.97
NAS:AEHR's ROA % is ranked lower than
97% of the 856 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 2.71 vs. NAS:AEHR: -64.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NAS:AEHR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -101.41  Med: -27.07 Max: 28.62
Current: -64.97
-101.41
28.62
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -159.32
NAS:AEHR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
94% of the 853 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 9.85 vs. NAS:AEHR: -159.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NAS:AEHR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -198.47  Med: -64.7 Max: 35.76
Current: -159.32
-198.47
35.76
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -13.80
NAS:AEHR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
85% of the 734 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 2.40 vs. NAS:AEHR: -13.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NAS:AEHR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.1  Med: -12.1 Max: 28.4
Current: -13.8
-30.1
28.4
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 13.00
NAS:AEHR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
61% of the 563 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. NAS:AEHR: 13.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NAS:AEHR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -52.1  Med: 7.35 Max: 240.6
Current: 13
-52.1
240.6
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 13.00
NAS:AEHR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
61% of the 513 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 3.90 vs. NAS:AEHR: 13.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NAS:AEHR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -52.5  Med: 13.05 Max: 81.7
Current: 13
-52.5
81.7
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Aehr Test Systems $NAS:AEHR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NAS:AEHR's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-09-29 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

AEHR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 74,600 sh (-11.30%)
» More
Q3 2016

AEHR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 69,900 sh (-6.30%)
» More
Q4 2016

AEHR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 75,100 sh (+7.44%)
» More
Q1 2017

AEHR Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Jim Simons 68,000 sh (-9.45%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with AEHR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Semiconductors » Semiconductor Equipment & Materials    NAICS: 334515    SIC: 3825
Compare:AMEX:EMAN, NAS:ENPH, NAS:ATOM, NAS:IMI, NAS:ASYS, NAS:RBCN, OTCPK:MPAD, NAS:SCON, AMEX:TRT, OTCPK:SODI, OTCPK:STRI, NAS:AXTI, NYSE:PKE, NAS:COHU, NAS:XCRA, NAS:ICHR, NAS:ACLS, NAS:NANO, NAS:PLAB, NAS:UCTT » details
Traded in other countries:AYB.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Aehr Test Systems is engaged in the designing, manufacturing and marketing of test and burn-in products to the semiconductor manufacturing industry in several geographic areas.

Aehr Test Systems was incorporated in the state of California on May 25, 1977. It manufactures and sells systems, which are designed to reduce the cost of testing flash, dynamic random access memory, and other memory devices, and to perform reliability screening or burn-in of complex logic and memory devices. These systems can be used to simultaneously perform parallel testing and burn- of packaged integrated circuits, singulated bare die, or ICs still in wafer form. As a long- time provider of burn- in equipment, with over 2,500 systems installed worldwide, the company has developed and introduced several product families, including the FOXTM, MTX and MAX systems, and the DiePakR carrier. The FOX system is a full wafer contact parallel test and burn-in system designed to make contact with all pads of a wafer simultaneously, thus enabling full wafer parallel test and burn-in. The MTX system is a massively parallel test system designed to reduce the cost of memory testing by performing both test and burn-in on thousands of devices simultaneously. The MTX system consists of several subsystems: pattern generation and test electronics, control software, network interface and environmental chamber. The MAX system can effectively burn-in and functionally test complex devices, such as digital signal processors, microprocessors, microcontrollers and systems-on-a-chip. The MTX massively parallel test system is designed to reduce the cost of memory testing by processing thousands of memory devices simultaneously, including flash memories, DRAMs and other memories. The DiePak carrier is a reusable, temporary package that enables IC manufacturers to perform cost-effective final test and burn-in of bare die. The company manufactures and markets massively parallel test systems, monitored burn-in systems, full wafer contact systems, die carriers, test fixtures and related accessories. The company markets and sells its products throughout the world to semiconductor manufacturers, semiconductor contract assemblers, electronics manufacturers and burn-in and test service companies. The company has sales and service operations in the United States, Japan, Germany and Taiwan. The Company assembles its products from components and parts manufactured by others, including environmental chambers, power supplies, metal fabrications, printed circuit assemblies, ICs, burn-in sockets, high-density interconnects, wafer contactors and interconnect substrates.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 51.27
AEHR's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
100% of the 825 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.88 vs. AEHR: 51.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
AEHR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 2.03 Max: 66.33
Current: 51.27
0.3
66.33
PS Ratio 4.30
AEHR's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
78% of the 832 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.75 vs. AEHR: 4.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
AEHR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 1.53 Max: 5.56
Current: 4.3
0.24
5.56
EV-to-EBIT -12.54
AEHR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 583 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 18.38 vs. AEHR: -12.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
AEHR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -94.7  Med: -2.4 Max: 87.2
Current: -12.54
-94.7
87.2
EV-to-EBITDA -13.04
AEHR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 647 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 13.38 vs. AEHR: -13.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
AEHR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -149.8  Med: -2.8 Max: 65.8
Current: -13.04
-149.8
65.8
Current Ratio 2.37
AEHR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
50% of the 850 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 2.39 vs. AEHR: 2.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
AEHR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.64  Med: 4.76 Max: 12.84
Current: 2.37
1.64
12.84
Quick Ratio 0.84
AEHR's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
83% of the 849 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.84 vs. AEHR: 0.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
AEHR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 3.14 Max: 8.76
Current: 0.84
0.37
8.76
Days Inventory 253.44
AEHR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
95% of the 816 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 78.87 vs. AEHR: 253.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
AEHR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 132.49  Med: 219.11 Max: 391.9
Current: 253.44
132.49
391.9
Days Sales Outstanding 42.26
AEHR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
76% of the 771 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 61.39 vs. AEHR: 42.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
AEHR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.14  Med: 54.33 Max: 102.16
Current: 42.26
13.14
102.16
Days Payable 68.44
AEHR's Days Payable is ranked higher than
68% of the 751 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 52.14 vs. AEHR: 68.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
AEHR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.96  Med: 50.59 Max: 72.98
Current: 68.44
17.96
72.98

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -7.60
AEHR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 573 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: -3.30 vs. AEHR: -7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
AEHR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.4  Med: -2.4 Max: -1
Current: -7.6
-15.4
-1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 202.50
AEHR's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
99% of the 574 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 4.56 vs. AEHR: 202.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
AEHR' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.52  Med: 1.58 Max: 262
Current: 202.5
0.52
262
Price-to-Tangible-Book 51.27
AEHR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
99% of the 796 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 2.05 vs. AEHR: 51.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
AEHR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 1.36 Max: 66.33
Current: 51.27
0.46
66.33
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 2.81
AEHR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
93% of the 805 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. AEHR: 2.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
AEHR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.99 Max: 3.64
Current: 2.81
0.2
3.64
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -7.97
AEHR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
84% of the 852 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 3.30 vs. AEHR: -7.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
AEHR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -53170.3  Med: -19.4 Max: 41416.8
Current: -7.97
-53170.3
41416.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $13.79
EPS (TTM) $ -0.54
Beta0.28
Short Percentage of Float3.28%
52-Week Range $1.58 - 6.10
Shares Outstanding (Mil)21.21
» More Articles for NAS:AEHR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Aehr Test Systems Receives Follow-On Order in Excess of $3.8 Million for Multiple ABTS™ Burn-In Jul 12 2017 
Aehr Test Systems to Announce Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2017 Financial Results on July 19, 2017 Jul 11 2017 
Aehr Test Systems to Participate in CEO Investor Summit 2017 in San Francisco July 12 Jul 10 2017 
Aehr Test Systems to Showcase its FOX-XP™ Next Generation Test and Burn-in Systems at SEMICON W Jul 10 2017 
Aehr Test Systems to Participate at the Craig-Hallum Institutional Investor Conference in Minneapoli May 25 2017 
Aehr Test Systems Announces $1.9 Million in Follow-On Orders for Multiple ABTS™ Burn-In and Tes May 08 2017 
Aehr Test Systems Announces Underwriter’s Exercise of Over-allotment Option in Public Offering Apr 17 2017 
Aehr Test Systems Announces Pricing of Public Offering of Common Stock Apr 13 2017 
Aehr Test Systems Announces Proposed Public Offering of Common Stock Apr 10 2017 
Aehr Test Systems Receives Initial Production Order for Proprietary ABTSTM Burn-In and Test Syste Apr 06 2017 

More From Other Websites
Earnings Review and Free Research Report: ASML’s Revenue Soared 20.7%; EPS Surged 30.1% Jul 21 2017
Aehr Test Systems Reports 30% Revenue Growth for Fiscal Year 2017 and Provides Financial Guidance... Jul 19 2017
Investor Network: AEHR TEST SYSTEMS to Host Earnings Call Jul 19 2017
Aehr Test Systems Receives Follow-On Order in Excess of $3.8 Million for Multiple ABTS™ Burn-In... Jul 12 2017
Aehr Test Systems to Announce Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2017 Financial Results on July 19, 2017 Jul 11 2017
Aehr Test Systems to Participate in CEO Investor Summit 2017 in San Francisco July 12 Jul 10 2017
Aehr Test Systems to Showcase its FOX-XP™ Next Generation Test and Burn-in Systems at SEMICON West... Jul 10 2017
Aehr Test Systems Added to Russell Microcap Index Jun 26 2017
Aehr Test Systems to Participate at the Craig-Hallum Institutional Investor Conference in... May 25 2017
Aehr Test Systems Announces $1.9 Million in Follow-On Orders for Multiple ABTS™ Burn-In and Test... May 08 2017
ETFs with exposure to Aehr Test Systems : April 12, 2017 Apr 12 2017
Aehr Test Systems :AEHR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2017 By the Numbers : April 11, 2017 Apr 11 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}