Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt No Debt
ENG's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
79% of the 1031 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. ENG: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
ENG' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.06 Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity-to-Asset 0.85
ENG's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
96% of the 1007 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. ENG: 0.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
ENG' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.54 Max: 0.85
Current: 0.85
0.31
0.85
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 5.00
Beneish M-Score: -3.64
WACC vs ROIC
16.13%
-10.03%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -5.62
ENG's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
88% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.01 vs. ENG: -5.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
ENG' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.25  Med: 0.21 Max: 6.41
Current: -5.62
-9.25
6.41
Net Margin % -4.34
ENG's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
86% of the 1021 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.42 vs. ENG: -4.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
ENG' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.74  Med: -0.71 Max: 13.24
Current: -4.34
-14.74
13.24
ROE % -6.61
ENG's ROE % is ranked lower than
86% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.81 vs. ENG: -6.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
ENG' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -80.19  Med: -2.26 Max: 30.52
Current: -6.61
-80.19
30.52
ROA % -5.28
ENG's ROA % is ranked lower than
89% of the 1038 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.13 vs. ENG: -5.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
ENG' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -36.75  Med: -1.93 Max: 20.29
Current: -5.28
-36.75
20.29
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -34.03
ENG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
93% of the 1030 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.74 vs. ENG: -34.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
ENG' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -47.6  Med: 1.39 Max: 53.94
Current: -34.03
-47.6
53.94
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -30.00
ENG's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
92% of the 845 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.70 vs. ENG: -30.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
ENG' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.7  Med: 18.4 Max: 62.1
Current: -30
-30.7
62.1
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with ENGlobal Corp $ENG.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» ENG's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-04 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

ENG Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 311,900 sh (+4.42%)
» More
Q3 2016

ENG Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 340,628 sh (+9.21%)
» More
Q4 2016

ENG Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 417,630 sh (+22.61%)
» More
Q1 2017

ENG Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Jim Simons 509,323 sh (+21.96%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ENG

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction    NAICS: 541330    SIC: 8711
Compare:OTCPK:ESOA, AMEX:VSR, OTCPK:ETOLF, OTCPK:ICAYY, OTCPK:SFHI, NAS:RCMT, OTCPK:ATRM, OTCPK:TSSI, NAS:LMB, AMEX:GV, NAS:LAYN, NYSE:ORN, NAS:GLDD, NAS:STRL, NAS:WLDN, NYSE:AMRC, NAS:IESC, NAS:NVEE, NYSE:GRAM, OTCPK:DRTTF » details
Traded in other countries:4EG.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
ENGlobal Corp is a provider of engineering and other professional project services related to design, fabrication, procurement, maintenance, environmental and other governmental compliance and construction management.

ENGlobal Corp was incorporated in the State of Nevada in June 1994. The Company is a provider of engineering and other professional project services related to design, fabrication, procurement, maintenance, environmental and other governmental compliance and construction management, mainly with respect to energy sector infrastructure facilities throughout the United States. The Company's segments include; Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management Segment and Automation Segment. The Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management or EPCM segment provides services relating to the development, management and execution of projects requiring professional engineering and related project services to the energy industry in the United States. Services provided by the EPCM segment include feasibility studies, engineering, design, procurement and construction management. The EPCM segment includes the government services group, which provides engineering, design, installation and operation and maintenance of various government, public sector and international facilities. The Automation segment provides services related to the design, fabrication and implementation of process distributed control and analyzer systems, advanced automation, information technology and electrical projects primarily to the energy industry throughout the United States as well as projects in the Middle East and Central Asia. The Company serve to 500 companies in the energy industry. It competes with public and private firms of various sizes, in the industry which it operates. The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to various foreign, federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to its business and operations, and various health and safety regulations established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Top Ranked Articles about ENGlobal Corp

EnerGulf Announces Participation in Gulf of Mexico Projects

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(Marketwired - Jun 9, 2016) - EnerGulf Resources Inc. (TSX VENTURE:ENG)(FRANKFURT:EKS) ("EnerGulf" or the "Company") is pleased to announce a signed Letter of Intent to acquire certain interests in offshore Gulf of Mexico oil and gas prospects, as well as provide a Company update. Gulf of Mexico - Acquisition of Rights
EnerGulf entered into a letter of intent ("LOI") with Texas South Energy, Inc. (OTCBB:TXSO) ("Texas South") to participate in six offshore Gulf of Mexico prospects owned and operated by GulfSlope Energy Inc. ("GulfSlope") (OTCBB:GSPE). Subject to the execution of definitive agreements and the Company's financial obligations therein, the LOI provides for participation by the Company in drilling one well on Block 378, Vermilion Area, South Addition ("Canoe Prospect") and a second well on either the Canoe Prospect or Block 375, Vermilion Area, South Addition ("Selectron Shallow Prospect"). The Company has made a US$200,000 payment for its interest in the Canoe Prospect. On June 27, 2016, the Company will pay an additional US$200,000 for its interest in the Selectron Shallow Prospect. Upon payment, the Company will own a 43.75% non-operated working interest and will have certain cost interest obligations in the Canoe and Selectron Shallow Prospects. The LOI also provides for the payment of US$400,000 on June 27, 2016 for the acquisition of an undivided 25% non-operated working interest in the following sub salt prospects: Block 870, Ewing Bank and Block 914, Ewing Bank ("Alpha Prospect"); Block 904, Ewing Bank and Block 948, Ewing Bank ("Beta Prospect"); Block 348, Ship Shoal, South Addition ("Baryon Prospect"); and Block 371, Eugene Island, South Addition ("Proton Prospect"). All blocks are operated by GulfSlope. As additional consideration, EnerGulf has agreed as a term of the definitive agreement to issue to Texas South a warrant to purchase up to 7,000,000 common shares of EnerGulf exercisable for a three year term at a price of CDN$0.06 per share. If EnerGulf fails to meet any payment obligation under the LOI, it will lose the right to participate in the prospect to which such non-payment applies. Furthermore, its participation right in any funded prospects will be reduced proportionately based on the actual payments made relative to the total payment obligations under the LOI. Texas South (OTCBB:TXSO) is a Houston based oil and gas exploration company with interests in the US Gulf of Mexico. GulfSlope (OTCBB:GSPE), also based in Houston, is an exploration company focused on the Gulf of Mexico under the leadership of its Chairman and CEO, John Seitz, the former President and CEO of Anadarko Petroleum. Albania - Block 8 EnerGulf has been issued a Production Sharing Agreement ("PSA") for Block 8 in the Republic of Albania. The Company will evaluate the optimal development strategy for the Block. Block 8 is one of the largest oil and gas blocks in the Republic of Albania, a member of NATO and an official candidate for membership in the European Union. The Company also acquired various chromite properties in Albania and is currently evaluating its strategic options. Namibia - Block 1711 EnerGulf is awaiting the 3D program required of the operator and remains committed to the very prospective block. Lotshi Block (Democratic Republic of Congo "DRC") EnerGulf intends to seek a further extension of the Lotshi Block Production Sharing Contract with the government of the DRC. The Company remains committed to the DRC and the Block's potential in the face of current industry difficulties. Addition of Advisors
In connection with the Gulf of Mexico acquisition, EnerGulf has named John B. Connally III and James M. Askew as Advisors to the company. Mr. Connally, a Houston, Texas based independent energy investor, is a former partner of the law firm Baker Botts in Houston, Texas specializing in corporate finance transactions in the oil and gas sector. Mr. Connally has participated in founding various oil and gas ventures. He served as a founding director of Nuevo Energy and was a founding director and former CEO of both Pure Energy Group, Inc. and Pure Gas Partners. Mr. Connally currently serves as Chairman of the Lt. Governor's Energy Advisory Board in Texas. Mr. Askew is a Houston, Texas based independent oil and gas investor. He is a co-founder and formerly served as EnerGulf's President and as a Director. He is also a founder, Chairman of the Board, President and CEO of Texas South and is a founder, former President and former Director of GulfSlope. Mr. Askew has been active as an investor and entrepreneur in oil and gas projects for over 20 years. Debt Settlement with Columbus Gold The Company has entered into a debt settlement agreement dated June 1, 2016 for the settlement of existing debt in the amount of CDN$50,925 owed to Columbus Gold Corp. ("Columbus"), a company that provided head office and management services to EnerGulf until May 31, 2016. Under the settlement agreement, half of the debt was forgiven and cancelled, and subject to acceptance by the TSX Venture Exchange, the remaining half will be exchanged for common shares of the Company at a price of CDN$0.05 per share, for an aggregate issuance of 509,250 common shares to Columbus. The shares will be subject to a four-month hold period. About EnerGulf EnerGulf is a publicly traded international oil and gas exploration company with property interests located in the Gulf of Mexico, Democratic Republic of Congo, the Republic of Namibia and the Republic of Albania. On Behalf of the Board of EnerGulf "Ernest B. Miller IV" Ernest B. Miller IV, CEO Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
This release may include certain forward-looking information and statements, as defined by law including without limitation Canadian securities laws and the "safe harbor" provisions of the US Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("forward-looking statements"). In particular, and without limitation this news release contains forward-looking statements respecting the Company's proposed entry into a definitive agreement with Texso for the purchase by the Company of a portion of the drilling rights to be acquired by Texso from GulfSlope and the consideration to be included therein; the Company's intention to seek an extension of the Lotshi Block Production Sharing Contract; completion of the proposed shares-for debt settlement with Columbus, which is subject to acceptance by the TSX Venture Exchange; the future prospects for the Company; management's beliefs, assumptions and expectations; and general business and economic conditions. Forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, including without limitation assumptions about the following: Texso's ability to complete the acquisition of certain drilling rights to concerning the Canoe and the Selectron Prospects from GulfSlope; the ability by EnerGulf to thereafter complete a definitive agreement with Texso; the time frame within which a development strategy will be determined for Block 8 in the Republic of Albania, and the associated costs, permitting, and other requirements being met, if at all; the expectation that the Democratic Republic of Congo will be willing to entertain negotiations as to the extension of the Lotshi Block and that an extension can be agreed upon on terms that are acceptable to EnerGulf; the Company's ability to raise sufficient capital to carry out its goals and objectives; changes in the business or prospects of the company; unforeseen circumstances; general business and economic conditions, including those impacting the oil and gas industry and the global economy as a whole; and ongoing relations with employees, consultants, partners and joint venturers. The foregoing list is not exhaustive and we undertake no obligation to update any of the foregoing except as required by law.





EnerGulf Resources Inc.
Jonathan Buick
The Buick Group
416-915-0915
[email protected]




Read more...
EnerGulf Appoints New Management Team

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(Marketwired - Jun 6, 2016) - EnerGulf Resources Inc. (TSX VENTURE:ENG)(FRANKFURT:EKS) ("EnerGulf" or the "Company") has named Ernest B. Miller IV, of Houston, Texas, as its President and Chief Executive Officer and Clive Brookes as its Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Miller and Mr. Brookes have also joined the Company's Board of Directors effective immediately. Mr. Miller, a seasoned energy sector executive, has overseen the development of projects in West Africa, South America, and the United States. "I believe that we can bring transformational opportunities to EnerGulf that will position the Company for rapid future growth, bringing outstanding value to our shareholders. I am excited for this opportunity," said Mr. Miller. Clive Brookes has also re-joined EnerGulf as a Director, in addition to assuming the role of Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Brookes previously served as a director and was the CFO of EnerGulf from 2008 to 2014. Mr. Miller takes over from John D. Elmore who has resigned as Director and President of EnerGulf and all related entities. Mr. Brookes assumes the position of Chief Financial Officer from Akbar Hassanally who left the Company to pursue other interests. Jenna Virk has also resigned as Corporate Secretary effective immediately. The Company thanks Mr. Elmore for his dedication and service during his tenure with EnerGulf, and thanks Mr. Hassanally and Ms. Virk for their time and efforts. The Company is also reviewing US domestic opportunities and will provide further updates as events unfold. About EnerGulf EnerGulf is a publicly traded international oil and gas exploration company with property interests located in the Republic of Namibia, Democratic Republic of Congo, and the Republic of Albania. On Behalf of the Board of EnerGulf, Jeff Greenblum, Chairman Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.





EnerGulf Resources Inc.
Jonathan Buick
The Buick Group
416-915-0915
[email protected]
www.energulf.com




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 11.02
ENG's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
83% of the 491 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 13.16 vs. ENG: 11.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
ENG' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.19  Med: 10.85 Max: 164.86
Current: 11.02
2.19
164.86
PB Ratio 0.98
ENG's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 1003 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. ENG: 0.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
ENG' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 1.38 Max: 7.48
Current: 0.98
0.3
7.48
PS Ratio 0.63
ENG's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
59% of the 982 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. ENG: 0.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
ENG' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.33 Max: 1.35
Current: 0.63
0.03
1.35
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 9.29
ENG's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
75% of the 352 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.14 vs. ENG: 9.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
ENG' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.5  Med: 10.71 Max: 259.52
Current: 9.29
2.5
259.52
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 8.39
ENG's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
69% of the 448 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.07 vs. ENG: 8.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
ENG' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.34  Med: 8.73 Max: 93.16
Current: 8.39
2.34
93.16
Current Ratio 4.24
ENG's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
93% of the 957 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. ENG: 4.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ENG' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.25  Med: 1.95 Max: 4.24
Current: 4.24
1.25
4.24
Quick Ratio 4.24
ENG's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
94% of the 957 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. ENG: 4.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ENG' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.25  Med: 1.86 Max: 4.24
Current: 4.24
1.25
4.24
Days Sales Outstanding 51.21
ENG's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
70% of the 742 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 72.76 vs. ENG: 51.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ENG' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 47.62  Med: 67.65 Max: 101.57
Current: 51.21
47.62
101.57
Days Payable 14.85
ENG's Days Payable is ranked lower than
85% of the 657 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 82.51 vs. ENG: 14.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ENG' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.64  Med: 17.26 Max: 25.31
Current: 14.85
9.64
25.31

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 70.00
ENG's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
100% of the 1369 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. ENG: 70.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
ENG' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 0
Current: 70
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.10
ENG's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
71% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -2.30 vs. ENG: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ENG' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.9  Med: -1.1 Max: 0.6
Current: -0.1
-22.9
0.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Cash 4.81
ENG's Price-to-Net-Cash is ranked higher than
58% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.35 vs. ENG: 4.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Cash only.
ENG' s Price-to-Net-Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.81  Med: 7.41 Max: 10
Current: 4.81
4.81
10
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 1.73
ENG's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked higher than
62% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.11 vs. ENG: 1.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
ENG' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.89  Med: 3.36 Max: 188
Current: 1.73
0.89
188
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.07
ENG's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
50% of the 913 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.47 vs. ENG: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
ENG' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.67  Med: 3.22 Max: 445
Current: 1.07
0.67
445
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.78
ENG's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
65% of the 472 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. ENG: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
ENG' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 1.17 Max: 57.7
Current: 0.78
0.26
57.7
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.91
ENG's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
93% of the 840 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. ENG: 1.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
ENG' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 1.38 Max: 23.23
Current: 1.91
0.15
23.23
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -14.81
ENG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
91% of the 1251 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.84 vs. ENG: -14.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
ENG' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.81  Med: 8 Max: 31.9
Current: -14.81
-14.81
31.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 22.24
ENG's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
75% of the 495 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.44 vs. ENG: 22.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
ENG' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.8  Med: 14.65 Max: 80
Current: 22.24
-3.8
80

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $56.89
EPS (TTM) $ -0.08
Beta2.12
Short Percentage of Float0.14%
52-Week Range $0.97 - 3.10
Shares Outstanding (Mil)27.14
» More Articles for ENG

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
EnerGulf Announces Participation in Gulf of Mexico Projects Jun 09 2016 
EnerGulf Appoints New Management Team Jun 06 2016 
EnerGulf Director Resignation Mar 01 2016 
EnerGulf Completes Acquisition of Columbus Copper Oct 02 2015 
Columbus Copper Obtains Final Order for Merger With EnerGulf by Plan of Arrangement Sep 29 2015 
EnerGulf Announces AGM Results and Updates on the Columbus Copper Corporation Acquisition Sep 02 2015 
EnerGulf Resources and Columbus Copper Announce Arrangement Agreement Jul 13 2015 
Reflections from 20 Years of Investing (2001-2008) Pt 2 Jul 05 2013 
June 25, 2010 52-Week Low Wrap-Up: Blackrock, BP Plc, Community Bankers Trust, ENGlobal, First Finan Jun 25 2010 
June 2, 2010 52-Week Low Wrap-Up: Alliant Techsystems Inc., Allied Defense Group, Duff & Phelps, ENG Jun 02 2010 

More From Other Websites
ENGlobal Reports First Quarter 2017 Results May 11 2017
ETFs with exposure to ENGlobal Corp. : April 25, 2017 Apr 25 2017
ENGlobal Wins Modular Environmental Project Mar 21 2017
ENGlobal Corp. :ENG-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : March 17, 2017 Mar 17 2017
ENGlobal Corp. :ENG-US: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : March 16, 2017 Mar 16 2017
ENGlobal Reports Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Results Mar 09 2017
ENGlobal Adds Modular Project Execution Capabilities Mar 01 2017
Energa S.A. -- Moody's affirms ENERGA's Baa1 ratings; stable outlook Feb 09 2017
ENGlobal Corp.: Strong price momentum but will it sustain? Jan 25 2017
ENGlobal Announces Process Analytical Award Valued at $7 million Nov 29 2016
ENGlobal Reports Third Quarter 2016 Results Nov 03 2016
ETF’s with exposure to ENGlobal Corp. : September 30, 2016 Sep 30 2016
ENGlobal Corp. :ENG-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2016 By the Numbers : August 9, 2016 Aug 09 2016
ENGlobal Reports Second Quarter 2016 Results Aug 04 2016
Energa S.A. -- Moody's: Poland's coal-dominated fuel mix expected to remain unchanged until 2021 Jul 19 2016
IP Integrator 8x8 Started At Buy; Can It Gain Share Vs. Bigger Rivals? Jun 30 2016
Energa S.A. -- Moody's: Poland's law on wind farms will hinder growth in renewable energy generation Jun 29 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)