Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 1.24
FLR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
54% of the 1085 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.96 vs. FLR: 1.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
FLR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 4.11 Max: 51.38
Current: 1.24
0.26
51.38
Equity-to-Asset 0.36
FLR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
61% of the 1058 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.43 vs. FLR: 0.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
FLR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.49
Current: 0.36
0.25
0.49
Debt-to-Equity 0.49
FLR's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
53% of the 860 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. FLR: 0.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
FLR' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.15 Max: 0.55
Current: 0.49
0
0.55
Debt-to-EBITDA 2.28
FLR's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
55% of the 855 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.38 vs. FLR: 2.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
FLR' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.42 Max: 2.28
Current: 2.28
0.1
2.28
Interest Coverage 6.55
FLR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
76% of the 918 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 21.04 vs. FLR: 6.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
FLR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.55  Med: 42.62 Max: 111.66
Current: 6.55
6.55
111.66
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 3.96
Beneish M-Score: -2.68
WACC vs ROIC
10.37%
9.48%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 2.35
FLR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
75% of the 1078 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.18 vs. FLR: 2.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
FLR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.35  Med: 4.28 Max: 5.65
Current: 2.35
2.35
5.65
Net Margin % 1.03
FLR's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
76% of the 1081 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.60 vs. FLR: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
FLR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.03  Med: 2.41 Max: 3.23
Current: 1.03
1.03
3.23
ROE % 6.33
FLR's ROE % is ranked lower than
70% of the 1062 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.56 vs. FLR: 6.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
FLR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.33  Med: 16.06 Max: 29.14
Current: 6.33
6.33
29.14
ROA % 2.19
FLR's ROA % is ranked lower than
69% of the 1094 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.13 vs. FLR: 2.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
FLR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.19  Med: 6.84 Max: 11.79
Current: 2.19
2.19
11.79
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 45.30
FLR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
63% of the 1087 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 18.56 vs. FLR: 45.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
FLR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 45.3  Med: 90.83 Max: 142.19
Current: 45.3
45.3
142.19
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -6.70
FLR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
72% of the 952 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. FLR: -6.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
FLR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9  Med: 4.35 Max: 17.4
Current: -6.7
-9
17.4
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -11.40
FLR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
78% of the 826 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.90 vs. FLR: -11.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
FLR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.75 Max: 42.6
Current: -11.4
0
42.6
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -21.00
FLR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
81% of the 778 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.40 vs. FLR: -21.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
FLR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -37.8  Med: 9.7 Max: 62.1
Current: -21
-37.8
62.1
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with Fluor Corp FLR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» FLR's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-02-16)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2016

FLR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 8,700 sh (New)
Paul Singer 37,100 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 7,400 sh (New)
John Rogers 436,266 sh (+61.84%)
Pioneer Investments 769,262 sh (+13.95%)
John Buckingham 75,418 sh (+6.71%)
Ken Fisher 14,055 sh (+1.08%)
Dodge & Cox 7,195 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Alan Fournier Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
David Dreman 222 sh (-95.80%)
» More
Q1 2017

FLR Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Ray Dalio 91,450 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 376,717 sh (New)
John Buckingham 80,370 sh (+6.57%)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,900 sh (+2.30%)
John Rogers 436,266 sh (unchged)
Paul Singer Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
David Dreman Sold Out
Pioneer Investments 767,548 sh (-0.22%)
Ken Fisher 13,572 sh (-3.44%)
Dodge & Cox 6,205 sh (-13.76%)
» More
Q2 2017

FLR Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Jim Simons 150,568 sh (New)
John Rogers 919,193 sh (+110.70%)
Paul Tudor Jones 14,057 sh (+57.94%)
Ken Fisher 14,169 sh (+4.40%)
John Buckingham 83,630 sh (+4.06%)
Dodge & Cox 6,205 sh (unchged)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt 320,764 sh (-14.85%)
Pioneer Investments 488,649 sh (-36.34%)
» More
Q3 2017

FLR Guru Trades in Q3 2017

HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,362,600 sh (New)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 682 sh (New)
Jim Simons 242,200 sh (+60.86%)
John Rogers 1,115,084 sh (+21.31%)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Pioneer Investments Sold Out
Ken Fisher 13,703 sh (-3.29%)
John Buckingham 75,449 sh (-9.78%)
Dodge & Cox 5,205 sh (-16.12%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with FLR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2017-09-30 New Buy0.23%$37.23 - $46.55 $ 61.2948%1,362,600
John Rogers 2017-09-30 Add 21.31%0.09%$37.23 - $46.55 $ 61.2948%1,115,084
Ken Fisher 2017-09-30 Reduce -3.29%$37.23 - $46.55 $ 61.2948%13,703
Dodge & Cox 2017-09-30 Reduce -16.12%$37.23 - $46.55 $ 61.2948%5,205
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2017-09-30 New Buy$37.23 - $46.55 $ 61.2948%682
Joel Greenblatt 2017-09-30 Sold Out 0.21%$37.23 - $46.55 $ 61.2948%0
John Rogers 2017-06-30 Add 110.70%0.26%$43.77 - $52.74 $ 61.2928%919,193
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 Reduce -14.85%0.04%$43.77 - $52.74 $ 61.2928%320,764
Ken Fisher 2017-06-30 Add 4.40%$43.77 - $52.74 $ 61.2928%14,169
Joel Greenblatt 2017-03-31 New Buy0.25%$51.39 - $58.17 $ 61.2912%376,717
Ken Fisher 2017-03-31 Reduce -3.44%$51.39 - $58.17 $ 61.2912%13,572
Dodge & Cox 2017-03-31 Reduce -13.76%$51.39 - $58.17 $ 61.2912%6,205
David Dreman 2017-03-31 Sold Out 0.01%$51.39 - $58.17 $ 61.2912%0
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction    NAICS: 237990    SIC: 1629
Compare:HKSE:03311, HKSE:00659, IST:ENKAI, XPAR:RE, TSX:SNC, TSE:1803, SZSE:002081, OSTO:SKA B, NYSE:PWR, NYSE:ACM, TSE:1802, SHSE:600068, HKSE:03996, OSTO:PEAB B, NYSE:JEC, SHSE:601117, SHSE:600170, XAMS:BOKA, TSE:1963, TSX:WSP » details
Traded in other countries:FLU.Germany, FLR.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Fluor Corp is an engineering company that provides procurement, construction and maintenance as well as project management services to a range of customers including oil and gas, manufacturing, and mining companies, along with the U.S. federal government.

Fluor is a global provider of engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction, and maintenance services to a wide range of customers, including oil and gas, manufacturing, and mining companies, along with the U.S. government. The majority of its revenue comes from energy, chemical, and mining work. Fluor aims to leverage its wide capabilities and global reach to win larger and more complex projects. The company generated 2016 revenue and adjusted operating income of $19.0 billion and $599 million, respectively, and employs 59,000 people.

Top Ranked Articles about Fluor Corp

Analysis: Positioning to Benefit within Fluor, KB Home, Teradyne, Luminex, OFG, and W.P. Carey — Research Highlights Growth, Revenue, and Consolidated Results
Research Report Identifies Weight Watchers International, Guess?, Copart, Extreme Networks, Fluor, and Plains GP Holdings with Renewed Outlook – Fundamental Analysis, Calculating Forward Movement
Bad News Sells; Fight Media Bias People want to remind you September can be treacherous; while stirring up fear they forget to tell you it can be the best time to buy
By the time you’re reading this we’ll be into post-Labor Day trading. Your mind has been tainted by numerous headlines letting you know that September has been, statistically, the worst month of the year for stocks over the last half century. Read more...
Dollar Cost Average on CBI Stock is down from $20 in June – time for trade management
The first drop in May was only a hint of what was to come with Chicago Bridge & Iron (NYSE:CBI) and with the company divesting its Technology Group, the market value has been severely damaged. Long-term investors are given an opportunity to buy more at the lower price. Read more...
Great Lakes Announces Changes to Board of Directors

OAK BROOK, Ill., Jan. 26, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (the “Company” or “Great Lakes”) (NASDAQ:GLDD), the largest provider of dredging services in the United States and a major provider of environmental and remediation services, today announced that Lawrence R. Dickerson and D. Michael Steuert have been appointed to the Board of Director’s 2019 director class, effective January 24, 2017. Mr. Dickerson has been appointed to the Compensation Committee, and Mr. Steuert has been appointed to the Audit Committee.  With the addition of Messrs. Dickerson and Steuert, the Board will expand to nine members.  The Board is expected to be reduced to eight members as of the 2017 Annual Meeting. 
The Company also announced today that current Board Member Peter Deutsch has elected to withdraw his name from consideration for the 2017 slate of nominees.  Mr. Deutsch is a Member of the Audit Committee and a Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Dickerson spent 34 years at Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (NYSE:NYSE:DO), a deepwater oil  and gas drilling contractor, where he served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 2008 until his retirement in 2014.  Prior to his service as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Dickerson served as Chief Financial Officer (CFO), during which he helped take the company public, and Chief Operating Officer, during which he gained substantial operating and commercial experience.  In addition to being a seasoned executive, Mr. Dickerson has significant board experience.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors on the boards of Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR), a gas exploration and production company, and Oil States International (NYSE:NYSE:OIS), an oilfield equipment services company, since 2014.  Mr. Dickerson is on the Audit and Nominating and Governance Committees at Murphy Oil Corporation and on the Audit Committee at Oil States International.  He was Chairman of the Board of Directors at Hercules Offshore, Inc. from 2015 to 2016, an offshore drilling company, and he was a director of on the Board of Directors Global Industries, Ltd. from 2008 - 2012, a subsea construction company that was sold to Technip in 2011.  Mr. Steuert served as senior vice president (SVP) and CFO of Fluor Corporation (NYSE:NYSE:FLR), one of the world’s largest publicly traded engineering, procurement, construction, maintenance, and project management companies, from 2001 until his retirement in 2012.  Prior to his service at Fluor, Mr. Steuert served as SVP and CFO of Litton Industries Inc., a defense contractor acquired by Northrop Grumman Corporation in 2001, and as SVP and CFO of GenCorp Inc., now Aerojet Rocketdyne, a technology-based aerospace and defense company, from 1990 to 1999.  Mr. Steuert started his career at TRW Inc. In addition to his extensive executive leadership experience, Mr. Steuert has substantial board experience.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors of LNG Ltd. (ASX:LNG) since 2015 and is a member of the Board’s Audit Committee and Chairman of its Risk Committee.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors of Weyerhaeuser Co. (NYSE:NYSE:WY) since 2004 and is Chairman and Financial expert of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Corporate Responsibility and Governance Committee. Robert B. Uhler, P.E., Chairman of the Board, commented, “Larry and Mike bring a wealth of relevant valuable experience to the GLDD Board.  I am confident each will contribute to the GLDD Board and to management’s goal of delivering long-term shareholder value for the Company.  On behalf of the Board, I welcome both of them and look forward to working with them.” Mr. Uhler continued, “These appointments follow our previous announcements that Lasse Petterson and Ryan Levenson joined the Great Lakes Board in late December. The addition of these new directors reflects our commitment to Board refreshment and further strengthens our Board of Directors.  Finally, on behalf of the Board, I’d like to extend our sincere gratitude to Mr. Deutsch for his service and commitment to the Board over the past several years.” The Company Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (“Great Lakes” or the “Company”) is the largest provider of dredging services in the United States and the only U.S. dredging company with significant international operations. The Company is also a significant provider of environmental and remediation services on land and water.  The Company employs civil, ocean and mechanical engineering staff in its estimating, production and project management functions.  In its over 126-year history, the Company has never failed to complete a marine project. Great Lakes has a disciplined training program for engineers that ensures experienced-based performance as they advance through Company operations. Great Lakes also owns and operates the largest and most diverse fleet in the U.S. dredging industry, comprised of over 200 specialized vessels. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this press release may constitute "forward-looking" statements as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "PSLRA") or in releases made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), all as may be amended from time to time. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Great Lakes and its subsidiaries, or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking language, such as the words "plan," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "project," "may," "would," "could," "should," "seeks," or "scheduled to," or other similar words, or the negative of these terms or other variations of these terms or comparable language, or by discussion of strategy or intentions. These cautionary statements are being made pursuant to the Exchange Act and the PSLRA with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the "safe harbor" provisions of such laws. Great Lakes cautions investors that any forward-looking statements made by Great Lakes are not guarantees or indicative of future performance. Important assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements with respect to Great Lakes, include, but are not limited to: our ability to obtain federal government dredging and other contracts; our ability to qualify as an eligible bidder under government contract criteria and to compete successfully against other qualified bidders; risks associated with cost over-runs, operating cost inflation and potential claims for liquidated damages, particularly with respect to our fixed cost contracts; the timing of our performance on contracts; significant liabilities that could be imposed were we to fail to comply with government contracting regulations; risks related to international dredging operations, including instability in the Middle East; a significant negative change to large, single customer contracts from which a significant portion of our international revenue is derived; changes in previously-recorded revenue and profit due to our use of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting; consequences of any lapse in disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting; changes in the amount of our estimated backlog; our ability to obtain bonding or letters of credit; increasing costs to operate and maintain aging vessels; equipment or mechanical failures; acquisition integration and consolidation risks; liabilities related to our historical demolition business; impacts of legal and regulatory proceedings; unforeseen delays and cost overruns related to the construction of new vessels; our becoming liable for the obligations of joint ventures, partners and subcontractors; capital and operational costs due to environmental regulations; unionized labor force work stoppages; maintaining an adequate level of insurance coverage; information technology security breaches; our substantial amount of indebtedness; restrictions imposed by financing covenants; the impact of adverse capital and credit market conditions; limitations on our hedging strategy imposed by new statutory and regulatory requirements for derivative transactions; foreign exchange risks; changes in macroeconomic indicators and the overall business climate; and losses attributable to our investments in privately financed projects. For additional information on these and other risks and uncertainties, please see Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of Great Lakes' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and in other securities filings by Great Lakes with the SEC. Although Great Lakes believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from a projection or assumption in any forward-looking statements. Great Lakes' future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made only as of the date hereof and Great Lakes does not have or undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, subsequent events or otherwise, unless otherwise required by law. Source: Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation GLDD CORP
For further information contact:
Mary Morrissey, Investor Relations
630-574-3467

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 42.46
FLR's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
89% of the 857 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.19 vs. FLR: 42.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
FLR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.37  Med: 20.88 Max: 58.67
Current: 42.46
7.37
58.67
Forward PE Ratio 24.15
FLR's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 14.79 vs. FLR: 24.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 42.46
FLR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
89% of the 855 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.32 vs. FLR: 42.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
FLR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.37  Med: 19.55 Max: 58.67
Current: 42.46
7.37
58.67
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 17.72
FLR's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
75% of the 493 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 14.08 vs. FLR: 17.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
FLR' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.63  Med: 18.01 Max: 113.03
Current: 17.72
5.63
113.03
PB Ratio 2.58
FLR's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
64% of the 1049 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.35 vs. FLR: 2.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
FLR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.65  Med: 2.78 Max: 7.28
Current: 2.58
1.65
7.28
PS Ratio 0.44
FLR's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
79% of the 1048 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.70 vs. FLR: 0.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
FLR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.41 Max: 0.98
Current: 0.44
0.25
0.98
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 16.52
FLR's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
68% of the 350 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.76 vs. FLR: 16.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
FLR' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.86  Med: 19.52 Max: 151.87
Current: 16.52
6.86
151.87
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 10.63
FLR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
70% of the 441 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.42 vs. FLR: 10.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
FLR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.08  Med: 12.99 Max: 29.96
Current: 10.63
5.08
29.96
EV-to-EBIT 17.08
FLR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
69% of the 890 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.99 vs. FLR: 17.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
FLR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.2  Med: 9.4 Max: 24.5
Current: 17.08
3.2
24.5
EV-to-EBITDA 11.64
FLR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
53% of the 922 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.69 vs. FLR: 11.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
FLR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.8  Med: 7.8 Max: 19.5
Current: 11.64
2.8
19.5
EV-to-Revenue 0.42
FLR's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
85% of the 1048 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.91 vs. FLR: 0.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
FLR' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.4 Max: 0.9
Current: 0.42
0.2
0.9
Shiller PE Ratio 18.51
FLR's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
71% of the 213 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 19.81 vs. FLR: 18.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
FLR' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.63  Med: 21.19 Max: 37.57
Current: 18.51
11.63
37.57
Current Ratio 1.56
FLR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
53% of the 1019 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.46 vs. FLR: 1.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
FLR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.88  Med: 1.51 Max: 1.91
Current: 1.56
0.88
1.91
Quick Ratio 1.18
FLR's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
60% of the 1019 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. FLR: 1.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
FLR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.07 Max: 1.63
Current: 1.18
0.76
1.63
Days Inventory 28.42
FLR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
54% of the 891 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 26.30 vs. FLR: 28.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
FLR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.93  Med: 26.33 Max: 31.78
Current: 28.42
16.93
31.78
Days Sales Outstanding 28.72
FLR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
84% of the 819 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 74.86 vs. FLR: 28.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
FLR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.42  Med: 20.38 Max: 32.6
Current: 28.72
16.42
32.6
Days Payable 27.10
FLR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
77% of the 710 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 74.77 vs. FLR: 27.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
FLR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 20.13  Med: 25.87 Max: 31.82
Current: 27.1
20.13
31.82

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.38
FLR's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
54% of the 1129 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.32 vs. FLR: 1.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
FLR' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.05 Max: 2.23
Current: 1.38
0.44
2.23
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.59
FLR's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
86% of the 653 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. FLR: 0.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
FLR' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.17 Max: 0.59
Current: 0.59
0.13
0.59
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 9.50
FLR's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
55% of the 525 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.20 vs. FLR: 9.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
FLR' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 7.7 Max: 18.9
Current: 9.5
0
18.9
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.39
FLR's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
62% of the 1078 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.58 vs. FLR: 1.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 2.35
FLR's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
59% of the 1448 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.85 vs. FLR: 2.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
FLR' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 1.78 Max: 3.77
Current: 2.35
0.74
3.77
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 4.80
FLR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
97% of the 576 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -3.00 vs. FLR: 4.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
FLR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.8  Med: -0.1 Max: 5
Current: 4.8
-2.8
5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 3.12
FLR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
66% of the 951 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.45 vs. FLR: 3.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
FLR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.97  Med: 3.22 Max: 7.08
Current: 3.12
1.97
7.08
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.25
FLR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
69% of the 491 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. FLR: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
FLR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.84  Med: 1.33 Max: 5.51
Current: 1.25
0.84
5.51
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.07
FLR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
84% of the 923 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. FLR: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
FLR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1 Max: 4.37
Current: 1.07
0.47
4.37
Price-to-Graham-Number 2.43
FLR's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
79% of the 694 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. FLR: 2.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
FLR' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.89  Med: 1.69 Max: 3.23
Current: 2.43
0.89
3.23
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.86
FLR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
56% of the 1088 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.71 vs. FLR: 5.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
FLR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.1  Med: 10.6 Max: 31.3
Current: 5.86
4.1
31.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -2.31
FLR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
60% of the 552 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.92 vs. FLR: -2.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
FLR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.31  Med: 13.3 Max: 37.6
Current: -2.31
-2.31
37.6

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $19,483.29
EPS (TTM) $ 1.43
Beta1.47
Short Percentage of Float3.79%
52-Week Range $37.04 - 60.61
Shares Outstanding (Mil)139.88

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 19,267 19,217 20,242
EPS ($) 1.62 2.31 2.89
EPS without NRI ($) 1.62 2.31 2.89
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
9.98%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.84 0.81 0.80

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 77
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}