Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.10
HLT's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
83% of the 886 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 0.66 vs. HLT: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
HLT' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.05 Max: 0.13
Current: 0.1
0.04
0.13
Equity-to-Asset 0.10
HLT's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
93% of the 870 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. HLT: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
HLT' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.18 Max: 0.25
Current: 0.1
0.09
0.25
Debt-to-Equity 4.57
HLT's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
96% of the 661 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. HLT: 4.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
HLT' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.6  Med: 2.53 Max: 8.99
Current: 4.57
1.6
8.99
Debt-to-EBITDA 2.35
HLT's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
55% of the 637 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.87 vs. HLT: 2.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
HLT' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.35  Med: 5.75 Max: 11.97
Current: 2.35
2.35
11.97
Interest Coverage 3.60
HLT's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
75% of the 728 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 11.70 vs. HLT: 3.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
HLT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.93 Max: 3.6
Current: 3.6
0.58
3.6
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 1.81
Beneish M-Score: -2.58
WACC vs ROIC
8.48%
5.89%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 16.77
HLT's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
71% of the 880 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 7.78 vs. HLT: 16.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
HLT' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.85  Med: 11.86 Max: 18.37
Current: 16.77
6.85
18.37
Net Margin % 0.25
HLT's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
70% of the 879 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 4.85 vs. HLT: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
HLT' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 3.79 Max: 12.46
Current: 0.25
0.25
12.46
ROE % 0.94
HLT's ROE % is ranked lower than
69% of the 846 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 5.44 vs. HLT: 0.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
HLT' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.94  Med: 15.83 Max: 27.09
Current: 0.94
0.94
27.09
ROA % 0.17
HLT's ROA % is ranked lower than
69% of the 887 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.54 vs. HLT: 0.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
HLT' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 1.7 Max: 5.43
Current: 0.17
0.17
5.43
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 56.47
HLT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
75% of the 882 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 9.67 vs. HLT: 56.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
HLT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.1  Med: 19 Max: 56.47
Current: 56.47
12.1
56.47
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 3.80
HLT's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
56% of the 790 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.50 vs. HLT: 3.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
HLT' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 3.75 Max: 4.2
Current: 3.8
0
4.2
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 7.10
HLT's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
53% of the 671 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 4.60 vs. HLT: 7.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
HLT' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 11.05 Max: 16.8
Current: 7.1
0
16.8
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -8.00
HLT's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
65% of the 598 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 3.80 vs. HLT: -8.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
HLT' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 14.15 Max: 55.2
Current: -8
0
55.2
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc HLT.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» HLT's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-02-15)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2016

HLT Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 9,139 sh (New)
Jim Simons 218,300 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 50,000 sh (New)
PRIMECAP Management 1,533,400 sh (+47.40%)
Richard Pzena 12,342,393 sh (+25.89%)
Ron Baron 1,640,050 sh (+16.69%)
Steven Cohen 927,600 sh (+10.65%)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Steve Mandel Sold Out
» More
Q1 2017

HLT Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Joel Greenblatt 53,477 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 192,795 sh (New)
John Burbank 380,708 sh (New)
Jim Simons 690,700 sh (+849.20%)
PRIMECAP Management 687,464 sh (+34.50%)
Richard Pzena 4,256,903 sh (+3.47%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Signature Select Canadian Fund Sold Out
Ron Baron 480,261 sh (-12.15%)
Steven Cohen 264,801 sh (-14.36%)
» More
Q2 2017

HLT Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Ken Heebner 660,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 20,717 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 94,200 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 633,106 sh (+1083.88%)
PRIMECAP Management 885,164 sh (+28.76%)
Pioneer Investments 208,962 sh (+8.39%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
John Burbank Sold Out
Richard Pzena 4,152,880 sh (-2.44%)
Ron Baron 420,861 sh (-12.37%)
Steven Cohen 150,089 sh (-43.32%)
» More
Q3 2017

HLT Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 70,351 sh (+239.58%)
Ken Heebner 760,000 sh (+15.15%)
Richard Pzena 4,171,275 sh (+0.44%)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 876,164 sh (-1.02%)
Ron Baron 405,922 sh (-3.55%)
Steven Cohen 143,589 sh (-4.33%)
Joel Greenblatt 441,579 sh (-30.25%)
Pioneer Investments 123,676 sh (-40.81%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with HLT

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Richard Pzena 2017-09-30 Add 0.44%0.01%$60.82 - $69.5 $ 75.7619%4,171,275
Ken Heebner 2017-09-30 Add 15.15%0.3%$60.82 - $69.5 $ 75.7619%760,000
Joel Greenblatt 2017-09-30 Reduce -30.25%0.17%$60.82 - $69.5 $ 75.7619%441,579
Ron Baron 2017-09-30 Reduce -3.55%$60.82 - $69.5 $ 75.7619%405,922
Richard Pzena 2017-06-30 Reduce -2.44%0.03%$56.6 - $67.41 $ 75.7622%4,152,880
Ken Heebner 2017-06-30 New Buy1.87%$56.6 - $67.41 $ 75.7622%660,000
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 Add 1083.88%0.5%$56.6 - $67.41 $ 75.7622%633,106
Ron Baron 2017-06-30 Reduce -12.37%0.02%$56.6 - $67.41 $ 75.7622%420,861
Richard Pzena 2017-03-31 Add 3.47%0.05%$55.4 - $59.46 $ 75.7631%4,256,903
Ron Baron 2017-03-31 Reduce -12.15%0.03%$55.4 - $59.46 $ 75.7631%480,261
Joel Greenblatt 2017-03-31 New Buy0.04%$55.4 - $59.46 $ 75.7631%53,477
Richard Pzena 2016-12-31 Add 25.89%0.39%$47.04 - $58.65 $ 75.7646%4,114,127
Ron Baron 2016-12-31 Add 16.69%0.04%$47.04 - $58.65 $ 75.7646%546,683
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Travel & Leisure » Lodging    NAICS: 721110    SIC: 7011
Compare:XPAR:AC, NYSE:WYN, SZSE:000069, LSE:IHG, SAU:4280, NAS:HTHT, SGX:C09, NYSE:H, HKSE:00069, NYSE:PK, SHSE:600754, NYSE:CHH, NYSE:STAY, HKSE:00041, SHSE:600258, XMCE:MEL, OSTO:PNDX B, SGX:M04, HKSE:00045, LSE:MLC » details
Traded in other countries:HI91.Germany, HLT.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc operates hotels and resorts. The company manages a total or approximately 750,000 rooms across over 10 brands. Some of its brands include Hampton, Hilton, Home2, Curio, Canopy, and Tru.

Hilton is an operator of 838,000 rooms across 14 brands addressing the midscale through luxury segments. Hampton and Hilton are the two largest brands by total room count at around 30% each, while Home2, Curio, Canopy, and Tru represent low single digits of existing rooms but high single digits of the pipeline room base. Managed and franchised represent 90% of adjusted EBITDA. Americas represents 75% of total adjusted EBITDA, while Asia-Pacific is 10%, Europe 12%, and Africa and Middle East is 3%.

Guru Investment Theses on Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc

Bill Ackman Comments on Hilton Worldwide Holdings - Aug 18, 2017

During the quarter we exited our previously undisclosed passive investment in Hilton Worldwide Holdings (NYSE:HLT) at a 32% profit versus our cost over an 11-month holding period. Our approach to disclosure is to provide to you the information that we would want if our positions were reversed; that is, if you were the investment manager and we were the client, with the caveat that we do not disclose information that would create a competitive disadvantage for the funds unless we are legally required to do so. We did not disclose our investment in Hilton until we disposed of it for this reason.

Hilton is an asset-light, high-margin, fee-based business that primarily franchises and manages hotel properties under more than a dozen hotel brands, including Hilton, Hampton, DoubleTree, and Hilton Garden Inn. Hilton has organically established (i.e., not through acquisition) an industry-leading global pipeline of franchised hotel rooms, which amounts to nearly 40% of its existing room count and should support a high level of capital-light growth for years into the future. Hilton’s extensive and growing network of brands and properties offers a significant and self-reinforcing value proposition to both guests and hotel owners, which creates a strong competitive moat around the business. For guests, Hilton provides a consistent and reliable experience in a variety of destinations at different price points and an attractive loyalty program which features enhanced customer service, amenities, and awards. For hotel owners, Hilton provides access to its more than 60 million loyalty program members, scaled marketing programs, reservation and IT systems, and supply chain purchasing power.

Prior to our investment in the summer of 2016, the company announced it would spin off its owned hotel and timeshare businesses, which we believed would highlight the significant value of its remaining franchised and management business. We have long admired Hilton’s business and had followed its progress since the IPO at the end of 2013. Despite strong business performance since the IPO, which included 15% unit growth, more than 30% EBITDA growth, and more than 70% free cash flow per share growth, Hilton’s share price had increased by a total of only about 10%. We believed that two key investor concerns were weighing on the share price: a potential downturn in the lodging cycle and the potential competitive threat from Airbnb.

To determine the risk of a downturn in the lodging cycle, we undertook an extensive analysis of the previous cycles over the past thirty years. We observed that in the three prior downturns (1991, 2001-2002, and 2008-2009), RevPAR (a measure of same-store sales for the lodging industry) averaged positive annual growth over the five-year period starting just prior to the downturn. While we recognized that it was possible that RevPAR might decline for a period of time, we believed it likely that RevPAR would average positive growth over a three-to-five year time horizon. Moreover, we believed the capital-light unit growth embedded in Hilton’s hotel pipeline would more than offset a potential decline in RevPAR and allow for continued annual revenue and EBITDA growth.

To understand the potential competitive risk regarding Airbnb, we reviewed the publicly available data and research on the company and we interviewed dozens of hotel owners, travel agents, lodging industry consultants, and employees of Airbnb and other vacation-rental competitors. We concluded that Hilton’s business model was unlikely to face a meaningful threat from Airbnb as the two businesses tend to compete for different customer sets. The vast majority of Hilton’s revenue derives from short-stay business travelers who value the consistent experience, amenities, and loyalty program that Hilton’s brands provide, whereas the typical Airbnb customer is a leisure traveler who seeks out unique and local accommodations for a lengthier stay. Furthermore, a large portion of Hilton’s portfolio is based in suburban markets where there is currently limited Airbnb inventory.

In the beginning of 2017, Hilton spun off its owned hotel and timeshare businesses. After the spin, Hilton’s share price began a steady upward ascent as the company continued to report strong business performance and initiated a meaningful share repurchase program. We recently exited our position to allocate capital to other opportunities and achieved a 32% total return on our investment in less than a year. Hilton did not make a more meaningful impact on overall Company performance because its rapid rise at the time of our investment limited the position size to ~5% of the portfolio.

Hilton embodied many of the characteristics that we have identified in other successful investments: a high-quality business with a significant opportunity for capital-light growth, a best-in-class management team, sponsorship from a well-regarded sponsor (Blackstone), and a built-in catalyst, the spinoffs, to unlock shareholder value. While we generally prefer to allocate our capital to activist situations, if we can find a high quality business run by a highly capable management team, and there is appropriate shareholder oversight in the boardroom, we are open to passive investments.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s second quarter 2017 shareholder letter.

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc

New Research Coverage Highlights The Blackstone Group, Hilton Worldwide, Kimco Realty, Sonus Networks, First Solar, and Bill Barrett — Consolidated Revenues, Company Growth, and Expectations for 2018
Cengage Partners with Hilton to Offer Free High School Diploma and Career Training to Employees
5 Companies Hit 52-Week Highs Hilton among those achieving milestone
According to GuruFocus' list, these stocks have reached their 52-week highs. Read more...
Hilton and Fess Parker Family Announce Extensive Remodel and Rebranding of Santa Barbara's Iconic Beachfront Resort
Tru by Hilton Breaks Ground on Raleigh Durham Airport Hotel
Bill Ackman Comments on Hilton Worldwide Holdings Guru stock highlight
During the quarter we exited our previously undisclosed passive investment in Hilton Worldwide Holdings (NYSE:HLT) at a 32% profit versus our cost over an 11-month holding period. Our approach to disclosure is to provide to you the information that we would want if our positions were reversed; that is, if you were the investment manager and we were the client, with the caveat that we do not disclose information that would create a competitive disadvantage for the funds unless we are legally required to do so. We did not disclose our investment in Hilton until we disposed of it for this reason. Read more...
Home2 Suites by Hilton Mishawaka South Bend Opens
Tru by Hilton Set to be Developed in Orlando, Florida
Options trade ideas for ANI Pharmaceuticals, Facebook, Gilead Sciences, Hilton Worldwide and Shutterfly offer returns of 21% or more!
Hilton Worldwide, Align Technology, ANSYS Set to Join S&P 500; Teradata and Ryder System to Join S&P MidCap 400

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 757.60
HLT's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
99% of the 635 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 22.71 vs. HLT: 757.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
HLT' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.8  Med: 29.18 Max: 757.6
Current: 757.6
8.8
757.6
Forward PE Ratio 31.85
HLT's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
85% of the 136 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 18.21 vs. HLT: 31.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 63.66
HLT's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
99% of the 635 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 22.76 vs. HLT: 63.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
HLT' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.8  Med: 29.18 Max: 94.7
Current: 63.66
8.8
94.7
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 42.00
HLT's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
78% of the 391 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 19.63 vs. HLT: 42.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
HLT' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.87  Med: 33.67 Max: 42
Current: 42
17.87
42
PB Ratio 16.81
HLT's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
97% of the 838 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.83 vs. HLT: 16.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
HLT' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.05  Med: 3.49 Max: 16.81
Current: 16.81
2.05
16.81
PS Ratio 1.92
HLT's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 866 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.89 vs. HLT: 1.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
HLT' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 1.64 Max: 2.11
Current: 1.92
1.09
2.11
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 29.93
HLT's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
69% of the 395 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 18.96 vs. HLT: 29.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
HLT' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.93  Med: 16.36 Max: 29.93
Current: 29.93
7.93
29.93
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 24.24
HLT's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
80% of the 525 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 11.78 vs. HLT: 24.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
HLT' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.7  Med: 11.91 Max: 24.24
Current: 24.24
6.7
24.24
EV-to-EBIT 14.08
HLT's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
56% of the 675 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 17.34 vs. HLT: 14.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
HLT' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.7  Med: 16.4 Max: 23.4
Current: 14.08
10.7
23.4
EV-to-EBITDA 10.72
HLT's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
57% of the 727 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 12.67 vs. HLT: 10.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
HLT' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8  Med: 11.6 Max: 14.8
Current: 10.72
8
14.8
EV-to-Revenue 2.33
HLT's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
55% of the 863 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.37 vs. HLT: 2.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
HLT' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2  Med: 2.7 Max: 3.2
Current: 2.33
2
3.2
PEG Ratio 5.26
HLT's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
96% of the 287 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.34 vs. HLT: 5.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
HLT' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 46.07
Current: 5.26
0
46.07
Current Ratio 0.94
HLT's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 841 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.35 vs. HLT: 0.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
HLT' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.94  Med: 1.11 Max: 1.37
Current: 0.94
0.94
1.37
Quick Ratio 0.94
HLT's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
59% of the 841 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. HLT: 0.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
HLT' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 0.96 Max: 1.12
Current: 0.94
0.86
1.12
Days Inventory 27.43
HLT's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
64% of the 711 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 25.14 vs. HLT: 27.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
HLT' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 25.96  Med: 38.08 Max: 44.32
Current: 27.43
25.96
44.32
Days Sales Outstanding 26.09
HLT's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
55% of the 683 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 27.05 vs. HLT: 26.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
HLT' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 26.09  Med: 28.33 Max: 31.45
Current: 26.09
26.09
31.45

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.79
HLT's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
79% of the 853 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.11 vs. HLT: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
HLT' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.33 Max: 1.88
Current: 0.79
0.39
1.88
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.55
HLT's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 481 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. HLT: 0.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
HLT' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.45 Max: 0.8
Current: 0.55
0.1
0.8
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.79
HLT's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
84% of the 787 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.37 vs. HLT: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.79
HLT's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
78% of the 1052 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 2.50 vs. HLT: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
HLT' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.33 Max: 1.88
Current: 0.79
0.39
1.88
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.10
HLT's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 501 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: -2.60 vs. HLT: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
HLT' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.3  Med: -1.2 Max: 0
Current: -0.1
-2.3
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.17
HLT's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
64% of the 717 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. HLT: 1.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
HLT' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.81  Med: 1 Max: 1.17
Current: 1.17
0.81
1.17
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 7.10
HLT's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
57% of the 886 Companies
in the Global Lodging industry.

( Industry Median: 4.43 vs. HLT: 7.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
HLT' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.3  Med: 6.1 Max: 9.4
Current: 7.1
4.3
9.4

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $12,981.00
EPS (TTM) $ 0.10
Beta1.39
Short Percentage of Float3.19%
52-Week Range $52.09 - 76.22
Shares Outstanding (Mil)319.95

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20
Revenue (Mil $) 5,329 5,684 3,851 4,000
EPS ($) 1.95 2.39 2.74 3.14
EPS without NRI ($) 1.95 2.39 2.74 3.14
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
61.33%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.60 0.78 0.72 0.76

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 66
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyN
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}