Switch to:
Also traded in: Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Chile, Germany, Mexico, Netherlands, Peru, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.26
IBM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
88% of the 2180 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.23 vs. IBM: 0.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
IBM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.27 Max: 0.6
Current: 0.26
0.13
0.6
Equity-to-Asset 0.14
IBM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
92% of the 2115 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. IBM: 0.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
IBM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.24 Max: 0.5
Current: 0.14
0.1
0.5
Debt-to-Equity 2.73
IBM's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
95% of the 1267 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.27 vs. IBM: 2.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
IBM' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 1.24 Max: 3.44
Current: 2.73
0.43
3.44
Debt-to-EBITDA 2.77
IBM's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
72% of the 1112 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. IBM: 2.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
IBM' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.11  Med: 1.62 Max: 2.83
Current: 2.77
1.11
2.83
Interest Coverage 18.31
IBM's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
63% of the 1702 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 46.64 vs. IBM: 18.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
IBM' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.28  Med: 40.31 Max: 49.36
Current: 18.31
18.28
49.36
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 3.59
Beneish M-Score: -0.53
WACC vs ROIC
9.80%
19.60%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 16.61
IBM's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
81% of the 2144 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.91 vs. IBM: 16.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
IBM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.91  Med: 18.57 Max: 20.59
Current: 16.61
14.91
20.59
Net Margin % 10.97
IBM's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
76% of the 2144 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.58 vs. IBM: 10.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
IBM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.27  Med: 14.84 Max: 16.52
Current: 10.97
7.27
16.52
ROE % 48.03
IBM's ROE % is ranked higher than
96% of the 2062 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.36 vs. IBM: 48.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
IBM' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.1  Med: 73.24 Max: 100.96
Current: 48.03
32.1
100.96
ROA % 7.07
IBM's ROA % is ranked higher than
69% of the 2199 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.95 vs. IBM: 7.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
IBM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.74  Med: 11.93 Max: 14.09
Current: 7.07
4.74
14.09
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 73.41
IBM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
68% of the 2165 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 23.63 vs. IBM: 73.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
IBM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 73.41  Med: 142.72 Max: 166.47
Current: 73.41
73.41
166.47
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 1.50
IBM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
64% of the 1829 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. IBM: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
IBM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.2  Med: 5 Max: 13.2
Current: 1.5
-3.2
13.2
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -4.30
IBM's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
72% of the 1588 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 9.10 vs. IBM: -4.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
IBM' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 7.6 Max: 26.1
Current: -4.3
0
26.1
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -11.20
IBM's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
76% of the 1432 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.70 vs. IBM: -11.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
IBM' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 6.2 Max: 33.7
Current: -11.2
0
33.7
GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with International Business Machines Corp IBM.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» IBM's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2019-04-16)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2018

IBM Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Joel Greenblatt 301,775 sh (New)
Murray Stahl 1,381 sh (New)
Robert Olstein 59,000 sh (+3.51%)
Robert Bruce 146,500 sh (+37.56%)
John Buckingham 48,712 sh (+4.16%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 707,814 sh (+14.37%)
Pioneer Investments 1,771,169 sh (+9.77%)
Mario Gabelli 12,201 sh (+3.50%)
David Dreman 5,850 sh (unchged)
Tom Gayner 15,700 sh (unchged)
Prem Watsa 265,700 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham 2,266 sh (unchged)
Warren Buffett Sold Out
First Eagle Investment Sold Out
John Rogers Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Jerome Dodson Sold Out
Ken Fisher 23,133 sh (-3.74%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 35,822 sh (-30.00%)
Dodge & Cox 83,796 sh (-3.11%)
Tom Russo 6,173 sh (-18.65%)
John Hussman 5,000 sh (-80.54%)
Paul Tudor Jones 5,664 sh (-77.74%)
Jim Simons 1,512,000 sh (-51.46%)
Mairs and Power 121,905 sh (-4.66%)
Ray Dalio 26,686 sh (-25.45%)
» More
Q2 2018

IBM Guru Trades in Q2 2018

Ken Fisher 24,781 sh (+7.12%)
Joel Greenblatt 381,339 sh (+26.37%)
Pioneer Investments 2,134,549 sh (+20.52%)
Ray Dalio 102,009 sh (+282.26%)
Robert Bruce 146,500 sh (unchged)
Prem Watsa 265,700 sh (unchged)
John Hussman 5,000 sh (unchged)
Murray Stahl Sold Out
Tom Gayner Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Robert Olstein 54,000 sh (-8.47%)
Dodge & Cox 81,999 sh (-2.14%)
Tom Russo 5,503 sh (-10.85%)
John Buckingham 48,644 sh (-0.14%)
Jeremy Grantham 1,866 sh (-17.65%)
Mairs and Power 91,002 sh (-25.35%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 619,009 sh (-12.55%)
Mario Gabelli 11,959 sh (-1.98%)
Jim Simons 1,428,700 sh (-5.51%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 35,432 sh (-1.09%)
» More
Q3 2018

IBM Guru Trades in Q3 2018

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 929,270 sh (+50.12%)
Pioneer Investments 2,970,693 sh (+39.17%)
John Buckingham 49,197 sh (+1.14%)
John Hussman 5,000 sh (unchged)
Robert Olstein 54,000 sh (unchged)
Prem Watsa Sold Out
Ken Fisher 24,130 sh (-2.63%)
Mario Gabelli 11,459 sh (-4.18%)
Robert Bruce 141,500 sh (-3.41%)
Tom Russo 1,571 sh (-71.45%)
Ray Dalio 64,548 sh (-36.72%)
Jim Simons 790,799 sh (-44.65%)
Jeremy Grantham 1,355 sh (-27.38%)
Mairs and Power 65,341 sh (-28.20%)
Joel Greenblatt 148,408 sh (-61.08%)
Dodge & Cox 78,910 sh (-3.77%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 34,157 sh (-3.60%)
» More
Q4 2018

IBM Guru Trades in Q4 2018

Caxton Associates 3,722 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 13,800 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 17,320 sh (New)
Robert Olstein 61,500 sh (+13.89%)
Ray Dalio 155,071 sh (+140.24%)
Joel Greenblatt 532,818 sh (+259.02%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 974,172 sh (+4.83%)
John Hussman 5,000 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Tom Russo Sold Out
Ken Fisher 21,004 sh (-12.95%)
Mario Gabelli 11,429 sh (-0.26%)
Mairs and Power 46,587 sh (-28.70%)
Dodge & Cox 77,870 sh (-1.32%)
Pioneer Investments 2,473,141 sh (-16.75%)
Robert Bruce 139,800 sh (-1.20%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with IBM

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

Guru Date Action
Impact Price Range
(Average)*
Change from Average Comment Current Shares
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Application Software » Information Technology Services    NAICS: 541512    SIC: 7373
Compare:NYSE:ACN, BOM:532540, NAS:CTSH, NSE:INFY, TSE:6501, XMCE:AMS, NYSE:DXC, XPAR:CAP, NSE:HCLTECH, BOM:507685, XKRX:018260, TSX:GIB.A, XKRX:034730, TSE:9613, XPAR:ATO, TSE:6702, TSE:4307, NYSE:IT, NAS:CDW, NYSE:LDOS » details
Traded in other countries:IBM.Argentina, IBM.Austria, IBMC.Belgium, IBMB34.Brazil, IBM.Chile, IBM.Germany, IBM.Mexico, IBMA.Netherlands, IBM.Peru, IBM.Switzerland, IBM.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
International Business Machines Corp offers a variety of IT services along with software, and hardware. It has operations in over 170 countries and provides planning, build, manage, and maintain IT infrastructure, platforms, applications, and services.

IBM is an IT behemoth with an operating history dating back over a century. The company's offerings span a range of services, software, and hardware. IBM operates on a global scale, with operations in over 170 countries (the company generates a little more than half of its revenue outside the Americas). The firm has an entrenched position globally within the largest multinational firms, providing an end-to-end portfolio that helps enterprises' plan, build, manage, and maintain IT infrastructure, platforms, applications, and services.

Guru Investment Theses on International Business Machines Corp

Jerome Dodson Comments on IBM - Jul 25, 2017

Our worst performer was International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM), one of the world’s largest providers of information-technology solutions and services. The stock fell 11.7% from $174.14 to $153.83, reducing the Fund’s return by 49 basis points. Investors were disappointed by IBM’s weak quarterly operating margins, and questioned whether the company will be able to meet its annual earnings guidance. The stock fell again when famed investor Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) sold a third of his shares. While we recognize the near-term challenges, we believe IBM’s transition to a software-and analytics-oriented business will create a lot of value, so we’re holding onto our position.

From Jerome Dodson (Trades, Portfolio)'s second quarter 2017 Parnassus Fund commentary.

Check out Jerome Dodson latest stock trades

Jerome Dodson Comments on IBM - Apr 26, 2017

International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM), one of the world’s largest providers of information technology solutions and services, rose 4.9% from $165.99 to $174.14, contributing 27 basis points to the Fund’s return. Robust demand for its analytics and cloud software drove better-than-expected earnings. The company also saw growth rebound in China, aided by an increase in large mainframe upgrade deals with Chinese banks.

Jerome Dodson (Trades, Portfolio)'s first quarter 2017 Parnassus Funds commentary.

Check out Jerome Dodson latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about International Business Machines Corp

COFCO International selects IBM Services for global digital transformation
Blockchain's Spectacular Growth Offers Outstanding Opportunity The market for blockchain technology is projected to grow to more than $23 billion by 2023
IBM (IBM) will be working with the Canadian unit of large German drug manufacturer Boehringer Ingleheim to integrate blockchain into clinical trials, according to a press release Tuesday. Use of the technology by other pharmaceutical companies is expected to grow, thanks to blockchain’s ability to improve patient compliance. A related article in MedCity News has stated that Sanofi (SNY), among others, is expected to be next to employ blockchain in clinical trials. Read more...
BUCKiTDREAM Turns to Watson Marketing for Improved Customer Experience Personalization
IBM Services transforming Vivo Energy with SAP S/4HANA®
IBM Watson Health and the Broad Institute Launch Initiative to Help Clinicians Predict the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease with Genomics and AI
IBM Watson Health Invests in Research Collaborations with Leading Medical Centers to Advance the Application of AI to Health
Cigna and Sentara Healthcare Expand Blockchain-Based Ecosystem for Healthcare Industry - Along with Aetna, Anthem, Health Care Service Corporation, PNC Bank and IBM
Harley-Davidson to Redefine Riding with IBM Cloud
IBM Helps Organizations Monitor Their Workers' Safety with Watson IoT
IBM Watson Assistant Continues to Drive Global Business Transformation

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 14.51
IBM's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 1475 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 24.79 vs. IBM: 14.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
IBM' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.94  Med: 13.21 Max: 27.25
Current: 14.51
8.94
27.25
Forward PE Ratio 9.95
IBM's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
95% of the 456 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 26.18 vs. IBM: 9.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 14.51
IBM's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
75% of the 1414 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 24.46 vs. IBM: 14.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
IBM' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.89  Med: 12.82 Max: 27.25
Current: 14.51
8.89
27.25
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 11.09
IBM's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
85% of the 826 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 25.26 vs. IBM: 11.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
IBM' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.64  Med: 12.6 Max: 17.24
Current: 11.09
7.64
17.24
PB Ratio 7.47
IBM's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
79% of the 2262 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.93 vs. IBM: 7.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
IBM' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.66  Med: 8.97 Max: 14.09
Current: 7.47
3.66
14.09
PS Ratio 1.59
IBM's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
63% of the 2268 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.86 vs. IBM: 1.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
IBM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 1.84 Max: 2.38
Current: 1.59
1
2.38
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 11.15
IBM's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
84% of the 924 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 28.20 vs. IBM: 11.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
IBM' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8  Med: 12.64 Max: 16.83
Current: 11.15
8
16.83
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 8.29
IBM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
84% of the 1181 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 20.26 vs. IBM: 8.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
IBM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.93  Med: 9.5 Max: 12.94
Current: 8.29
5.93
12.94
EV-to-EBIT 13.21
IBM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
64% of the 1537 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 18.10 vs. IBM: 13.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
IBM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.5  Med: 11.2 Max: 15.9
Current: 13.21
7.5
15.9
EV-to-EBITDA 9.63
IBM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
68% of the 1661 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 14.06 vs. IBM: 9.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
IBM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.7  Med: 9 Max: 11.9
Current: 9.63
5.7
11.9
EV-to-Revenue 2.00
IBM's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
57% of the 2327 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.52 vs. IBM: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
IBM' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.2  Med: 2.2 Max: 2.6
Current: 2
1.2
2.6
Shiller PE Ratio 10.91
IBM's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 588 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 33.85 vs. IBM: 10.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
IBM' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.77  Med: 17.99 Max: 25.89
Current: 10.91
8.77
25.89
Current Ratio 1.29
IBM's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 2075 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.93 vs. IBM: 1.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
IBM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.08  Med: 1.21 Max: 1.65
Current: 1.29
1.08
1.65
Quick Ratio 1.24
IBM's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
69% of the 2075 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.78 vs. IBM: 1.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
IBM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.85  Med: 1.11 Max: 1.29
Current: 1.24
0.85
1.29
Days Inventory 14.81
IBM's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
52% of the 1270 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 16.77 vs. IBM: 14.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
IBM' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.34  Med: 16.31 Max: 18.24
Current: 14.81
13.34
18.24
Days Sales Outstanding 136.75
IBM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
85% of the 2082 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 66.86 vs. IBM: 136.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
IBM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 35.76  Med: 41.56 Max: 136.75
Current: 136.75
35.76
136.75
Days Payable 56.12
IBM's Days Payable is ranked higher than
57% of the 1870 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 44.89 vs. IBM: 56.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
IBM' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 52.22  Med: 53.8 Max: 56.12
Current: 56.12
52.22
56.12

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 4.54
IBM's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
92% of the 1450 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.55 vs. IBM: 4.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
IBM' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.24  Med: 2.01 Max: 5.6
Current: 4.54
1.24
5.6
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.65
IBM's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 919 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.33 vs. IBM: 0.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
IBM' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.26 Max: 0.96
Current: 0.65
0.22
0.96
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 7.50
IBM's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
55% of the 619 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.90 vs. IBM: 7.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
IBM' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -40.9  Med: 13.1 Max: 34.6
Current: 7.5
-40.9
34.6
Forward Dividend Yield % 4.53
IBM's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
88% of the 1375 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.79 vs. IBM: 4.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 7.68
IBM's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
92% of the 1422 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.13 vs. IBM: 7.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
IBM' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 3.4 Max: 9.48
Current: 7.68
2.1
9.48
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.00
IBM's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
94% of the 1507 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: -3.30 vs. IBM: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
IBM' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1  Med: 3.9 Max: 6.6
Current: 2
-1
6.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.93
IBM's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
85% of the 907 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.08 vs. IBM: 0.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
IBM' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.71  Med: 1.12 Max: 6.06
Current: 0.93
0.71
6.06
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.86
IBM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
62% of the 2062 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. IBM: 0.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
IBM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.9 Max: 1.53
Current: 0.86
0.24
1.53
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 7.57
IBM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
77% of the 2413 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.07 vs. IBM: 7.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
IBM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.3  Med: 8.9 Max: 13.4
Current: 7.57
6.3
13.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 2.81
IBM's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
68% of the 939 Companies
in the Global Information Technology Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.12 vs. IBM: 2.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
IBM' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.4  Med: 15.2 Max: 23.3
Current: 2.81
1.4
23.3

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $79,590.00
EPS (TTM) $ 9.51
Beta1.73
Volatility34.96%
52-Week Range $105.94 - 162.11
Shares Outstanding (Mil)908.79

Analyst Estimate

Dec19 Dec20 Dec21
Revenue (Mil $) 79,817 78,434 78,765
EBIT (Mil $) 13,139 13,517 13,819
EBITDA (Mil $) 17,669 18,107 18,158
EPS ($) 12.86 14.40 15.33
EPS without NRI ($) 12.86 14.40 15.33
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
4.90%
Dividends per Share ($) 6.52 6.56 6.79

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 77
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}