Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 2.45
MLR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
73% of the 1241 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.75 vs. MLR: 2.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
MLR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 1.53 Max: 18793.5
Current: 2.45
0.04
18793.5
Equity-to-Asset 0.61
MLR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
71% of the 1235 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. MLR: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
MLR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.62 Max: 0.84
Current: 0.61
0.09
0.84
Interest Coverage 23.83
MLR's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
55% of the 1098 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 18.66 vs. MLR: 23.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MLR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.65  Med: 26.91 Max: 63.25
Current: 23.83
4.65
63.25
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 4.32
Beneish M-Score: -2.55
WACC vs ROIC
5.04%
12.37%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 5.32
MLR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
52% of the 1244 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 5.42 vs. MLR: 5.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
MLR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.13  Med: 4.69 Max: 9.24
Current: 5.32
2.13
9.24
Net Margin % 3.39
MLR's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
55% of the 1244 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 4.01 vs. MLR: 3.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
MLR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.32  Med: 2.99 Max: 5.58
Current: 3.39
1.32
5.58
ROE % 11.19
MLR's ROE % is ranked higher than
59% of the 1220 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.90 vs. MLR: 11.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
MLR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.71  Med: 8.52 Max: 15.18
Current: 11.19
2.71
15.18
ROA % 6.77
MLR's ROA % is ranked higher than
69% of the 1259 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.99 vs. MLR: 6.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
MLR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.97  Med: 6.06 Max: 11.18
Current: 6.77
1.97
11.18
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 20.61
MLR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
65% of the 1254 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 14.15 vs. MLR: 20.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
MLR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.34  Med: 20.62 Max: 40.76
Current: 20.61
7.34
40.76
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 14.00
MLR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
85% of the 1091 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.40 vs. MLR: 14.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
MLR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.4  Med: 12.3 Max: 40.7
Current: 14
-29.4
40.7
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 26.60
MLR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
74% of the 1005 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 7.60 vs. MLR: 26.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
MLR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.1  Med: 2.1 Max: 57.3
Current: 26.6
-29.1
57.3
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 28.70
MLR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
78% of the 895 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 7.20 vs. MLR: 28.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
MLR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.5  Med: 8.7 Max: 119.6
Current: 28.7
-42.5
119.6
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Miller Industries Inc. $MLR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» MLR's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-03 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

MLR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 55,700 sh (+37.87%)
Charles Brandes 29,561 sh (+0.39%)
Chuck Royce 1,588,378 sh (+0.04%)
Robert Olstein 104,270 sh (-1.17%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,399,107 sh (-7.38%)
» More
Q3 2016

MLR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Robert Olstein 104,575 sh (+0.29%)
CI Can Am Small Cap 159,614 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 1,582,737 sh (-0.36%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,391,975 sh (-0.51%)
Jim Simons 55,200 sh (-0.90%)
Charles Brandes 29,271 sh (-0.98%)
» More
Q4 2016

MLR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Charles Brandes Sold Out
Chuck Royce 1,545,143 sh (-2.38%)
Jim Simons 52,400 sh (-5.07%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,187,745 sh (-14.67%)
Robert Olstein 87,236 sh (-16.58%)
» More
Q1 2017

MLR Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Chuck Royce 1,587,378 sh (+2.73%)
Robert Olstein 82,086 sh (-5.90%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,026,005 sh (-13.62%)
Jim Simons 43,900 sh (-16.22%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MLR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Auto Parts    NAICS: 336999    SIC: 3713
Compare:NAS:CVGI, OTCPK:TKTDY, OTCPK:EXCOF, NAS:WPRT, NAS:CAAS, NAS:VOXX, NAS:WKHS, OTCPK:IOCJY, NAS:STRT, OTCPK:ESSI, AMEX:UFAB, NYSE:ZX, OTCPK:AKBIY, NYSE:SRI, NYSE:SUP, NYSE:TOWR, AMEX:UQM, OTCPK:CRGS, NAS:SYPR, OTCPK:CTXR » details
Headquarter Location:USA
Miller Industries Inc., is the manufacturer of towing and recovery equipment. It products are marketed under the brand names of Century, Challenger, Holmes, Champion, Eagle, Titan, Jige, Boniface, Vulcan, and Chevron.

Miller Industries Inc., was founded in 1994 and is based in Ooltewah,Tennessee. The Company is the manufacturer of towing and recovery equipment, with executive offices in Ooltewah, Tennessee, domestic manufacturing operations in Tennessee and Pennsylvania, and foreign manufacturing operations in France and the United Kingdom. The Company provides a range of towing and recovery equipment products that meet customer design, capacity and cost requirements. It manufactures the bodies of wreckers and car carriers, which are installed on truck chassis manufactured by third parties. The Company manufactures a broad line of wrecker, car carrier and trailer bodies to meet a full range of customer design, capacity and cost requirements. Wreckers are generally used to recover and tow disabled vehicles and other equipment and range in type from the conventional tow truck to large recovery vehicles with up to 75-ton lifting capacities. Car carriers are specialized flat-bed vehicles with hydraulic tilt mechanisms that enable a towing operator to drive or winch a vehicle onto the bed for transport. Car carriers are used to transport new or disabled vehicles and other equipment and are particularly effective for transporting vehicles or other equipment over longer distances. Its multi-vehicle transport trailers are specialized auto transport trailers with upper and lower decks and hydraulic ramps for loading vehicles. These trailers are used for moving multiple vehicles for auto auctions, car dealerships, leasing companies and other similar applications. It manufactures and markets its wreckers, car carriers and trailers under ten separate brand names. It purchases raw materials and component parts from a number of sources. Management categorizes the towing and recovery market into three general product types: light duty wreckers; heavy duty wreckers; and car carriers. The light duty wrecker market consists of professional wrecker operators, repossession towing services, local and national governmental entities and repair shop or salvages company owners. The heavy duty market includes professional wrecker operators serving the needs of commercial vehicle operators as well as governmental entities. The car carrier market has expanded to include equipment rental companies that offer delivery service and professional towing operators who desire to complement their existing towing capabilities. The towing and recovery equipment manufacturing industry is competitive for sales to distributors and towing operators. Its operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment. Its products are sold through independent distributors that serve all 50 states, Canada and Mexico, and other foreign markets including Europe, the Pacific Rim, the Middle East, South America and Africa, and through prime contractors to government

Top Ranked Articles about Miller Industries Inc.

Melior Announces Filing of Third Quarter Financials and MD&A

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - May 25, 2016) - Melior Resources Inc. ("Melior" or the "Company") (TSX VENTURE:MLR) announces that it has filed its financial statements and related management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016 (the "Financials"). A copy of the Financials is available on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com and the Company's website at www.meliorresources.com. Forward Looking Statements Disclaimer Statements made in this news release may be forward-looking and therefore subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such statements can typically be identified by terminology such as "may", "will", "could", "should", "expect", "plan", "anticipate", "believe", "intend", "possible", "continue", "objective" or other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Certain material factors or assumptions are applied in making forward-looking statements and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Melior does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements; such statements speak only as at the date made. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.





Thomas Masney
Chief Financial Officer
416-644-1217




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 13.53
MLR's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
58% of the 1026 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 17.93 vs. MLR: 13.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
MLR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.53  Med: 14.57 Max: 30.71
Current: 13.53
3.53
30.71
PE Ratio without NRI 13.53
MLR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
58% of the 1023 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 17.86 vs. MLR: 13.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
MLR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.37  Med: 14.57 Max: 30.71
Current: 13.53
6.37
30.71
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 21.02
MLR's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
73% of the 566 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 17.08 vs. MLR: 21.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
MLR' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.56  Med: 15.79 Max: 243.52
Current: 21.02
3.56
243.52
PB Ratio 1.48
MLR's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 1212 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. MLR: 1.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
MLR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 1.23 Max: 3.18
Current: 1.48
0.43
3.18
PS Ratio 0.45
MLR's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 1220 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.83 vs. MLR: 0.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
MLR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.5 Max: 0.72
Current: 0.45
0.2
0.72
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 10.84
MLR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
75% of the 647 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.70 vs. MLR: 10.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
MLR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.63  Med: 12.66 Max: 182.31
Current: 10.84
3.63
182.31
EV-to-EBIT 8.19
MLR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
75% of the 1383 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 13.17 vs. MLR: 8.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MLR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.3  Med: 8 Max: 13.8
Current: 8.19
3.3
13.8
EV-to-EBITDA 7.08
MLR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
59% of the 1412 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 9.05 vs. MLR: 7.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MLR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 6.9 Max: 10.3
Current: 7.08
3
10.3
PEG Ratio 2.77
MLR's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
84% of the 579 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.63 vs. MLR: 2.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
MLR' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.51  Med: 1.69 Max: 73.57
Current: 2.77
0.51
73.57
Shiller PE Ratio 20.61
MLR's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
66% of the 207 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 28.83 vs. MLR: 20.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
MLR' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.44  Med: 15.03 Max: 302
Current: 20.61
11.44
302
Current Ratio 2.11
MLR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 1111 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. MLR: 2.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MLR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 2.36 Max: 4.23
Current: 2.11
0.92
4.23
Quick Ratio 1.49
MLR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
69% of the 1111 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. MLR: 1.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MLR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 1.61 Max: 2.89
Current: 1.49
0.53
2.89
Days Inventory 46.06
MLR's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
64% of the 1204 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 57.00 vs. MLR: 46.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MLR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 43.77  Med: 48.25 Max: 71.43
Current: 46.06
43.77
71.43
Days Sales Outstanding 80.54
MLR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
66% of the 999 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 61.70 vs. MLR: 80.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MLR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 54.03  Med: 71.05 Max: 86.29
Current: 80.54
54.03
86.29
Days Payable 59.60
MLR's Days Payable is ranked higher than
52% of the 956 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 55.61 vs. MLR: 59.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MLR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 34.54  Med: 45.01 Max: 59.6
Current: 59.6
34.54
59.6

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.83
MLR's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
67% of the 1322 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.95 vs. MLR: 2.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
MLR' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 2.96 Max: 3.64
Current: 2.83
0.6
3.64
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.39
MLR's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
65% of the 861 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. MLR: 0.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
MLR' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.45 Max: 0.68
Current: 0.39
0.1
0.68
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 6.70
MLR's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
56% of the 661 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 9.70 vs. MLR: 6.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
MLR' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 77.6
Current: 6.7
0
77.6
Forward Dividend Yield % 3.02
MLR's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
67% of the 1291 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.09 vs. MLR: 3.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 4.01
MLR's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
63% of the 1603 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.78 vs. MLR: 4.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
MLR' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.85  Med: 4.19 Max: 5.15
Current: 4.01
0.85
5.15
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.20
MLR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
69% of the 570 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: -2.10 vs. MLR: -0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MLR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.3  Med: -0.5 Max: 1.7
Current: -0.2
-16.3
1.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 2.53
MLR's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked higher than
74% of the 523 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 5.88 vs. MLR: 2.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
MLR' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 2.01 Max: 89.4
Current: 2.53
0
89.4
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.59
MLR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
53% of the 1164 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.87 vs. MLR: 1.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
MLR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.46 Max: 8.27
Current: 1.59
0.39
8.27
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.22
MLR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
50% of the 604 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. MLR: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
MLR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.86 Max: 1.98
Current: 1.22
0
1.98
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.92
MLR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
75% of the 1091 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. MLR: 0.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
MLR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1 Max: 6.83
Current: 0.92
0
6.83
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 1.01
MLR's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
71% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. MLR: 1.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
MLR' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.35 Max: 3.88
Current: 1.01
0
3.88
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.98
MLR's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
56% of the 833 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. MLR: 0.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
MLR' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.11 Max: 5.63
Current: 0.98
0
5.63
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 12.19
MLR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
77% of the 1578 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 6.83 vs. MLR: 12.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
MLR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.3  Med: 12.4 Max: 30.1
Current: 12.19
7.3
30.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 13.47
MLR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
57% of the 748 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 7.34 vs. MLR: 13.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
MLR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.5  Med: 6.7 Max: 22.1
Current: 13.47
-13.5
22.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $601.2
EPS (TTM) $ 1.80
Beta0.43
Short Percentage of Float1.08%
52-Week Range $19.86 - 28.85
Shares Outstanding (Mil)11.35
» More Articles for MLR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Miller Industries Reports 2017 First Quarter Results May 03 2017 
Miller Industries Announces Webcast Apr 27 2017 
Charles Brandes Continues to Invests in Pain Therapeutics Sep 06 2016 
Melior Announces Filing of Third Quarter Financials and MD&A May 25 2016 
Melior Announces Filing of Second Quarter Financials and MD&A Feb 18 2016 
Melior Announces Filing of Annual Financials and MD&A Oct 23 2015 
Melior Resources Inc. Announces Strategic Update for the Goondicum Project Aug 02 2015 
Melior Resources Inc. Announces Operational and Strategic Update for the Goondicum Project Jul 08 2015 
Guru Stocks Raising Dividends: PNY, MLR, MAIN, GD, SPLS Mar 11 2012 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 09 2010 

More From Other Websites
Edited Transcript of MLR earnings conference call or presentation 4-May-17 2:00pm GMT May 11 2017
Miller Industries posts 1Q profit May 03 2017
Miller Industries Reports 2017 First Quarter Results May 03 2017
Cummins Breaks Out On Heavy-Duty Earnings Growth May 02 2017
Miller Industries Announces Webcast Apr 27 2017
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : MLR-US: Dividend Analysis : March 27th, 2017 (record date) :... Apr 10 2017
ETFs with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : April 7, 2017 Apr 07 2017
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) :MLR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : March 22,... Mar 22 2017
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) :MLR-US: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : March 21, 2017 Mar 21 2017
Miller Industries Reports 2016 Fourth Quarter And Full Year Results Mar 15 2017
Miller Industries Announces Revised Schedule For Earnings Webcast Mar 06 2017
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : MLR-US: Dividend Analysis : December 05th, 2016 (record date)... Jan 27 2017
ETFs with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : January 9, 2017 Jan 09 2017
ETFs with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : December 13, 2016 Dec 13 2016
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) :MLR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2016 By the Numbers : November... Nov 23 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : September 15, 2016 Sep 15 2016
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : MLR-US: Dividend Analysis : September 12th, 2016 (record date)... Sep 14 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat