Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.09
QSR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
86% of the 323 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.67 vs. QSR: 0.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
QSR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 0.15 Max: N/A
Current: 0.09
Equity-to-Asset 0.09
QSR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
91% of the 321 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. QSR: 0.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
QSR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.09 Max: 0.09
Current: 0.09
0.07
0.09
Interest Coverage 3.64
QSR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
83% of the 274 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 23.97 vs. QSR: 3.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
QSR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 2.47 Max: 3.64
Current: 3.64
0.64
3.64
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 0.96
Beneish M-Score: -2.88
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 39.54
QSR's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
97% of the 323 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 5.36 vs. QSR: 39.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
QSR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.11  Med: 29.42 Max: 45.56
Current: 39.54
15.11
45.56
Net Margin % 14.56
QSR's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
90% of the 323 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 3.19 vs. QSR: 14.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
QSR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.97  Med: 13.46 Max: 20.39
Current: 14.56
5.97
20.39
ROE % 20.34
QSR's ROE % is ranked higher than
82% of the 305 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 8.54 vs. QSR: 20.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
QSR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -24.34  Med: 14.8 Max: 30.83
Current: 20.34
-24.34
30.83
ROA % 3.16
QSR's ROA % is ranked lower than
56% of the 324 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 4.15 vs. QSR: 3.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
QSR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.21  Med: 2.65 Max: 8.02
Current: 3.16
1.21
8.02
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 77.65
QSR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
87% of the 321 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 18.32 vs. QSR: 77.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
QSR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.83  Med: 66.6 Max: 127.32
Current: 77.65
1.83
127.32
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with Restaurant Brands International Inc $QSR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» QSR's 30-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Restaurants » Restaurants    NAICS: 722511    SIC: 9211
Compare:NYSE:YUMC, NYSE:CMG, NYSE:DRI, NYSE:DPZ, NYSE:ARMK, OTCPK:WTBCY, NAS:PNRA, NAS:DNKN, OTCPK:JBFCF, NAS:CBRL, NAS:WEN, NAS:TXRH, OTCPK:DMZPY, OTCPK:ALSSF, OTCPK:ATGSF, NYSE:YUM, NAS:JACK, OTCPK:SKLYF, NAS:PLAY, NAS:PZZA » details
Traded in other countries:QSR.Canada, QSR N.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:Canada
Restaurant Brands International Inc is a quick service restaurant company. It owns and operates restaurants brands include Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen.

The consolidation of Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen as Restaurant Brands International creates the third-largest global QSR chain, with $27.9 billion in system sales and 23,000 units in 2016 (99% franchised). Revenue comes largely from franchise royalties and distribution sales to franchisees. Worldwide, there were 15,800 Burger King locations, 4,600 Tim Hortons locations, and 2,700 Popeyes locations as of March 2017.

Guru Investment Theses on Restaurant Brands International Inc

Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands International - May 12, 2017

QSR (NYSE:QSR) delivered strong earnings growth in the first quarter as the company maintained a high level of net unit growth and continued to achieve cost and capital efficiencies at Tim Hortons. Same-store sales growth decelerated from the pace of previous quarters and was roughly flat with prior year levels at both Burger King and Tim Hortons. QSR launched several new products during the second quarter including espresso-based drinks at Tim Hortons and the Steakhouse King hamburger at Burger King. These new offerings should help drive improved same-store sales results in future quarters.

QSR achieved net unit growth of 5% at both concepts and continued to enter into development agreements in new markets. QSR made additional progress improving Tim Hortons’ cost structure as it increased margins in the distribution businesses by nearly 300 basis points and further reduced the company’s capital requirements. As a result of the net unit growth and further cost efficiencies, organic EBITDA grew 7% and EPS grew nearly 20%.

QSR completed the acquisition of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen at the end of March. We believe that QSR can meaningfully improve Popeye’s cost structure and can dramatically accelerate its unit growth, which will further enhance the company’s future growth profile.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s first quarter 2017 shareholder letter.


Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands International - May 08, 2017

QSR’s franchised business model is best described as a capital-light, high-growth annuity. The company earns high-margin, brand royalty franchise fees (4% to 5% of unit sales) from Burger King and Tim Hortons franchisee operated stores which are relatively insulated from economic cycles. As a result of the business’ structure and the market in which it operates, significant unit growth requires no capital from QSR (NYSE:QSR).

The company’s controlling shareholder 3G is an ideal operating partner and sponsor. It has installed an excellent management team and created a unique and impactful performance culture, compensation system, and business processes. We believe 3G’s highly scalable and replicable operating strategy can be applied to potential future acquisition opportunities.

QSR’s intrinsic value meaningfully increased in 2016, as the company continued to deliver strong financial performance: 16% organic EBITDA growth and 45% EPS growth. The high rate of EBITDA growth was driven by 2% Same-Store Sales (SSS) growth at Burger King and 3% at Tim Hortons, 5% net unit growth at both concepts, and continued cost reduction at Tim Hortons. QSR improved Tim Hortons’ EBITDA margins by 500 basis points in 2016, due to margin improvement in both the franchise and distribution businesses and a 12% reduction in overhead costs. QSR’s reported EBITDA grew 13%, including a 3% headwind from foreign exchange.

As a result of the positive business momentum, the total return for Restaurant Brands’ shares was 29.2% in 2016. In February 2017, QSR announced the acquisition of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen. We believe QSR will be able to meaningfully improve Popeye’s cost structure and significantly accelerate its growth in new units, which will further increase Restaurant Brands’ future earnings growth and intrinsic value.

From 2016 annual letter to shareholders of Pershing Square by Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio).

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands International - Mar 30, 2017



QSR (NYSE:QSR)’s franchised business model is best described as a capital-light, high-growth annuity. The company earns high-margin, brand royalty franchise fees (4% to 5% of unit sales) from Burger King and Tim Hortons franchisee operated stores which are relatively insulated from economic cycles. As a result of the business’ structure and the market in which it operates, significant unit growth requires no capital from QSR.

The company’s controlling shareholder 3G is an ideal operating partner and sponsor. It has installed an excellent management team and created a unique and impactful performance culture, compensation system, and business processes. We believe 3G’s highly scalable and replicable operating strategy can be applied to potential future acquisition opportunities.

QSR’s intrinsic value meaningfully increased in 2016, as the company continued to deliver strong financial performance: 16% organic EBITDA growth and 45% EPS growth. The high rate of EBITDA growth was driven by 2% Same-Store Sales (SSS) growth at Burger King and 3% at Tim Hortons, 5% net unit growth at both concepts, and continued cost reduction at Tim Hortons. QSR improved Tim Hortons’ EBITDA margins by 500 basis points in 2016, due to margin improvement in both the franchise and distribution businesses and a 12% reduction in overhead costs. QSR’s reported EBITDA grew 13%, including a 3% headwind from foreign exchange.

As a result of the positive business momentum, the total return for Restaurant Brands’ shares was 29.2% in 2016. In February 2017, QSR announced the acquisition of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen. We believe QSR will be able to meaningfully improve Popeye’s cost structure and significantly accelerate its growth in new units, which will further increase Restaurant Brands’ future earnings growth and intrinsic value.



From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s Pershing Square 2016 annual report.


Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands International - Dec 09, 2016

QSR (NYSE:QSR) reported strong results by executing on its three key growth drivers: same store sales, net unit growth, and operational efficiency. In the third quarter, the company generated 2% same store sales growth in its Burger King and Tim Hortons concepts. While same store sales growth has decelerated over the last few quarters, it is still at a healthy overall level. Strong international growth was partially offset by weaker U.S. performance at Burger King where same store sales declined 0.5%. The decline in the U.S. is partially due to a tough comparison with last year’s quarter’s 5% growth, but also reflects a more difficult industry environment as the recent decline in food costs has widened the price gap between restaurant and grocery to historically high levels, resulting in lower restaurant traffic.

QSR achieved net unit growth of 3% which management expects will accelerate in the fourth quarter. In addition, Tim Hortons recently announced two master franchise agreements in the U.K. and the Philippines, which should accelerate future growth.

QSR continues to improve the efficiency of Tim Hortons’ cost structure by reducing overhead costs by more than 8% this quarter and meaningfully increasing margins in the franchised and distribution businesses.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s Pershing Square third-quarter shareholder letter.

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands - Aug 29, 2016

Restaurant Brands (NYSE:QSR) reported another strong quarter of underlying earnings in the second quarter of 2016. The company continued to deliver strong net unit growth at both concepts while substantially improving Tim Hortons' cost structure. Same-store-sales growth decelerated from prior quarters against a backdrop of slowing growth for the U.S. fast-food industry.

Same-store-sales for the quarter grew nearly 1% at Burger King and 3% at Tim Hortons. Same-store-sales for Burger King's U.S. business declined 1% in the second quarter, due in part to the industry slowdown and a tough comparison against nearly 8% growth in last year's second quarter. Over time, we expect Burger King's U.S. same-store sales to increase at a healthy rate as the company narrows the sales gap with its key U.S. competitors. Net units grew 4% and the development pipeline remains strong. As a result of same-store-sales and net unit growth, Restaurant Brands' organic revenue grew 4%.

The company continued to reduce Tim Hortons' overhead costs and improve margins in its franchised operations and distribution businesses. As a result of strong top-line trends and cost reduction initiatives, Restaurant Brands grew organic EBITDA 16% this quarter. Although the strengthening USD remained a headwind, Restaurant Brands' reported EBITDA grew 12%.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s mid-year 2016 letter.

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands International - May 11, 2016

Restaurant Brands (NYSE:QSR) reported another strong quarter of underlying earnings with its results for the first quarter of 2016. The company continues to deliver strong same-store-sales growth and net unit growth at both concepts and continues to improve Tim Hortons’ cost structure.

Same-store-sales this quarter grew 5% at Burger King and 6% at Tim Hortons as continued new product innovation, such as Grilled Dogs at Burger King and croissant breakfast sandwiches at Tim’s, drove improved results. Same-store-sales growth at Burger King U.S. was 4%, which highlights the progress the company is making in narrowing the sales gap between Burger King and its key U.S. competitors. Net units grew 4% at both concepts and management indicated that they have a strong development pipeline for new stores this year. As a result, Restaurant Brands’ organic revenue growth was 6%.

In addition to strong organic revenue growth, the company continued to reduce Tim Hortons’ overhead costs and improve margins in its franchised operations and distribution businesses. As a result of strong top-line trends and cost reduction, Restaurant Brands grew organic EBITDA 23% this quarter. Although the strengthening USD remained a materially negative headwind, Restaurant Brands’ reported EBITDA still grew 15%, which is the highest level of growth the company has achieved since the Tim’s acquisition.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s first quarter shareholder letter.

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands International - Dec 16, 2015

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR)

QSR delivered another strong quarter of earnings, consistent with our belief that the company will produce a high rate of earnings growth over the coming years. QSR continues to deliver strong improvement in Burger King (BKW) U.S. same-store sales (SSS) growth. This quarter SSS grew 5% which is at the top of the QSR industry once again. This is also QSR’s eighth consecutive quarter of positive comps. New product innovations, improved service, and the increasingly remodeled store footprint are contributing to increased growth.

Despite its industry-leading SSS growth in recent quarters, BKW still operates at sales-per-store that are well below its peers, Wendy’s and McDonalds. Closing this gap will provide QSR with an additional significant driver of earnings growth over the coming years.

Tim Hortons’ (THI) overhead cost declined by nearly 40% this quarter, accelerating the rate of cost reduction achieved in prior quarters. Importantly, QSR is improving the brand’s operating efficiency while maintaining THI’s high level of SSS growth and increasing unit count.

Strong sales improvement at BKW’s U.S. business, and operational efficiencies at THI were two important factors, when combined with strong restaurant unit growth, that allowed QSR to grow EBITDA by 6% and EPS by 33%, in spite of the strengthening U.S. dollar, which negatively impacted results by more than 12%.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s Pershing Square Holdings third quarter 2015 letter to shareholders.

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands International - Sep 11, 2015

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR)



QSR delivered another strong quarter of earnings. The company’s Burger King (BKW) division achieved substantial improvement in same store sales (SSS) in the U.S. SSS grew an industry-leading 8% during the quarter, the best result that BKW has delivered in nearly a decade. The company attributes its growth to a combination of factors, including recently remodeled stores, strong limited-time product offerings, an enhanced value menu, and improved service times.



This is BKW’s second consecutive quarter of industry-leading SSS growth, which suggests that BKW is beginning to close the revenue gap with its peers, a gap which has persisted for more than a decade. BKW generates $1.3 million in revenue per store compared to $1.5 million for Wendy’s and $2.4 million for McDonalds. Closing this revenue gap will be a significant driver of earnings growth over the coming years.



The significant reduction in Tim Hortons’ cost structure is an important highlight of QSR’s recent results. Although QSR has owned Tim Hortons for only two quarters, it has decreased overhead by more than 30% and begun to reduce its core operating expenses. Importantly, QSR is improving the brand’s operating efficiency while enhancing its strong growth profile.



Strong sales improvements at BKW’s U.S. business and operational efficiencies at Tim Hortons, combined with strong unit growth, enabled QSR to increase quarterly earnings per share by 27%, despite the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, which negatively impacted results by more than 10%.





From Pershing Square's semi-annual 2015 report.



Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Restaurant Brands International Inc

Restaurant Brands International Inc. Announces Election of Directors
Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands International Guru stock highlight
QSR (NYSE:QSR) delivered strong earnings growth in the first quarter as the company maintained a high level of net unit growth and continued to achieve cost and capital efficiencies at Tim Hortons. Same-store sales growth decelerated from the pace of previous quarters and was roughly flat with prior year levels at both Burger King and Tim Hortons. QSR launched several new products during the second quarter including espresso-based drinks at Tim Hortons and the Steakhouse King hamburger at Burger King. These new offerings should help drive improved same-store sales results in future quarters. Read more...
5 Companies Hit 52-Week Highs Home Depot among stocks achieving milestones
According to GuruFocus' list, these stocks have reached their 52-week highs. Read more...
Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands International Guru stock highlight
QSR’s franchised business model is best described as a capital-light, high-growth annuity. The company earns high-margin, brand royalty franchise fees (4% to 5% of unit sales) from Burger King and Tim Hortons franchisee operated stores which are relatively insulated from economic cycles. As a result of the business’ structure and the market in which it operates, significant unit growth requires no capital from QSR (NYSE:QSR). Read more...
Restaurant Brands International Inc. Announces Pricing and Upsizing of First Lien Senior Secured Notes Offering and Revised Sizing of Additional Borrowings Under its Existing First Lien Term Loan Facility
Restaurant Brands International Inc. Announces Launch of First Lien Senior Secured Notes Offering and Intention to Increase Borrowings Under its Existing First Lien Term Loan Facility
Bill Ackman Is Back to Black Pershing returns exceed one percent for the first time in almost two years with Valeant gone
Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio), head of Pershing Square Capital Management, may be seeing the beginning of pull out of a long slog that submerged his fund for months. Read more...
Restaurant Brands International Inc. to Report First Quarter 2017 Results on April 26, 2017
Restaurant Brands International Inc. announces agreement to grow the BURGER KING® brand in sub-Saharan Africa
Bill Ackman Comments on Restaurant Brands International Guru stock highlight
QSR (NYSE:QSR)’s franchised business model is best described as a capital-light, high-growth annuity. The company earns high-margin, brand royalty franchise fees (4% to 5% of unit sales) from Burger King and Tim Hortons franchisee operated stores which are relatively insulated from economic cycles. As a result of the business’ structure and the market in which it operates, significant unit growth requires no capital from QSR.

The company’s controlling shareholder 3G is an ideal operating partner and sponsor. It has installed an excellent management team and created a unique and impactful performance culture, compensation system, and business processes. We believe 3G’s highly scalable and replicable operating strategy can be applied to potential future acquisition opportunities.

QSR’s intrinsic value meaningfully increased in 2016, as the company continued to deliver strong financial performance: 16% organic EBITDA growth and 45% EPS growth. The high rate of EBITDA growth was driven by 2% Same-Store Sales (SSS) growth at Burger King and 3% at Tim Hortons, 5% net unit growth at both concepts, and continued cost reduction at Tim Hortons. QSR improved Tim Hortons’ EBITDA margins by 500 basis points in 2016, due to margin improvement in both the franchise and distribution businesses and a 12% reduction in overhead costs. QSR’s reported EBITDA grew 13%, including a 3% headwind from foreign exchange.

As a result of the positive business momentum, the total return for Restaurant Brands’ shares was 29.2% in 2016. In February 2017, QSR announced the acquisition of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen. We believe QSR will be able to meaningfully improve Popeye’s cost structure and significantly accelerate its growth in new units, which will further increase Restaurant Brands’ future earnings growth and intrinsic value.



From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s Pershing Square 2016 annual report. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 43.39
QSR's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
79% of the 235 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 24.59 vs. QSR: 43.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
QSR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 33.48  Med: 40.58 Max: 76.94
Current: 43.39
33.48
76.94
PE Ratio without NRI 43.39
QSR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
78% of the 237 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 24.55 vs. QSR: 43.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
QSR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 33.48  Med: 40.58 Max: 76.94
Current: 43.39
33.48
76.94
PB Ratio 8.20
QSR's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
89% of the 301 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 3.00 vs. QSR: 8.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
QSR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.8  Med: 5.75 Max: 8.21
Current: 8.2
3.8
8.21
PS Ratio 6.99
QSR's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
94% of the 316 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. QSR: 6.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
QSR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.98  Med: 5.57 Max: 14.7
Current: 6.99
3.98
14.7
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 22.21
QSR's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
58% of the 130 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 27.56 vs. QSR: 22.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
QSR' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.79  Med: 19.96 Max: 80.79
Current: 22.21
14.79
80.79
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 21.69
QSR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
79% of the 173 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 11.70 vs. QSR: 21.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
QSR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.37  Med: 19.49 Max: 70.66
Current: 21.69
13.37
70.66
EV-to-EBIT 15.63
QSR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
59% of the 253 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 17.65 vs. QSR: 15.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
QSR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.5  Med: 23.7 Max: 1406.1
Current: 15.63
15.5
1406.1
EV-to-EBITDA 14.13
QSR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
55% of the 271 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 13.14 vs. QSR: 14.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
QSR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.01  Med: 20.9 Max: 323
Current: 14.13
14.01
323
Current Ratio 1.24
QSR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 314 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. QSR: 1.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
QSR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.22  Med: 1.38 Max: 1.83
Current: 1.24
1.22
1.83
Quick Ratio 1.17
QSR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 314 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. QSR: 1.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
QSR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.15  Med: 1.31 Max: 1.73
Current: 1.17
1.15
1.73
Days Inventory 13.65
QSR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
54% of the 303 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 12.00 vs. QSR: 13.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
QSR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 12.96 Max: 53.82
Current: 13.65
0.63
53.82
Days Sales Outstanding 31.74
QSR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
85% of the 265 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 8.42 vs. QSR: 31.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
QSR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 31.74  Med: 46.84 Max: 136.43
Current: 31.74
31.74
136.43

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.12
QSR's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
61% of the 309 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.53 vs. QSR: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
QSR' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 1.17 Max: 1.33
Current: 1.12
0.22
1.33
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.35
QSR's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
54% of the 201 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.38 vs. QSR: 0.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
QSR' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 0.65 Max: 0.88
Current: 0.35
0.35
0.88
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.23
QSR's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
66% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.80 vs. QSR: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.12
QSR's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
68% of the 375 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 2.21 vs. QSR: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
QSR' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 1.17 Max: 1.33
Current: 1.12
0.22
1.33

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.25
QSR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
57% of the 285 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. QSR: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
QSR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.81  Med: 0.96 Max: 2.17
Current: 1.25
0.81
2.17
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 6.42
QSR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
68% of the 323 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 4.66 vs. QSR: 6.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
QSR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 4.2 Max: 6.47
Current: 6.42
0.1
6.47

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $4,227.90
EPS (TTM) $ 1.44
Short Percentage of Float2.65%
52-Week Range $39.28 - 62.90
Shares Outstanding (Mil)235.62
» More Articles for QSR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
STORE Capital: Thank You, Warren Buffett Jun 28 2017 
Test2 Jun 28 2017 
US Market Indexes Higher on Wednesday Jun 28 2017 
Test Jun 28 2017 
British Pound Moving Higher Against US Dollar Jun 28 2017 
Bain Capital's Offer to Buy German Stada Falls Through Jun 28 2017 
Test Jun 28 2017 
Growing Competition Will Continue to Hurt Fitbit Jun 28 2017 
Rich Cigars Debuts in the OTC Pink Sheets Market Jun 28 2017 
Some More Timeless Advice From the Intelligent Investor Jun 28 2017 

More From Other Websites
Russian Burger King to Accept Bitcoin Payments Jun 28 2017
BURGER KING® Restaurants in Canada Launch $1.50 Original Chicken Sandwich Promotion to Celebrate... Jun 28 2017
The passive investing revolution is leaving opportunities in its wake Jun 23 2017
Can A New Tim Hortons CEO Help Solve RBI's Challenges? Jun 23 2017
BURGER KING® Restaurants Introduce New Lucky Charms™ Shake Jun 20 2017
Burger King Reveals a Milkshake Made From Lucky Charms (Yes, For Real) Jun 20 2017
Tim Hortons Franchisee Suing Restaurant Brands Int'l Over Ad Fund Jun 19 2017
ETFs with exposure to Restaurant Brands International, Inc. : June 15, 2017 Jun 15 2017
Burger King, Popeyes Parent Takes Another Bite At A Breakout Jun 15 2017
The Wall Street prodigy who took over Burger King when he was 32 reveals the best advice he ever... Jun 15 2017
3 Unique Catalysts On The Horizon For Restaurant Brands Jun 14 2017
Two Reasons Why Restaurant Brands' Earnings May Surprise On The Upside Jun 14 2017
Restaurant Brands International, Inc. – Value Analysis (NYSE:QSR) : June 13, 2017 Jun 13 2017
How a 36-year-old Wall Street prodigy saved Burger King Jun 12 2017
Restaurant Brands International, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner :... Jun 12 2017
Looking for Value? Why It Might Be Time to Try BG Staffing (BGSF) Jun 08 2017
Restaurant Brands International Inc. Announces Election of Directors Jun 06 2017
Burger King Pulls Ad After Trying to Dethrone Belgium's Monarch Jun 01 2017
Better Buy: Shake Shack Inc. vs. Burger King (RBI) Jun 01 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}