Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.10
YUM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
76% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.68 vs. YUM: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
YUM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.11 Max: 0.41
Current: 0.1
0.03
0.41
Equity-to-Asset -1.40
YUM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
99% of the 331 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. YUM: -1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
YUM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.4  Med: 0.15 Max: 0.3
Current: -1.4
-1.4
0.3
Debt-to-Equity -1.40
YUM's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 249 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. YUM: -1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
YUM' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -38.9  Med: 1.45 Max: 30.97
Current: -1.4
-38.9
30.97
Debt-to-EBITDA 4.97
YUM's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
64% of the 234 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 2.32 vs. YUM: 4.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
YUM' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.05  Med: 1.61 Max: 5.18
Current: 4.97
1.05
5.18
Interest Coverage 3.86
YUM's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
68% of the 278 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 23.62 vs. YUM: 3.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
YUM' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.73  Med: 8.44 Max: 12.65
Current: 3.86
3.73
12.65
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 2.86
Beneish M-Score: -2.85
WACC vs ROIC
5.25%
47.09%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 28.96
YUM's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
98% of the 333 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 5.08 vs. YUM: 28.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
YUM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.42  Med: 15.94 Max: 28.96
Current: 28.96
13.42
28.96
Net Margin % 25.60
YUM's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
96% of the 333 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. YUM: 25.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
YUM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.34  Med: 11.08 Max: 25.85
Current: 25.6
8.34
25.85
ROA % 28.33
YUM's ROA % is ranked higher than
98% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 3.60 vs. YUM: 28.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
YUM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.32  Med: 15.52 Max: 28.33
Current: 28.33
12.32
28.33
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 90.67
YUM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
94% of the 332 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 15.69 vs. YUM: 90.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
YUM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 34.16  Med: 46.26 Max: 90.67
Current: 90.67
34.16
90.67
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 4.40
YUM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
52% of the 282 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 4.10 vs. YUM: 4.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
YUM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.5  Med: 5.75 Max: 13.6
Current: 4.4
-20.5
13.6
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 9.20
YUM's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
91% of the 258 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 5.60 vs. YUM: 9.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
YUM' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.3  Med: 6.85 Max: 16.3
Current: 9.2
-12.3
16.3
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 19.30
YUM's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
68% of the 225 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 10.50 vs. YUM: 19.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
YUM' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 11.7 Max: 19.3
Current: 19.3
0
19.3
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Yum Brands Inc YUM.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» YUM's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-08-03)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2017

YUM Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Pioneer Investments 1,412,000 sh (New)
Lee Ainslie 35,870 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 477,427 sh (+12.58%)
Jeff Auxier 13,337 sh (unchged)
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund 1,174,410 sh (unchged)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc Sold Out
John Burbank Sold Out
Jim Simons 2,624,500 sh (-0.03%)
Paul Tudor Jones 36,807 sh (-27.24%)
Caxton Associates 100,000 sh (-53.47%)
Steven Cohen 24,900 sh (-90.84%)
» More
Q3 2017

YUM Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Pioneer Investments 1,778,900 sh (+25.98%)
Jeff Auxier 13,337 sh (unchged)
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund 1,174,410 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Lee Ainslie Sold Out
Caxton Associates 73,800 sh (-26.20%)
Joel Greenblatt 286,816 sh (-39.92%)
» More
Q4 2017

YUM Guru Trades in Q4 2017

Tom Russo 1,200 sh (New)
Lee Ainslie 205,620 sh (New)
Ken Fisher 3,065 sh (New)
Jim Simons 722,100 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 351,294 sh (+22.48%)
Pioneer Investments 2,128,020 sh (+19.63%)
Jeff Auxier 13,337 sh (unchged)
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund 579,910 sh (-50.62%)
Caxton Associates 16,316 sh (-77.89%)
» More
Q1 2018

YUM Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Paul Tudor Jones 28,360 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 461,839 sh (+31.47%)
Ken Fisher 3,911 sh (+27.60%)
Pioneer Investments 2,143,947 sh (+0.75%)
Jeff Auxier 13,337 sh (unchged)
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund Sold Out
Tom Russo Sold Out
Lee Ainslie Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Caxton Associates 14,617 sh (-10.41%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with YUM

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Joel Greenblatt 2018-03-31 Add 31.47%0.13%$76.3 - $86.48 $ 82.811%461,839
Ken Fisher 2018-03-31 Add 27.60%$76.3 - $86.48 $ 82.811%3,911
Joel Greenblatt 2017-12-31 Add 22.48%0.08%$73.75 - $83.4 $ 82.815%351,294
Ken Fisher 2017-12-31 New Buy$73.75 - $83.4 $ 82.815%3,065
Joel Greenblatt 2017-09-30 Reduce -39.92%0.2%$72.65 - $77.8 $ 82.8110%286,816
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 Add 12.58%0.05%$63.55 - $74.82 $ 82.8119%477,427
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Restaurants » Restaurants    NAICS: 722511    SIC: 5812
Compare:LSE:CPG, NYSE:YUMC, TSX:QSR, TSX:QSP.UN, NYSE:CMG, NYSE:DRI, LSE:WTB, NYSE:DPZ, NYSE:ARMK, TSE:2702, PHS:JFC, BKK:MINT-F, NAS:DNKN, NAS:TXRH, LSE:SSPG, NAS:WEN, NAS:CBRL, TSE:7550, MIL:AGL, MEX:ALSEA » details
Traded in other countries:TGR.Germany, YUM.Switzerland, 0QYD.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
Yum Brands Inc is engaged in operating quick-service restaurant systems. The company's restaurant brands includes KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell .

As the parent for almost 45,100 restaurant locations, Yum Brands operates one of the largest global quick-service restaurant systems. Concepts include KFC (21,500 units), Pizza Hut (16,700), and Taco Bell (6,900). Yum Brands generated $47 billion in system sales in 2017 (53% KFC, 26% Pizza Hut, 22% Taco Bell). In November 2016, Yum China was spun out as a stand-alone company, but it is paying 3% of systemwide sales to Yum Brands annually as a trademark franchisee. The company plans to be 98% franchised by 2018.

Top Ranked Articles about Yum Brands Inc

KFC Makes A Splash With New Colonel-Shaped Pool Floatie To Crisp Up Your Summer, And He'll Even Hold Your Bucket Of Chicken And A Beverage
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund Adds 2 New Holdings, Cuts 3 Others in 1st Quarter Fund’s largest new position is in South Korean retailer
The Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (Trades, Portfolio) disclosed it established two new positions and closed three others when it released its first-quarter portfolio last week. Read more...
Pizza Hut® Expanding Beer Delivery Pilot To Nearly 100 Restaurants In Arizona And California
Report: Exploring Fundamental Drivers Behind Alcoa, FedEx, 22nd Century Group, Aspen Technology, Yum! Brands, and NVR — New Horizons, Emerging Trends, and Upcoming Developments
The Rush to Lead the Online Food Delivery Business GrubHub, after its meteoric climb in stock value, fell 10% on a rough day for the major indexes
The rush to the head of the online food delivery business is proving to be a major fight to the finish. Finicky investors pushed down shares of GrubHub Inc. (NYSE:GRUB) after a meteoric climb over the last 52 weeks of trading. Shares fell as much as 10% for the online and mobile food ordering company on the day it released strong quarterly results. Read more...
It's Not Over for the Big Mac McDonald's soared in trading after posting best sales performance in 6 years
Investors reacted with supersized enthusiasm when McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) posted its best sales performance in six years. Read more...
Raise A Slice: Pizza Hut® Celebrates 60 Years With New Double Cheesy Crust Pan Pizza
5 Companies Reach 52-Week Highs As of recently, multiple companies have achieved yearly highs
According to GuruFocus list of 52-week highs, these guru stocks have reached their 52-week highs. Read more...
KFC Pairs New Crispy Colonel Sandwich With Famously Sun-Crisped George Hamilton To Launch Latest Menu Item
5 Companies Hit 52-Week Highs Recently, multiple companies have all managed to reach yearly highs
According to GuruFocus list of 52-week highs, these Guru stocks have reached their 52-Week Highs. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 19.34
YUM's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
63% of the 236 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 25.91 vs. YUM: 19.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
YUM' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.82  Med: 15.88 Max: 32.47
Current: 19.34
8.82
32.47
PE Ratio without NRI 19.34
YUM's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
62% of the 237 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 25.39 vs. YUM: 19.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
YUM' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.82  Med: 16.1 Max: 42.8
Current: 19.34
8.82
42.8
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 16.35
YUM's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
71% of the 136 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 23.88 vs. YUM: 16.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
YUM' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.46  Med: 13.84 Max: 52.95
Current: 16.35
6.46
52.95
PS Ratio 4.96
YUM's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
91% of the 318 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. YUM: 4.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
YUM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.77  Med: 1.72 Max: 14.1
Current: 4.96
0.77
14.1
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 44.57
YUM's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
79% of the 127 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 22.97 vs. YUM: 44.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
YUM' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.01  Med: 20.03 Max: 86.63
Current: 44.57
13.01
86.63
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 31.02
YUM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
86% of the 174 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 12.27 vs. YUM: 31.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
YUM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.65  Med: 10.34 Max: 64.65
Current: 31.02
5.65
64.65
EV-to-EBIT 20.86
YUM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
75% of the 252 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 18.45 vs. YUM: 20.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
YUM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.8  Med: 12.1 Max: 32.4
Current: 20.86
7.8
32.4
EV-to-EBITDA 18.46
YUM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
61% of the 275 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 13.96 vs. YUM: 18.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
YUM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.7  Med: 9 Max: 26.5
Current: 18.46
5.7
26.5
EV-to-Revenue 6.05
YUM's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
93% of the 331 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. YUM: 6.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
YUM' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.1  Med: 1.9 Max: 18.6
Current: 6.05
1.1
18.6
Shiller PE Ratio 26.57
YUM's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
59% of the 78 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 30.20 vs. YUM: 26.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
YUM' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.78  Med: 22.66 Max: 28.54
Current: 26.57
12.78
28.54
Current Ratio 1.70
YUM's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
71% of the 321 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. YUM: 1.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
YUM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 0.65 Max: 1.74
Current: 1.7
0.33
1.74
Quick Ratio 1.70
YUM's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 321 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.98 vs. YUM: 1.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
YUM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.58 Max: 1.7
Current: 1.7
0.29
1.7
Days Inventory 3.60
YUM's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
91% of the 315 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 12.55 vs. YUM: 3.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
YUM' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.09  Med: 8.11 Max: 28.06
Current: 3.6
3.09
28.06
Days Sales Outstanding 31.36
YUM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
78% of the 271 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 9.04 vs. YUM: 31.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
YUM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.06  Med: 18.01 Max: 31.36
Current: 31.36
8.06
31.36
Days Payable 128.04
YUM's Days Payable is ranked lower than
88% of the 256 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 45.50 vs. YUM: 128.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
YUM' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.7  Med: 25.96 Max: 128.04
Current: 128.04
14.7
128.04

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.59
YUM's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
53% of the 341 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. YUM: 1.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
YUM' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.39  Med: 2.57 Max: 4.1
Current: 1.59
1.39
4.1
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.30
YUM's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
73% of the 211 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 0.34 vs. YUM: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
YUM' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.81
Current: 0.3
0.3
0.81
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -7.60
YUM's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
78% of the 132 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. YUM: -7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
YUM' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 11.8 Max: 73.8
Current: -7.6
0
73.8
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.73
YUM's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
56% of the 331 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. YUM: 1.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.85
YUM's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
50% of the 398 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.79 vs. YUM: 1.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
YUM' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.63  Med: 3.01 Max: 4.8
Current: 1.85
1.63
4.8
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 8.50
YUM's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
97% of the 203 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: -0.80 vs. YUM: 8.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
YUM' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 1.9 Max: 8.5
Current: 8.5
0.2
8.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 2.88
YUM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
95% of the 266 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. YUM: 2.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
YUM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.71 Max: 8.16
Current: 2.88
0.25
8.16
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 4.78
YUM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
81% of the 331 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 4.25 vs. YUM: 4.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
YUM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.1  Med: 8.3 Max: 12.9
Current: 4.78
3.1
12.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -2.36
YUM's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
61% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Restaurants industry.

( Industry Median: 5.61 vs. YUM: -2.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
YUM' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.7  Med: 13.4 Max: 19
Current: -2.36
-6.7
19

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $5,832.00
EPS (TTM) $ 4.28
Beta0.49
Volatility17.31%
52-Week Range $70.80 - 88.07
Shares Outstanding (Mil)323.22

Analyst Estimate

Dec18 Dec19 Dec20
Revenue (Mil $) 5,128 5,060 6,038
EBIT (Mil $) 1,836 1,975 2,096
EBITDA (Mil $) 2,031 2,138 2,286
EPS ($) 3.37 3.88 4.30
EPS without NRI ($) 3.37 3.88 4.30
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
13.38%
Dividends per Share ($) 1.51 1.74 2.20

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 77
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAN
Lower Leverage yoyN
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}