A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Australian Strategic Materials's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
ASMMF'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.75 Med: -0.68 Max: -0.2
Current: -0.2
During the past 5 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Australian Strategic Materials was -0.20. The lowest was -0.75. And the median was -0.68.
ASMMF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 100% of 591
companies
in the Metals & Mining industry
Industry Median: 1.23
vs ASMMF: -0.20
Australian Strategic Materials (OTCPK:ASMMF) Debt-to-EBITDA Explanation
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Australian Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Australian Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Australian Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA Chart
Australian Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA Competitor Comparison
For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, Australian Strategic Materials's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Australian Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA vs Metals & Mining Industry
For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Australian Strategic Materials's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Australian Strategic Materials's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is two times the quarterly (Dec. 2025) EBITDA data.
Australian Strategic Materials (ASMMF) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.23 as of Dec. 2025. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Australian Strategic Materials. According to the industry distribution chart, Australian Strategic Materials ranks #999999 out of 591 companies in the Metals & Mining industry.
Is Australian Strategic Materials' Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Australian Strategic Materials' current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.23. Based on the distribution chart, Australian Strategic Materials ranks #999999 out of 591 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Australian Strategic Materials has a GF Score™ of 28/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Australian Strategic Materials' Debt-to-EBITDA compare to competitors?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Australian Strategic Materials ranks #999999 out of 591 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Australian Strategic Materials in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.23. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Metals & Mining companies is 1.23, based on 591 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Australian Strategic Materials. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.23 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Australian Strategic Materials's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.23. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Australian Strategic Materials stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Australian Strategic Materials (ASMMF) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $0.99, compared to a current price of $0.80 — trading 19.2% below its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.23. Australian Strategic Materials' overall GF Score™ is 28/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Australian Strategic Materials (ASMMF), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.23 as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Australian Strategic Materials (ASMMF) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Australian Strategic Materials stock appears to be undervalued.
The current stock price of $0.80 is trading 19.2% below its estimated GF Value™ of $0.99.
GuruFocus considers Australian Strategic Materials to be Modestly Undervalued.
Key valuation signals for ASMMF:
Debt-to-EBITDA: -0.23
GF Value™: $0.99 vs. price of $0.80 (19.2% below fair value)
No single metric tells the full story. See the ASMMF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Australian Strategic Materials Business Description
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd is engaged in the business of producing and mining specialty metal and oxides. The product portfolio includes neodymium, praseodymium, zirconium, hafnium, dysprosium, terbium and niobium oxides. Its Dubbo Project includes Central Western New South Wales, Australia. The company's segment includes Corporate, Dubbo, and Korea. The company generates majority of its revenue from Korea, which includes the Korean Metals Plant.
28GF Score
Get the complete analysis for ASMMF
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
ASMMF has been successfully added to your 
