Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Chalice MiningCGMLF 31 Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.06 as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus rates CGMLF with a GF Score™ of 31/100. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 597 Metals & Mining companies, Chalice Mining ranks worse than 167504.02% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Chalice Mining's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
CGMLF'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.09 Med: -0.03 Max: -0.01
Current: -0.07
During the past 13 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Chalice Mining was -0.01. The lowest was -0.09. And the median was -0.03.
CGMLF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 100% of 597
companies
in the Metals & Mining industry
Industry Median: 1.2
vs CGMLF: -0.07
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Chalice Mining Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Chalice Mining Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Chalice Mining's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, Chalice Mining's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Chalice Mining Debt-to-EBITDA vs Metals & Mining Industry
For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Chalice Mining's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Chalice Mining's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is two times the quarterly (Dec. 2025) EBITDA data.
Chalice Mining (CGMLF) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.06 as of Dec. 2025. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Chalice Mining. According to the industry distribution chart, Chalice Mining ranks #999999 out of 597 companies in the Metals & Mining industry.
Is Chalice Mining's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Chalice Mining's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.06. Based on the distribution chart, Chalice Mining ranks #999999 out of 597 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Chalice Mining has a GF Score™ of 31/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Chalice Mining's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to competitors?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Chalice Mining ranks #999999 out of 597 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Chalice Mining in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.20. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Metals & Mining companies is 1.20, based on 597 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Chalice Mining. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.20 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Chalice Mining's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.06. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Chalice Mining stock overvalued right now?
Chalice Mining (CGMLF) has a current Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.06. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.06. Chalice Mining's overall GF Score™ is 31/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Chalice Mining (CGMLF), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.06 as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Chalice Mining Ltd is engaged in the exploration of precious and base metal properties. The project portfolio includes Julimar Nickel-Copper-PGE Project, Pyramid Hill Gold Project, Hawkstone Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Project, South West Nickel-Copper-PGE Project, Barrabarra Nickel-Copper-PGE Project, Auralia Nickel-Copper-Gold Project, Warrego North Project, Mt Jackson Gold Project, Nulla South & Gibb Rock Gold Project, and Viking Gold Project. It operates in one reportable segment being mineral exploration and evaluation.
31GF Score
Get the complete analysis for CGMLF
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
CGMLF has been successfully added to your 
