Collective MetalsCLLMF -0.01% Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.01 as of Mar. 2026. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 591 Metals & Mining companies, Collective Metals ranks worse than 169204.57% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Collective Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
CLLMF'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.01 Med: 0 Max: 0
Current: -0.01
CLLMF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 100% of 591
companies
in the Metals & Mining industry
Industry Median: 1.23
vs CLLMF: -0.01
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Collective Metals Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Collective Metals Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Collective Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
For the Other Precious Metals & Mining subindustry, Collective Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Collective Metals Debt-to-EBITDA vs Metals & Mining Industry
For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Collective Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Collective Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Mar. 2026) EBITDA data.
Collective Metals (CLLMF) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.01 as of Mar. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Collective Metals. According to the industry distribution chart, Collective Metals ranks #999999 out of 591 companies in the Metals & Mining industry.
Is Collective Metals' Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Collective Metals' current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.01. Based on the distribution chart, Collective Metals ranks #999999 out of 591 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers.
How does Collective Metals' Debt-to-EBITDA compare to HL?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Collective Metals ranks #999999 out of 591 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Collective Metals in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.23. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Metals & Mining companies is 1.23, based on 591 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Collective Metals. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.23 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Collective Metals's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.01. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Collective Metals stock overvalued right now?
Collective Metals (CLLMF) has a current Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.01. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.01. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Collective Metals (CLLMF), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.01 as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Collective Metals Inc is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of exploration and evaluation assets in Canada. It specializes in precious metals exploration in the Northwest Territories. Its projects include Princeton Project, Landings Lake, Whitemud Lake, and Rocas Project. The company operates in one reportable segment in one geographic region.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
CLLMF has been successfully added to your 