Ferro-Alloy Resources (FRA:5PE) Debt-to-EBITDA : -2.28 (As of Dec. 2025)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is Ferro-Alloy Resources Debt-to-EBITDA?

Ferro-Alloy Resources FRA:5PE +1.33% Debt-to-EBITDA is -2.28 as of Dec. 2025. The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 599 Metals & Mining companies, Ferro-Alloy Resources ranks worse than 166944.74% on this metric.

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

Ferro-Alloy Resources's Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was €10.73 Mil. Ferro-Alloy Resources's Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was €4.34 Mil. Ferro-Alloy Resources's annualized EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was €-6.62 Mil. Ferro-Alloy Resources's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was -2.28.

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.

The historical rank and industry rank for Ferro-Alloy Resources's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:

FRA:5PE' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.97   Med: -0.61   Max: -0.27
Current: -2.97

During the past 12 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Ferro-Alloy Resources was -0.27. The lowest was -2.97. And the median was -0.61.

FRA:5PE's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than
100% of 599 companies
in the Metals & Mining industry
Industry Median: 1.16 vs FRA:5PE: -2.97

Ferro-Alloy Resources  (FRA:5PE) Debt-to-EBITDA Explanation

In the calculation of Debt-to-EBITDA, we use the total of Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation and Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation divided by EBITDA. In some calculations, Total Liabilities is used to for calculation.


Be Aware

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.

According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.


Ferro-Alloy Resources Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms


Ferro-Alloy Resources Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Ferro-Alloy Resources's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Ferro-Alloy Resources Debt-to-EBITDA Chart

Ferro-Alloy Resources Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Debt-to-EBITDA
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -0.61 -0.30 -1.64 -2.51 -2.95

Ferro-Alloy Resources Semi-Annual Data
Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Debt-to-EBITDA Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -1.15 -2.08 -2.23 -4.08 -2.28

Ferro-Alloy Resources Debt-to-EBITDA Competitor Comparison

For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, Ferro-Alloy Resources's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Ferro-Alloy Resources Debt-to-EBITDA vs Metals & Mining Industry

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Ferro-Alloy Resources's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Ferro-Alloy Resources's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.



Ferro-Alloy Resources Debt-to-EBITDA Calculation

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

Ferro-Alloy Resources's Debt-to-EBITDA for the fiscal year that ended in Dec. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(10.729 + 4.343) / -5.103
=-2.95

Ferro-Alloy Resources's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(10.729 + 4.343) / -6.618
=-2.28

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data, the EBITDA data used here is two times the quarterly (Dec. 2025) EBITDA data.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Debt-to-EBITDA →
What does a Debt-to-EBITDA of -2.28 mean?
Ferro-Alloy Resources (FRA:5PE) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of -2.28 as of Dec. 2025. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Ferro-Alloy Resources. According to the industry distribution chart, Ferro-Alloy Resources ranks #999999 out of 599 companies in the Metals & Mining industry.
Is Ferro-Alloy Resources' Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Ferro-Alloy Resources' current Debt-to-EBITDA is -2.28. Based on the distribution chart, Ferro-Alloy Resources ranks #999999 out of 599 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers.
How does Ferro-Alloy Resources' Debt-to-EBITDA compare to competitors?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Ferro-Alloy Resources ranks #999999 out of 599 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Ferro-Alloy Resources in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.16. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Metals & Mining companies is 1.16, based on 599 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Ferro-Alloy Resources. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.16 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Ferro-Alloy Resources's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -2.28. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Ferro-Alloy Resources stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Ferro-Alloy Resources (FRA:5PE) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is €0.04, compared to a current price of €0.04 — trading 5% below its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is -2.28. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Ferro-Alloy Resources (FRA:5PE), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is -2.28 as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Ferro-Alloy Resources Business Description

Other Exchanges FAR:UK
Address Maison Allaire, Smith Street, Saint Peter Port, GGY, GY1 2NG
Ferro-Alloy Resources Ltd is engaged in developing and exploiting the Balasausqandiq vanadium deposit in Kyzylordinskaya oblast of Southern Kazakhstan. The company has also converted the original pilot test-plant and developed to prove the metallurgical processes to use at the mine processing facility. The company segments are based on their nature of operations: processing, subsoil operations (being operations related to exploration and mining), and the corporate segment. It generates maximum revenue from the processing segment. The company derives its revenue from Kazakhstan.