Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Great Elm GroupFRA:PNC +1.11%14 Debt-to-EBITDA is 8.30 as of Jun. 2026, which is 182% above its 10-year median of 2.94. GuruFocus rates FRA:PNC with a GF Score™ of 14/100 and a GF Value™ of €2.61 (Possible Value Trap). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 381 Asset Management companies, Great Elm Group ranks worse than 262466.93% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Great Elm Group's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
FRA:PNC'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.6 Med: 2.94 Max: 27.8
Current: -2.02
During the past 13 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Great Elm Group was 27.80. The lowest was -6.60. And the median was 2.94.
FRA:PNC's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 100% of 381
companies
in the Asset Management industry
Industry Median: 1.4
vs FRA:PNC: -2.02
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Great Elm Group Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Great Elm Group Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Great Elm Group's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
FRA:PNC vs PCM, PGZ, NMS: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison
For the Asset Management subindustry, Great Elm Group's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Great Elm Group Debt-to-EBITDA vs Asset Management Industry
For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, Great Elm Group's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Great Elm Group's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Jun. 2026) EBITDA data.
Great Elm Group (FRA:PNC) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of 8.30 as of Jun. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Great Elm Group. This is 182% above median its historical median of 2.94. According to the industry distribution chart, Great Elm Group ranks #999999 out of 381 companies in the Asset Management industry.
Is Great Elm Group's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Great Elm Group's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 8.30 is 182% above median its 10-year median of 2.94. The Asset Management industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.40. Great Elm Group's value of 8.30 is 492.9% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Great Elm Group ranks #999999 out of 381 companies in the Asset Management industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Great Elm Group has a GF Score™ of 14/100 and is considered Possible Value Trap, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Great Elm Group's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to PCM and PGZ?
According to the Asset Management industry distribution chart, Great Elm Group ranks #999999 out of 381 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Great Elm Group in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.40. Great Elm Group's value of 8.30 is 492.9% above this benchmark. While the company's 10-year median is 2.94 vs. the industry median of 1.40, Great Elm Group has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for an Asset Management company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Asset Management companies is 1.40, based on 381 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Great Elm Group's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 8.30 is 492.9% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Great Elm Group. For the Asset Management industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.40 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Great Elm Group's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 8.30, which is 182% above median its own 10-year median of 2.94. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Great Elm Group stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Great Elm Group (FRA:PNC) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is €2.61, compared to a current price of €1.82 — trading 30.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is 8.30, which is 182% above median its 10-year median of 2.94 and 492.9% above the Asset Management industry median of 1.40. Great Elm Group's overall GF Score™ is 14/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Great Elm Group (FRA:PNC), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is 8.30 as of Jun. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Great Elm Group (FRA:PNC) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Great Elm Group stock appears to be undervalued.
The current stock price of €1.82 is trading 30.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of €2.61.
GuruFocus considers Great Elm Group to be Possible Value Trap.
Key valuation signals for FRA:PNC:
Debt-to-EBITDA: 8.30 (182% above median its 10-year median of 2.94)
GF Value™: €2.61 vs. price of €1.82 (30.3% below fair value)
Industry Position: 492.9% above the Asset Management median (#999999 of 381)
No single metric tells the full story. See the FRA:PNC stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Great Elm Group Inc operates as an alternative asset manager focused on growing a scalable and diversified portfolio of long-duration and permanent capital vehicles across credit, real estate, specialty finance, and other alternative strategies. Along with its subsidiaries, it manages Great Elm Capital Corp, a publicly traded business development company, and Monomoy Properties REIT, LLC, an industrial-focused real estate investment trust, in addition to other investments.
14GF Score
Get the complete analysis for FRA:PNC
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
FRA:PNC has been successfully added to your 
