Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Kun Peng InternationalKPEA 29 Debt-to-EBITDA is -1.69 as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus rates KPEA with a GF Score™ of 29/100 and a GF Value™ of $0.25 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 911 Retail - Cyclical companies, Kun Peng International ranks worse than 109769.37% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Kun Peng International's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
KPEA'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.69 Med: -0.37 Max: -0.19
Current: -3.33
During the past 6 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Kun Peng International was -0.19. The lowest was -3.69. And the median was -0.37.
KPEA's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 100% of 911
companies
in the Retail - Cyclical industry
Industry Median: 2.29
vs KPEA: -3.33
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Kun Peng International Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Kun Peng International Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Kun Peng International's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
KPEA vs NHTC, MOGU, UZX: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison
For the Internet Retail subindustry, Kun Peng International's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Kun Peng International Debt-to-EBITDA vs Retail - Cyclical Industry
For the Retail - Cyclical industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Kun Peng International's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Kun Peng International's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Mar. 2026) EBITDA data.
Kun Peng International (KPEA) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of -1.69 as of Mar. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Kun Peng International. According to the industry distribution chart, Kun Peng International ranks #999999 out of 911 companies in the Retail - Cyclical industry.
Is Kun Peng International's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Kun Peng International's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -1.69. Based on the distribution chart, Kun Peng International ranks #999999 out of 911 companies in the Retail - Cyclical industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Kun Peng International has a GF Score™ of 29/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Kun Peng International's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to NHTC and MOGU?
According to the Retail - Cyclical industry distribution chart, Kun Peng International ranks #999999 out of 911 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Kun Peng International in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 2.29. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Retail - Cyclical company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Retail - Cyclical companies is 2.29, based on 911 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Kun Peng International. For the Retail - Cyclical industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 2.29 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Kun Peng International's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -1.69. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Kun Peng International stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Kun Peng International (KPEA) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $0.25, compared to a current price of $0.32 — trading 28% above its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is -1.69. Kun Peng International's overall GF Score™ is 29/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Kun Peng International (KPEA), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is -1.69 as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Kun Peng International (KPEA) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Kun Peng International stock appears to be overvalued.
The current stock price of $0.32 is trading 28% above its estimated GF Value™ of $0.25.
GuruFocus considers Kun Peng International to be Modestly Overvalued.
Key valuation signals for KPEA:
Debt-to-EBITDA: -1.69
GF Value™: $0.25 vs. price of $0.32 (28% above fair value)
No single metric tells the full story. See the KPEA stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Kun Peng International Ltd through its subsidiaries and VIE is currently engaged in the sale of healthcare and health-related household products through its online platform, King Eagle Mall and physical store (Smart kiosks) as the carrier to provide people with more professional and comprehensive health services. Its products include health care products such as dietary supplements, nutritional health foods, beauty cosmeceuticals, and other categories (for instance, milk powder, and dried fruits) of health foods for supporting the cardiovascular system, and bone joint health. It offers collagen peptides, probiotics, and health foods for improving blood circulation and vein health, as well as household products that can promote and improve a healthier lifestyle.
29GF Score
Get the complete analysis for KPEA
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
KPEA has been successfully added to your 
