Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Radiant UraniumKSMCF 13 Debt-to-EBITDA is -2.61 as of Oct. 2025. GuruFocus rates KSMCF with a GF Score™ of 13/100. Among 92 Other Energy Sources companies, Radiant Uranium ranks worse than 1086955.43% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Radiant Uranium's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
KSMCF'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0 Med: 0 Max: 0
Current: -5.49
KSMCF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 100% of 92
companies
in the Other Energy Sources industry
Industry Median: 2.185
vs KSMCF: -5.49
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Radiant Uranium Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Radiant Uranium Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Radiant Uranium's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
For the Uranium subindustry, Radiant Uranium's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Radiant Uranium Debt-to-EBITDA vs Other Energy Sources Industry
For the Other Energy Sources industry and Energy sector, Radiant Uranium's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Radiant Uranium's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Oct. 2025) EBITDA data.
Radiant Uranium (KSMCF) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of -2.61 as of Oct. 2025. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Radiant Uranium. According to the industry distribution chart, Radiant Uranium ranks #999999 out of 92 companies in the Other Energy Sources industry.
Is Radiant Uranium's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Radiant Uranium's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -2.61. Based on the distribution chart, Radiant Uranium ranks #999999 out of 92 companies in the Other Energy Sources industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Radiant Uranium has a GF Score™ of 13/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Radiant Uranium's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to ?
According to the Other Energy Sources industry distribution chart, Radiant Uranium ranks #999999 out of 92 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Radiant Uranium in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 2.19. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for an Other Energy Sources company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Other Energy Sources companies is 2.19, based on 92 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Radiant Uranium. For the Other Energy Sources industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 2.19 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Radiant Uranium's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -2.61. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Radiant Uranium stock overvalued right now?
Radiant Uranium (KSMCF) has a current Debt-to-EBITDA of -2.61. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is -2.61. Radiant Uranium's overall GF Score™ is 13/100. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Radiant Uranium (KSMCF), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is -2.61 as of Oct. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Kirkstone Metals Corp is in the business of identifying, acquiring and exploring mineral properties. The Company is currently in the exploration stage of developing its exploration and evaluation properties and has not yet determined whether it contain mineral reserves that are economically recoverable.
13GF Score
Get the complete analysis for KSMCF
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
KSMCF has been successfully added to your 
