Met.Extra Group (MIL:MET) Debt-to-EBITDA : (As of Dec. 2025)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

MIL:MET Met.Extra Group MIL:MET
71 GF Score
Price €2.40
GF Value €3.05
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 4 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Met.Extra Group Debt-to-EBITDA?

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

Met.Extra Group's Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was €2.30 Mil. Met.Extra Group's Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was €7.08 Mil. Met.Extra Group's annualized EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was €5.69 Mil. Met.Extra Group's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was 1.65.

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.

The historical rank and industry rank for Met.Extra Group's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:

MIL:MET' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.42   Med: 1.09   Max: 3.37
Current: 1.33

During the past 13 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Met.Extra Group was 3.37. The lowest was -0.42. And the median was 1.09.

MIL:MET's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than
50.13% of 377 companies
in the Asset Management industry
Industry Median: 1.33 vs MIL:MET: 1.33

Met.Extra Group  (MIL:MET) Debt-to-EBITDA Explanation

In the calculation of Debt-to-EBITDA, we use the total of Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation and Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation divided by EBITDA. In some calculations, Total Liabilities is used to for calculation.

Be Aware

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.

According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.

Met.Extra Group Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms

Met.Extra Group Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Met.Extra Group's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Met.Extra Group Debt-to-EBITDA Chart

Met.Extra Group Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Debt-to-EBITDA
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only - - - - -

Met.Extra Group Semi-Annual Data
Dec12 Jun13 Jun14 Jun16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Debt-to-EBITDA Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only - - - - -

MIL:MET vs BLK, BX, KKR: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison

For the Asset Management subindustry, Met.Extra Group's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.

Met.Extra Group Debt-to-EBITDA vs Asset Management Industry

For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, Met.Extra Group's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Met.Extra Group's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.


MIL:MET
71GF Score
Met.Extra Group MIL:MET
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

Met.Extra Group Debt-to-EBITDA Calculation

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

Met.Extra Group's Debt-to-EBITDA for the fiscal year that ended in Dec. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(2.301 + 7.077) / 7.241
=1.30

Met.Extra Group's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(2.301 + 7.077) / 5.69
=1.65

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data, the EBITDA data used here is two times the quarterly (Dec. 2025) EBITDA data.

Is Met.Extra Group (MIL:MET) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Met.Extra Group stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of €2.40 is trading 21.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of €3.05. GuruFocus considers Met.Extra Group to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for MIL:MET:

  • Debt-to-EBITDA:
  • GF Value™: €3.05 vs. price of €2.40 (21.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 71/100 with 4 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the MIL:MET stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.

Met.Extra Group Business Description

Address Corso Monforte 7, Milano, ITA, 20122
Met.Extra Group, formerly TitanMet SpA is an Italian investment company. Its objective is to carry out a wide-ranging strategic project aimed at future investments in assets or financial instruments that do not involve the acquisition of control in the realities of interest. It is also involved in the development of synergies and implementation of subsequent integrations, acquisitions, spin-offs, and other interventions, as well as provides advisory services.
71GF Score

Get the complete analysis for MIL:MET

Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

€2.40
Price
€3.05
GF Value