Nano DimensionNNDM 57 Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.12 as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus rates NNDM with a GF Score™ of 57/100 and a GF Value™ of $5.43 (Possible Value Trap). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,795 Hardware companies, Nano Dimension ranks worse than 55710.25% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Nano Dimension's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
NNDM'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.6 Med: -0.08 Max: -0.03
Current: -0.24
During the past 13 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Nano Dimension was -0.03. The lowest was -0.60. And the median was -0.08.
NNDM's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 100% of 1795
companies
in the Hardware industry
Industry Median: 1.73
vs NNDM: -0.24
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Nano Dimension Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Nano Dimension Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Nano Dimension's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
NNDM vs CAN, ALOT, BGIN: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison
For the Computer Hardware subindustry, Nano Dimension's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Nano Dimension Debt-to-EBITDA vs Hardware Industry
For the Hardware industry and Technology sector, Nano Dimension's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Nano Dimension's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Mar. 2026) EBITDA data.
Nano Dimension (NNDM) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.12 as of Mar. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Nano Dimension. According to the industry distribution chart, Nano Dimension ranks #999999 out of 1795 companies in the Hardware industry.
Is Nano Dimension's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Nano Dimension's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.12. Based on the distribution chart, Nano Dimension ranks #999999 out of 1795 companies in the Hardware industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Nano Dimension has a GF Score™ of 57/100 and is considered Possible Value Trap, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Nano Dimension's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to CAN and ALOT?
According to the Hardware industry distribution chart, Nano Dimension ranks #999999 out of 1795 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Nano Dimension in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.73. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Hardware company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Hardware companies is 1.73, based on 1,795 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Nano Dimension. For the Hardware industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.73 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Nano Dimension's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.12. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Nano Dimension stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Nano Dimension (NNDM) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is $5.43, compared to a current price of $1.50 — trading 72.5% below its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.12. Nano Dimension's overall GF Score™ is 57/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Nano Dimension (NNDM), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.12 as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Nano Dimension (NNDM) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Nano Dimension stock appears to be undervalued.
The current stock price of $1.50 is trading 72.5% below its estimated GF Value™ of $5.43.
GuruFocus considers Nano Dimension to be Possible Value Trap.
Key valuation signals for NNDM:
Debt-to-EBITDA: -0.12
GF Value™: $5.43 vs. price of $1.50 (72.5% below fair value)
No single metric tells the full story. See the NNDM stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Nano Dimension Ltd provides industrial manufacturing solutions for the design-to-manufacturing of electronics and mechanical parts. These solutions are based on a combination of hardware, software, and materials science technologies. The solutions include industrial machinery, such as those for additive manufacturing, surface-mount technology, and industrial inkjet printing, along with software for design, simulation, and manufacturing management, as well as materials or consumables that are used by the machinery. These solutions are used by industrial customers in aerospace & defense, automotive, electronics, medical, research, and academia, along with government organizations.
57GF Score
Get the complete analysis for NNDM
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
NNDM has been successfully added to your 
