Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Grindwell Norton's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
NSE:GRINDWELL'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03 Med: 0.08 Max: 0.14
Current: 0.09
During the past 13 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Grindwell Norton was 0.14. The lowest was 0.03. And the median was 0.08.
NSE:GRINDWELL's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked better than 93.75% of 1408
companies
in the Construction industry
Industry Median: 2.1
vs NSE:GRINDWELL: 0.09
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Grindwell Norton Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Grindwell Norton Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Grindwell Norton's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
NSE:GRINDWELL vs TT, JCI, CARR: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison
For the Building Products & Equipment subindustry, Grindwell Norton's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Grindwell Norton Debt-to-EBITDA vs Construction Industry
For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, Grindwell Norton's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Grindwell Norton's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Jun. 2026) EBITDA data.
Grindwell Norton (NSE:GRINDWELL) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of 0.00 as of Jun. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Grindwell Norton. Over the past decade, Grindwell Norton's Debt-to-EBITDA has ranged from 0.03 to 0.14. According to the industry distribution chart, Grindwell Norton ranks #88 out of 1408 companies in the Construction industry, placing it in the top 6.2%.
Is Grindwell Norton's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Grindwell Norton's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 0.03 to a high of 0.14. Based on the distribution chart, Grindwell Norton ranks #88 out of 1408 companies in the Construction industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Grindwell Norton has a GF Score™ of 97/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Grindwell Norton's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to TT and JCI?
According to the Construction industry distribution chart, Grindwell Norton ranks #88 out of 1408 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Grindwell Norton in the top 6% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 2.10. Historically, Grindwell Norton's own Debt-to-EBITDA has ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 over the past decade. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Construction company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Construction companies is 2.10, based on 1,408 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Grindwell Norton. For the Construction industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 2.10 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Grindwell Norton's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Grindwell Norton stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Grindwell Norton (NSE:GRINDWELL) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is ₹2,225.27, compared to a current price of ₹1,885.80 — trading 15.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.00. Grindwell Norton's overall GF Score™ is 97/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Grindwell Norton (NSE:GRINDWELL), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.00 as of Jun. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Grindwell Norton (NSE:GRINDWELL) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Grindwell Norton stock appears to be undervalued.
The current stock price of ₹1,885.80 is trading 15.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of ₹2,225.27.
GuruFocus considers Grindwell Norton to be Modestly Undervalued.
Key valuation signals for NSE:GRINDWELL:
Debt-to-EBITDA: 0.00
GF Value™: ₹2,225.27 vs. price of ₹1,885.80 (15.3% below fair value)
No single metric tells the full story. See the NSE:GRINDWELL stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Grindwell Norton Ltd is a company that produces abrasives and ceramics products. The company's businesses are divided into segments: Abrasives, Ceramics and Plastics, Digital Services and Others. The company manufactures various types of abrasives, which include bonded, coated, non-woven, construction, thin wheels, and super abrasives. Grindwell's Ceramics and Plastics division produces silicon carbide, high-temperature refractories, and fused cast ceramics. The silicon carbide products serve as raw materials that are used to create abrasives, and the company's refractories are structures used for processing both ferrous and non-ferrous metals. The company generates the vast majority of its revenue from Ceramics and Plastics division.
97GF Score
Get the complete analysis for NSE:GRINDWELL
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
NSE:GRINDWELL has been successfully added to your 
