Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Royalty Management Holding's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
RMCO'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.33 Med: -1.25 Max: 7.25
Current: -0.61
During the past 5 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Royalty Management Holding was 7.25. The lowest was -7.33. And the median was -1.25.
RMCO's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 100% of 387
companies
in the Asset Management industry
Industry Median: 1.39
vs RMCO: -0.61
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Royalty Management Holding Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Royalty Management Holding Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
RMCO vs MLCI, CXH, BXLC: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison
For the Asset Management subindustry, Royalty Management Holding's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Royalty Management Holding Debt-to-EBITDA vs Asset Management Industry
For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, Royalty Management Holding's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Royalty Management Holding's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Jun. 2026) EBITDA data.
Royalty Management Holding (RMCO) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of 0.30 as of Jun. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Royalty Management Holding. According to the industry distribution chart, Royalty Management Holding ranks #999999 out of 387 companies in the Asset Management industry.
Is Royalty Management Holding's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Royalty Management Holding's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.30. The Asset Management industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.39. Royalty Management Holding's value of 0.30 is 78.4% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Royalty Management Holding ranks #999999 out of 387 companies in the Asset Management industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Royalty Management Holding has a GF Score™ of 27/100 and is considered Possible Value Trap, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Royalty Management Holding's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to MLCI and CXH?
According to the Asset Management industry distribution chart, Royalty Management Holding ranks #999999 out of 387 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Royalty Management Holding in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.39. Royalty Management Holding's value of 0.30 is 78.4% below this benchmark. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for an Asset Management company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Asset Management companies is 1.39, based on 387 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Royalty Management Holding's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 0.30 is 78.4% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Royalty Management Holding. For the Asset Management industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.39 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Royalty Management Holding's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.30. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Royalty Management Holding stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Royalty Management Holding (RMCO) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is $7.90, compared to a current price of $3.02 — trading 61.8% below its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.30 and 78.4% below the Asset Management industry median of 1.39. Royalty Management Holding's overall GF Score™ is 27/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Royalty Management Holding (RMCO), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.30 as of Jun. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Royalty Management Holding (RMCO) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Royalty Management Holding stock appears to be undervalued.
The current stock price of $3.02 is trading 61.8% below its estimated GF Value™ of $7.90.
GuruFocus considers Royalty Management Holding to be Possible Value Trap.
Key valuation signals for RMCO:
Debt-to-EBITDA: 0.30
GF Value™: $7.90 vs. price of $3.02 (61.8% below fair value)
Industry Position: 78.4% below the Asset Management median (#999999 of 387)
No single metric tells the full story. See the RMCO stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Royalty Management Holding Corp is formed to invest or purchase assets that have near and medium-term income potential to provide RMC with accretive cash flow from which it can reinvest in new assets or expand cash flow from those existing assets. These assets typically are natural resources assets (including real estate and mining permits), patents, intellectual property, and emerging technologies.
27GF Score
Get the complete analysis for RMCO
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
RMCO has been successfully added to your 
