Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Richmond MineralsRMDFF +403.64%31 Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.74 as of Feb. 2026. GuruFocus rates RMDFF with a GF Score™ of 31/100. Among 595 Metals & Mining companies, Richmond Minerals ranks worse than 51.76% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Richmond Minerals's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
RMDFF'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.62 Med: -0.5 Max: 1.29
Current: 1.29
During the past 13 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Richmond Minerals was 1.29. The lowest was -0.62. And the median was -0.50.
RMDFF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 51.76% of 595
companies
in the Metals & Mining industry
Industry Median: 1.2
vs RMDFF: 1.29
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Richmond Minerals Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Richmond Minerals Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Richmond Minerals's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
For the Other Precious Metals & Mining subindustry, Richmond Minerals's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Richmond Minerals Debt-to-EBITDA vs Metals & Mining Industry
For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Richmond Minerals's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Richmond Minerals's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Feb. 2026) EBITDA data.
Richmond Minerals (RMDFF) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of 0.74 as of Feb. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Richmond Minerals. According to the industry distribution chart, Richmond Minerals ranks #308 out of 595 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, placing it in the top 51.8%.
Is Richmond Minerals' Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Richmond Minerals' current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.74. The Metals & Mining industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.20. Richmond Minerals' value of 0.74 is 38.3% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Richmond Minerals ranks #308 out of 595 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Richmond Minerals has a GF Score™ of 31/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Richmond Minerals' Debt-to-EBITDA compare to HL?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Richmond Minerals ranks #308 out of 595 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Richmond Minerals in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.20. Richmond Minerals' value of 0.74 is 38.3% below this benchmark. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Metals & Mining companies is 1.20, based on 595 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Richmond Minerals's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 0.74 is 38.3% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Richmond Minerals. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.20 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Richmond Minerals's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.74. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Richmond Minerals stock overvalued right now?
Richmond Minerals (RMDFF) has a current Debt-to-EBITDA of 0.74. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.74 and 38.3% below the Metals & Mining industry median of 1.20. Richmond Minerals' overall GF Score™ is 31/100. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Richmond Minerals (RMDFF), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.74 as of Feb. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Richmond Minerals Inc is engaged in base and precious metal mining and related activities, including exploration and development in Northern Ontario. The company is in the process of exploring its mineral properties and has not yet determined whether these properties contain ore reserves that are economically recoverable. Its property consists of the Ridley Lake Gold Project. It operates in one industry segment, Junior exploration and evaluation, and geographically in one country, Canada.
31GF Score
Get the complete analysis for RMDFF
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
RMDFF has been successfully added to your 
