New Age Metals (TSXV:NAM) Debt-to-EBITDA : 0.13 (As of Jan. 2026)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

TSXV:NAM New Age Metals Inc TSXV:NAM
36 GF Score
Price C$0.25
! 1 Warning Sign
View Full Analysis

What is New Age Metals Debt-to-EBITDA?

New Age Metals TSXV:NAM -1.96% 36 Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.13 as of Jan. 2026. GuruFocus rates TSXV:NAM with a GF Score™ of 36/100. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 599 Metals & Mining companies, New Age Metals ranks better than 80.3% on this metric.

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

New Age Metals's Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Jan. 2026 was C$0.04 Mil. New Age Metals's Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Jan. 2026 was C$0.01 Mil. New Age Metals's annualized EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Jan. 2026 was C$0.40 Mil. New Age Metals's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Jan. 2026 was 0.13.

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.

The historical rank and industry rank for New Age Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:

TSXV:NAM' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.25   Med: -0.18   Max: 0.15
Current: 0.15

During the past 13 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of New Age Metals was 0.15. The lowest was -0.25. And the median was -0.18.

TSXV:NAM's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked better than
80.3% of 599 companies
in the Metals & Mining industry
Industry Median: 1.16 vs TSXV:NAM: 0.15

New Age Metals  (TSXV:NAM) Debt-to-EBITDA Explanation

In the calculation of Debt-to-EBITDA, we use the total of Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation and Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation divided by EBITDA. In some calculations, Total Liabilities is used to for calculation.


Be Aware

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.

According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.


New Age Metals Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms


New Age Metals Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for New Age Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

New Age Metals Debt-to-EBITDA Chart

New Age Metals Annual Data
Trend Apr16 Apr17 Apr18 Apr19 Apr20 Apr21 Apr22 Apr23 Apr24 Apr25
Debt-to-EBITDA
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -0.02 0.00 -0.25 -0.19 -0.18

New Age Metals Quarterly Data
Apr21 Jul21 Oct21 Jan22 Apr22 Jul22 Oct22 Jan23 Apr23 Jul23 Oct23 Jan24 Apr24 Jul24 Oct24 Jan25 Apr25 Jul25 Oct25 Jan26
Debt-to-EBITDA Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -0.10 0.07 -0.22 0.38 0.13

New Age Metals Debt-to-EBITDA Competitor Comparison

For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, New Age Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


New Age Metals Debt-to-EBITDA vs Metals & Mining Industry

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, New Age Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where New Age Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.


TSXV:NAM
36GF Score
New Age Metals Inc TSXV:NAM
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

New Age Metals Debt-to-EBITDA Calculation

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

New Age Metals's Debt-to-EBITDA for the fiscal year that ended in Apr. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(0.039 + 0.04) / -0.449
=-0.18

New Age Metals's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Jan. 2026 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(0.039 + 0.012) / 0.404
=0.13

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data, the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Jan. 2026) EBITDA data.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Debt-to-EBITDA →
What does a Debt-to-EBITDA of 0.13 mean?
New Age Metals (TSXV:NAM) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of 0.13 as of Jan. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on New Age Metals. According to the industry distribution chart, New Age Metals ranks #118 out of 599 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, placing it in the top 19.7%.
Is New Age Metals' Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
New Age Metals' current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.13. The Metals & Mining industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.16. New Age Metals' value of 0.13 is 88.8% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, New Age Metals ranks #118 out of 599 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, New Age Metals has a GF Score™ of 36/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does New Age Metals' Debt-to-EBITDA compare to competitors?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, New Age Metals ranks #118 out of 599 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places New Age Metals in the top 20% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.16. New Age Metals' value of 0.13 is 88.8% below this benchmark. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Metals & Mining companies is 1.16, based on 599 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. New Age Metals's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 0.13 is 88.8% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on New Age Metals. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.16 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. New Age Metals's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.13. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is New Age Metals stock overvalued right now?
New Age Metals (TSXV:NAM) has a current Debt-to-EBITDA of 0.13. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.13 and 88.8% below the Metals & Mining industry median of 1.16. New Age Metals' overall GF Score™ is 36/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For New Age Metals (TSXV:NAM), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.13 as of Jan. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

New Age Metals Business Description

Other Exchanges NMTLF:USAP7J:Germany
Address 2148 West 38th Avenue, Suite 101, Vancouver, BC, CAN, V6M 1R9
New Age Metals Inc is a mineral exploration company focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of Platinum Group Metals (PGMs), precious metals, base metals, and strategic critical metals, including lithium, antimony, and high-purity iron ore. The company's project portfolio comprises the River Valley Palladium project, located in the Sudbury Region of Ontario; several lithium projects such as Lithium One, Lithium Two, Litham West, Cat Lake Lithium, Litham East, Litham East Extension, and Litham North, located northeast of Winnipeg, Manitoba; the Alaska Genesis project; and the Newfoundland portfolio, which includes eight wholly owned properties in Canada's mineral exploration belts. The company's operations are carried out in Canada and the United States.
36GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TSXV:NAM

Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

C$0.25
Price