Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Wearable Devices's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
WLDS'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.18 Med: -0.11 Max: -0.03
Current: -0.04
During the past 7 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Wearable Devices was -0.03. The lowest was -3.18. And the median was -0.11.
WLDS's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 100% of 1792
companies
in the Hardware industry
Industry Median: 1.71
vs WLDS: -0.04
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Wearable Devices Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Wearable Devices Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Wearable Devices's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
WLDS vs MSN, RIME, FEBO: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison
For the Consumer Electronics subindustry, Wearable Devices's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Wearable Devices Debt-to-EBITDA vs Hardware Industry
For the Hardware industry and Technology sector, Wearable Devices's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Wearable Devices's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is two times the quarterly (Dec. 2025) EBITDA data.
Wearable Devices (WLDS) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.04 as of Dec. 2025. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Wearable Devices. According to the industry distribution chart, Wearable Devices ranks #999999 out of 1792 companies in the Hardware industry.
Is Wearable Devices' Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Wearable Devices' current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.04. Based on the distribution chart, Wearable Devices ranks #999999 out of 1792 companies in the Hardware industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Wearable Devices has a GF Score™ of 47/100 and is considered Possible Value Trap, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Wearable Devices' Debt-to-EBITDA compare to MSN and RIME?
According to the Hardware industry distribution chart, Wearable Devices ranks #999999 out of 1792 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Wearable Devices in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.71. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Hardware company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Hardware companies is 1.71, based on 1,792 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Wearable Devices. For the Hardware industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.71 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Wearable Devices's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.04. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Wearable Devices stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Wearable Devices (WLDS) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is $25.12, compared to a current price of $2.56 — trading 89.8% below its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.04. Wearable Devices' overall GF Score™ is 47/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Wearable Devices (WLDS), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.04 as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Wearable Devices (WLDS) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Wearable Devices stock appears to be undervalued.
The current stock price of $2.56 is trading 89.8% below its estimated GF Value™ of $25.12.
GuruFocus considers Wearable Devices to be Possible Value Trap.
Key valuation signals for WLDS:
Debt-to-EBITDA: -0.04
GF Value™: $25.12 vs. price of $2.56 (89.8% below fair value)
No single metric tells the full story. See the WLDS stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Wearable Devices Ltd develops and sells human-machine interface solutions for the smart wearables industry. These digital devices include consumer electronics, smart watches, smartphones, AR glasses, VR headsets, televisions, PCs, laptop computers, drones, robots, etc. The company has completed the transition phase from research and development to commercialization of technology into B2B and B2C products. Its products include Mudra Inspire, a band for the Apple Watch that allows touchless operation and control of Apple ecosystem devices such as iPhone, Mac computer, Apple TV, and iPad, inter alia.
47GF Score
Get the complete analysis for WLDS
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
WLDS has been successfully added to your 
