MEHA (Functional Brands) EBITDA: $-5.37 Mil (TTM As of Mar. 2026)


What is Functional Brands EBITDA?

Functional Brands MEHA +3.92% EBITDA is $-5.37 Mil as of Mar. 2026. The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review.

Functional Brands's EBITDA for the three months ended in Mar. 2026 was $-6.86 Mil. Its EBITDA for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended in Mar. 2026 was $-5.37 Mil.

Please click Growth Rate Calculation Example (GuruFocus) to see how GuruFocus calculates Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT)'s revenue growth rate. You can apply the same method to get the EBITDA Growth Rate using EBITDA data.

Functional Brands's EBITDA per Share for the three months ended in Mar. 2026 was $-0.35. Its EBITDA per share for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended in Mar. 2026 was $-0.23.

Please click Growth Rate Calculation Example (GuruFocus) to see how GuruFocus calculates Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT)'s revenue growth rate. You can apply the same method to get the EBITDA per share growth rate using EBITDA per Share data.

Functional Brands  (OTCPK:MEHA) EBITDA Explanation

EBITDA is a cash flow measure that ignores changes in working capital. EBITDA minus Depreciation, and Amortization (DA) equals Operating Income. Operating Income is profit before interest and taxes. Of course, Interest and taxes need to be paid.

While depreciation and amortization expenses do not need to be paid in cash, assets - especially tangible assets - do need to be replaced over time. EBITDA is not a measure of profit in any sense. EBITDA is a measure of cash generation by a business where the uses of that cash may be more or less discretionary depending on the nature of the business.

The EBITDA of a TV station is largely discretionary. Owners may use much of the EBITDA generated by a TV station as they see fit. The EBITDA of a railroad is largely non-discretionary. Owners must use much of the EBITDA generated by a railroad to replace the physical assets of the railroad or the business will literally fall apart over time.

EBITDA can be thought of as the cash a business generates that is available to:

Add more inventory
Add more receivables
Replace property, plant, and equipment
Add more property, plant, and equipment
Pay interest
Pay taxes
And finally: pay owners

EBITDA is widely used in financial analysis because Depreciation and Amortization are not present day cash expenses.. Depreciation and amortization are the spreading out of the costs of assets over the time in which those assets provide benefits. Today's depreciation and amortization expenses relate to assets bought in the past. The assets being expensed may or may not need to be replaced in the future. And the cost to replace the assets may be more or less than it was in the past. For this reason, the depreciation and amortization expenses a company records in the present year may have no relationship to the actual cash costs needed to maintain its assets in future years.

A company's depreciation expense depends on both its expectations about the assets it owns and its choice of accounting methods. Two companies owning identical assets may have different depreciation expenses because they have different expectations about the useful lives of those assets and because they make different accounting choices.

Analysts use EBITDA to remove this element of personal choice from a company's accounting statements. The use of EBITDA is an attempt to make the results of different companies more comparable and uniform.


Be Aware

Although depreciation is not a cash cost it is a real business cost because the company has to pay for the fixed assets when they purchase them. Both Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger hate the idea of EBITDA because in this calculation, depreciation is not counted as an expense.

EBITDA over Revenue is a good metric for comparing the operating efficiencies between companies because EBITDA is less vulnerable to companies' accounting choices. For this reason, EBITDA is used in ranking the Predictability of Companies. Also Price-to-EBITDA is sometimes used in valuations.


Functional Brands EBITDA Related Terms


Functional Brands EBITDA Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Functional Brands's EBITDA can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Functional Brands EBITDA Chart

Functional Brands Annual Data
Trend Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
EBITDA
-1.58 -0.25 -0.65 0.17 1.56

Functional Brands Quarterly Data
Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
EBITDA Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.07 -0.06 0.52 1.04 -6.86

MEHA vs TOFB, HIGR, CYAN: EBITDA Comparison

For the Packaged Foods subindustry, Functional Brands's EV-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and EV-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Functional Brands EV-to-EBITDA vs Consumer Packaged Goods Industry

For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry and Consumer Defensive sector, Functional Brands's EV-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Functional Brands's EV-to-EBITDA falls into.


Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) is what the company earns before it expenses interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

Functional Brands's EBITDA for the fiscal year that ended in Dec. 2025 is calculated as

Functional Brands's EBITDA was directly provided by GuruFocus' data source Morningstar. For the fiscal year ended in Dec. 2025, Functional Brands's EBITDA was $1.56 Mil.

Functional Brands's EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Mar. 2026 is calculated as

Functional Brands's EBITDA was directly provided by GuruFocus' data source Morningstar. For the quarter ended in Mar. 2026, Functional Brands's EBITDA was $-6.86 Mil.

EBITDA for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended in Mar. 2026 adds up the quarterly data reported by the company within the most recent 12 months, which was $-5.37 Mil.

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Sometimes companies may have already deducted Depreciation and Amortization from Gross Profit. In this case Depreciation and Amortization needs to be added back when calculating EBITDA.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about EBITDA →
What does a EBITDA of $-5.37 Mil mean?
Functional Brands (MEHA) has a EBITDA of $-5.37 Mil as of Mar. 2026. Ebitda is the difference between operating revenue and operating expenses not including depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Functional Brands.
Is Functional Brands' EBITDA too high?
Functional Brands' current EBITDA is $-5.37 Mil.
How does Functional Brands' EBITDA compare to TOFB and HIGR?
Functional Brands' EBITDA of $-5.37 Mil can be compared against companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good EBITDA for a Consumer Packaged Goods company?
A good EBITDA depends on the Consumer Packaged Goods industry context. However, EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high EBITDA mean?
A high EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Ebitda is the difference between operating revenue and operating expenses not including depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Functional Brands. Functional Brands's current EBITDA is $-5.37 Mil. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Functional Brands stock overvalued right now?
Functional Brands (MEHA) has a current EBITDA of $-5.37 Mil. The current EBITDA is $-5.37 Mil. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is EBITDA calculated?
EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Functional Brands (MEHA), the current EBITDA is $-5.37 Mil as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Functional Brands Business Description

Address 6400 SW Rosewood Street, Lake Oswego, OR, USA, 97035
Functional Brands Inc operates in the nutraceutical supplement industry. It is a manufacturer and distributor of supplements in categories such as pain, energy, prenatal, general health, bone and joint, gastro, immunity, cardiac, detox, brain and memory, sleep, prenatal and urinary. It is focus on end-consumers through different channels that include pharmacies, wholesalers, international distributors and direct-to-consumers sales. The Company has two reportable segments: 1) Kirkman, which sells a range of nutraceuticals, supplements and related products direct to consumers; 2) HT Naturals, which sells a range of hemp products. Key revenue is generated from Kirkman.