AIRS (AirSculpt Technologies) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 24, 2026) — 25% Above Median


AIRS AirSculpt Technologies Inc AIRS
73 GF Score
Price $4.55
GF Value $3.93
Valuation Modestly Overvalued
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is AirSculpt Technologies Piotroski F-Score?

AirSculpt Technologies AIRS -1.20% 73 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026, which is 25% above its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates AIRS with a GF Score™ of 73/100 and a GF Value™ of $3.93 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 651 Healthcare Providers & Services companies, AirSculpt Technologies ranks better than 54.38% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

AirSculpt Technologies has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for AirSculpt Technologies's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

AIRS' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 7
Current: 5

During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of AirSculpt Technologies was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

AirSculpt Technologies  (NAS:AIRS) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


AirSculpt Technologies Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


AirSculpt Technologies Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for AirSculpt Technologies's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

AirSculpt Technologies Piotroski F-Score Chart

AirSculpt Technologies Annual Data
Trend Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A 4.00 6.00 2.00 3.00

AirSculpt Technologies Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00

AIRS vs CYH, CCRN, AUNA: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Medical Care Facilities subindustry, AirSculpt Technologies's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


AirSculpt Technologies Piotroski F-Score vs Healthcare Providers & Services Industry

For the Healthcare Providers & Services industry and Healthcare sector, AirSculpt Technologies's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where AirSculpt Technologies's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


AIRS
73GF Score
AirSculpt Technologies Inc AIRS
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.591 + -9.512 + 1.283 + -2.397 = $-11.2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 4.984 + -0.225 + -2.531 + 5.271 = $7.5 Mil.
Revenue was 44.012 + 34.993 + 33.442 + 39.389 = $151.8 Mil.
Gross Profit was 26.811 + 20.129 + 19.767 + 23.801 = $90.5 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(203.26 + 198.367 + 185.92 + 187.304 + 191.999) / 5 = $193.37 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $203.3 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $58.4 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $24.3 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $32.5 Mil.
Net Income was -3.206 + -6.04 + -4.801 + -2.847 = $-16.9 Mil.

Revenue was 51.004 + 42.548 + 39.178 + 39.371 = $172.1 Mil.
Gross Profit was 32.177 + 24.782 + 22.664 + 23.421 = $103.0 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(202.714 + 210.11 + 208.245 + 212.781 + 203.26) / 5 = $207.422 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $202.7 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $92.1 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $15.3 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $26.8 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

AirSculpt Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was -11.2. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

AirSculpt Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 7.5. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-11.217/203.26
=-0.05518548

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-16.894/202.714
=-0.08333909

AirSculpt Technologies's return on assets of this year was -0.05518548. AirSculpt Technologies's return on assets of last year was -0.08333909. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

AirSculpt Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was -11.2. AirSculpt Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 7.5. ==> 7.5 > -11.2 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=58.379/193.37
=0.30190309

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=92.096/207.422
=0.44400305

AirSculpt Technologies's gearing of this year was 0.30190309. AirSculpt Technologies's gearing of last year was 0.44400305. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=24.33/32.481
=0.74905329

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=15.298/26.788
=0.5710766

AirSculpt Technologies's current ratio of this year was 0.74905329. AirSculpt Technologies's current ratio of last year was 0.5710766. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

AirSculpt Technologies's number of shares in issue this year was 69.461. AirSculpt Technologies's number of shares in issue last year was 58.537. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=90.508/151.836
=0.59609052

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=103.044/172.101
=0.59874144

AirSculpt Technologies's gross margin of this year was 0.59609052. AirSculpt Technologies's gross margin of last year was 0.59874144. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=151.836/203.26
=0.74700384

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=172.101/202.714
=0.84898428

AirSculpt Technologies's asset turnover of this year was 0.74700384. AirSculpt Technologies's asset turnover of last year was 0.84898428. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+1+1+1+1+0+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

AirSculpt Technologies has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
AirSculpt Technologies (AIRS) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on AirSculpt Technologies and its competitors. This is 25% above median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, AirSculpt Technologies' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, AirSculpt Technologies ranks #297 out of 651 companies in the Healthcare Providers & Services industry, placing it in the top 45.6%.
Is AirSculpt Technologies' Piotroski F-Score too high?
AirSculpt Technologies' current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 25% above median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 7.00. The Healthcare Providers & Services industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. AirSculpt Technologies' value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, AirSculpt Technologies ranks #297 out of 651 companies in the Healthcare Providers & Services industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, AirSculpt Technologies has a GF Score™ of 73/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does AirSculpt Technologies' Piotroski F-Score compare to CYH and CCRN?
According to the Healthcare Providers & Services industry distribution chart, AirSculpt Technologies ranks #297 out of 651 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts AirSculpt Technologies in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. AirSculpt Technologies' value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, AirSculpt Technologies' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, AirSculpt Technologies has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Healthcare Providers & Services company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Healthcare Providers & Services companies is 5.00, based on 651 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. AirSculpt Technologies's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on AirSculpt Technologies and its competitors. For the Healthcare Providers & Services industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. AirSculpt Technologies's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 25% above median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is AirSculpt Technologies stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, AirSculpt Technologies (AIRS) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $3.93, compared to a current price of $4.55 — trading 15.6% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 25% above median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 0% at the Healthcare Providers & Services industry median of 5.00. AirSculpt Technologies' overall GF Score™ is 73/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For AirSculpt Technologies (AIRS), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is AirSculpt Technologies (AIRS) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, AirSculpt Technologies stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of $4.55 is trading 15.6% above its estimated GF Value™ of $3.93. GuruFocus considers AirSculpt Technologies to be Modestly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for AIRS:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (25% above median its 10-year median of 4.00)
  • GF Value™: $3.93 vs. price of $4.55 (15.6% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 73/100 with 3 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Healthcare Providers & Services median (#297 of 651)

No single metric tells the full story. See the AIRS stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


AirSculpt Technologies Business Description

Address 1111 Lincoln Road, Suite 802, Miami Beach, FL, USA, 33139
AirSculpt Technologies Inc is a next-generation body contouring treatment designed to optimize both comfort and precision, available exclusively at AirSculpt offices. The minimally invasive procedure removes fat and tightens skin while sculpting targeted areas of the body, allowing for quick healing with minimal bruising, tighter skin, and precise results. Its proprietary and patented AirSculpt method is minimally invasive because it requires no needle, no scalpel, no stitches, and no general anesthesia. It offers fat removal procedures across treatment areas and fat transfer procedures that use the patient's own fat cells to enhance the breasts, buttocks, hips or other areas and do not require silicone or foreign materials to be implanted. Its segment is direct medical procedure services.
73GF Score

Get the complete analysis for AIRS

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$4.55
Price
$3.93
GF Value