Pan Asia (ASX:PZC) Piotroski F-Score: 2 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — 33% Below Median


What is Pan Asia Piotroski F-Score?

Pan Asia ASX:PZC Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is 33% below its 10-year median of 3.00. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Pan Asia has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Pan Asia's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

ASX:PZC' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 3   Max: 5
Current: 2

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Pan Asia was 5. The lowest was 1. And the median was 3.

Pan Asia  (ASX:PZC) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Pan Asia Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Pan Asia Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Pan Asia's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Pan Asia Piotroski F-Score Chart

Pan Asia Annual Data
Trend Jun09 Jun10 Jun11 Jun12 Jun13 Jun14 Jun15 Jun16 Jun17 Jun18
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00

Pan Asia Semi-Annual Data
Dec08 Jun09 Dec09 Jun10 Dec10 Jun11 Dec11 Jun12 Dec12 Jun13 Dec13 Jun14 Dec14 Jun15 Dec15 Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Pan Asia Piotroski F-Score Competitor Comparison

For the Coking Coal subindustry, Pan Asia's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Pan Asia Piotroski F-Score vs Steel Industry

For the Steel industry and Basic Materials sector, Pan Asia's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Pan Asia's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun18) TTM:Last Year (Jun17) TTM:
Net Income was A$-1.42 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was A$-0.20 Mil.
Revenue was A$0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was A$0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun17)
to the end of this year (Jun18) was (0.071 + 0.128) / 2 = A$0.0995 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun17) was A$0.07 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was A$0.10 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was A$5.44 Mil.
Net Income was A$-0.60 Mil.

Revenue was A$0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was A$0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun16)
to the end of last year (Jun17) was (19.541 + 0.071) / 2 = A$9.806 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun16) was A$19.54 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$0.03 Mil.
Total Current Assets was A$0.03 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was A$5.09 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Pan Asia's current Net Income (TTM) was -1.42. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Pan Asia's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.20. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun17)
=-1.417/0.071
=-19.95774648

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun16)
=-0.597/19.541
=-0.03055115

Pan Asia's return on assets of this year was -19.95774648. Pan Asia's return on assets of last year was -0.03055115. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Pan Asia's current Net Income (TTM) was -1.42. Pan Asia's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.20. ==> -0.20 > -1.42 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun18)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun17 to Jun18
=0/0.0995
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Jun17)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun16 to Jun17
=0.029/9.806
=0.00295737

Pan Asia's gearing of this year was 0. Pan Asia's gearing of last year was 0.00295737. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun18)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.098/5.444
=0.01800147

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun17)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.034/5.091
=0.00667845

Pan Asia's current ratio of this year was 0.01800147. Pan Asia's current ratio of last year was 0.00667845. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Pan Asia's number of shares in issue this year was 862.584. Pan Asia's number of shares in issue last year was 490.665. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Pan Asia's gross margin of this year was . Pan Asia's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun17)
=0/0.071
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun16)
=0/19.541
=0

Pan Asia's asset turnover of this year was 0. Pan Asia's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+1+0+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Pan Asia has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 2 mean?
Pan Asia (ASX:PZC) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Pan Asia and its competitors. This is 33% below median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Pan Asia's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 5.00.
Is Pan Asia's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Pan Asia's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 5.00. The Steel industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Pan Asia's value of 2 is 60% below this industry median.
How does Pan Asia's Piotroski F-Score compare to competitors?
Pan Asia's Piotroski F-Score of 2 can be compared against companies in the Steel industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Pan Asia's value of 2 is 60% below this benchmark. Historically, Pan Asia's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Pan Asia has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Steel company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Steel companies is 5.00, based on 625 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Pan Asia's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 60% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Pan Asia and its competitors. For the Steel industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Pan Asia's current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 33% below median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Pan Asia stock overvalued right now?
Pan Asia (ASX:PZC) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 2. The current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 60% below the Steel industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Pan Asia (ASX:PZC), the current Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Pan Asia Business Description

Address 311-313 Hay Street, Subiaco, WA, AUS, 6008
Pan Asia Corp Ltd explores diversified energy resources mainly coal. The principal activities of the company are coal exploration and development in Indonesia. Its project includes PT Transcoal Minergy Project in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Geographically the company operates in Australia and Indonesia.