WAM Alternative Assets (ASX:WMA) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 24, 2026) — Near Median


ASX:WMA WAM Alternative Assets Ltd ASX:WMA
72 GF Score
Price A$0.98
GF Value A$1.08
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 4 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is WAM Alternative Assets Piotroski F-Score?

WAM Alternative Assets ASX:WMA -1.51% 72 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 24, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates ASX:WMA with a GF Score™ of 72/100 and a GF Value™ of A$1.08 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,601 Asset Management companies, WAM Alternative Assets ranks worse than 56.71% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

WAM Alternative Assets has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for WAM Alternative Assets's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

ASX:WMA' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 4   Max: 7
Current: 4

During the past 12 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of WAM Alternative Assets was 7. The lowest was 3. And the median was 4.

WAM Alternative Assets  (ASX:WMA) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


WAM Alternative Assets Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


WAM Alternative Assets Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for WAM Alternative Assets's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

WAM Alternative Assets Piotroski F-Score Chart

WAM Alternative Assets Annual Data
Trend Jun16 Jun17 Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Jun22 Jun23 Jun24 Jun25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 4.00

WAM Alternative Assets Semi-Annual Data
Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 0.00

ASX:WMA vs BLK, BX, KKR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Asset Management subindustry, WAM Alternative Assets's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


WAM Alternative Assets Piotroski F-Score vs Asset Management Industry

For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, WAM Alternative Assets's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where WAM Alternative Assets's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


ASX:WMA
72GF Score
WAM Alternative Assets Ltd ASX:WMA
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun25) TTM:Last Year (Jun24) TTM:
Net Income was A$6.23 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was A$-11.53 Mil.
Revenue was A$11.57 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun24)
to the end of this year (Jun25) was (277.667 + 274.924) / 2 = A$276.2955 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun24) was A$277.67 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was A$274.92 Mil.
Total Liabilities was A$47.97 Mil.
Net Income was A$6.34 Mil.

Revenue was A$11.26 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun23)
to the end of last year (Jun24) was (291.479 + 277.667) / 2 = A$284.573 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun23) was A$291.48 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was A$277.67 Mil.
Total Liabilities was A$47.25 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

WAM Alternative Assets's current Net Income (TTM) was 6.23. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

WAM Alternative Assets's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -11.53. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun24)
=6.232/277.667
=0.02244415

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun23)
=6.344/291.479
=0.02176486

WAM Alternative Assets's return on assets of this year was 0.02244415. WAM Alternative Assets's return on assets of last year was 0.02176486. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

WAM Alternative Assets's current Net Income (TTM) was 6.23. WAM Alternative Assets's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -11.53. ==> -11.53 <= 6.23 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun24 to Jun25
=0/276.2955
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Jun24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun23 to Jun24
=0/284.573
=0

WAM Alternative Assets's gearing of this year was 0. WAM Alternative Assets's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun25)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=274.924/47.966
=5.73164325

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun24)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=277.667/47.251
=5.8764259

WAM Alternative Assets's current ratio of this year was 5.73164325. WAM Alternative Assets's current ratio of last year was 5.8764259. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

WAM Alternative Assets's number of shares in issue this year was 196.111. WAM Alternative Assets's number of shares in issue last year was 195.461. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.

Net Margin (This Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=6.232/11.571
=0.53858785

Net Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=6.344/11.262
=0.56331025

WAM Alternative Assets's net margin of this year was 0.53858785. WAM Alternative Assets's net margin of last year was 0.56331025. ==> Last year's net margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun24)
=11.571/277.667
=0.04167222

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun23)
=11.262/291.479
=0.03863743

WAM Alternative Assets's asset turnover of this year was 0.04167222. WAM Alternative Assets's asset turnover of last year was 0.03863743. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+1+0+1+0+0+0+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

WAM Alternative Assets has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
WAM Alternative Assets (ASX:WMA) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on WAM Alternative Assets and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, WAM Alternative Assets' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, WAM Alternative Assets ranks #908 out of 1601 companies in the Asset Management industry, placing it in the top 56.7%.
Is WAM Alternative Assets' Piotroski F-Score too high?
WAM Alternative Assets' current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is near median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 7.00. The Asset Management industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. WAM Alternative Assets' value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, WAM Alternative Assets ranks #908 out of 1601 companies in the Asset Management industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, WAM Alternative Assets has a GF Score™ of 72/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does WAM Alternative Assets' Piotroski F-Score compare to BLK and BX?
According to the Asset Management industry distribution chart, WAM Alternative Assets ranks #908 out of 1601 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places WAM Alternative Assets in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. WAM Alternative Assets' value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, WAM Alternative Assets' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, WAM Alternative Assets has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Asset Management company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Asset Management companies is 5.00, based on 1,601 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. WAM Alternative Assets's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on WAM Alternative Assets and its competitors. For the Asset Management industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. WAM Alternative Assets's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is WAM Alternative Assets stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, WAM Alternative Assets (ASX:WMA) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is A$1.08, compared to a current price of A$0.98 — trading 9.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 20% below the Asset Management industry median of 5.00. WAM Alternative Assets' overall GF Score™ is 72/100 with 4 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For WAM Alternative Assets (ASX:WMA), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is WAM Alternative Assets (ASX:WMA) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, WAM Alternative Assets stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of A$0.98 is trading 9.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of A$1.08. GuruFocus considers WAM Alternative Assets to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for ASX:WMA:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (near median its 10-year median of 4.00)
  • GF Value™: A$1.08 vs. price of A$0.98 (9.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 72/100 with 4 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Asset Management median (#908 of 1601)

No single metric tells the full story. See the ASX:WMA stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


WAM Alternative Assets Business Description

Address 1 Farrer Place, Level 26, Governor Phillip Tower, Sydney, NSW, AUS, 4000
WAM Alternative Assets Ltd is an investment company. Its investment objectives are to deliver absolute returns through a combination of dividend yield and capital growth, while providing diversification benefits to shareholders. The company provides investors with exposure to a portfolio of real assets, private equity, infrastructure, real estate, and private debt strategies.
72GF Score

Get the complete analysis for ASX:WMA

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

A$0.98
Price
A$1.08
GF Value