Beijing KMT Technology Co (BJSE:920189) Piotroski F-Score: N/A (As of Aug. 30, 2026)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

BJSE:920189 Beijing KMT Technology Co Ltd BJSE:920189
45 GF Score
Price ¥21.52
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Beijing KMT Technology Co Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Beijing KMT Technology Co has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Beijing KMT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

Beijing KMT Technology Co  (BJSE:920189) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Beijing KMT Technology Co Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Beijing KMT Technology Co Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Beijing KMT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Beijing KMT Technology Co Piotroski F-Score Chart

Beijing KMT Technology Co Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Beijing KMT Technology Co Quarterly Data
Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26 Jun26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BJSE:920189 vs LIN, SHW, ECL: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Specialty Chemicals subindustry, Beijing KMT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Beijing KMT Technology Co Piotroski F-Score vs Chemicals Industry

For the Chemicals industry and Basic Materials sector, Beijing KMT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Beijing KMT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


BJSE:920189
45GF Score
Beijing KMT Technology Co Ltd BJSE:920189
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun26) TTM:Last Year (Jun25) TTM:
Net Income was 27.262 + 22.579 + 21.606 + 27.821 = ¥99.3 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 18.599 + 30.774 + -5.242 + 12.141 = ¥56.3 Mil.
Revenue was 124.241 + 116.27 + 114.431 + 164.326 = ¥519.3 Mil.
Gross Profit was 54.198 + 49.324 + 114.431 + 0.129 = ¥218.1 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun25)
to the end of this year (Jun26) was
(655.209 + 684.507 + 707.311 + 709.98 + 727.344) / 5 = ¥696.8702 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun25) was ¥655.2 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥14.4 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥385.7 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥68.0 Mil.
Net Income was 13.739 + 18.563 + 17.315 + 18.172 = ¥67.8 Mil.

Revenue was 113.009 + 111.459 + 99.737 + 129.072 = ¥453.3 Mil.
Gross Profit was 41.285 + 46.741 + 99.737 + -11.961 = ¥175.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun24)
to the end of last year (Jun25) was
(576.233 + 0 + 595.317 + 598.041 + 655.209) / 5 = ¥606.2 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun24) was ¥576.2 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥24.5 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥334.1 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥90.4 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Beijing KMT Technology Co's current Net Income (TTM) was 99.3. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Beijing KMT Technology Co's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 56.3. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun25)
=99.268/655.209
=0.15150586

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun24)
=67.789/576.233
=0.11764165

Beijing KMT Technology Co's return on assets of this year was 0.15150586. Beijing KMT Technology Co's return on assets of last year was 0.11764165. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Beijing KMT Technology Co's current Net Income (TTM) was 99.3. Beijing KMT Technology Co's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 56.3. ==> 56.3 <= 99.3 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun25 to Jun26
=14.412/696.8702
=0.02068104

Gearing (Last Year: Jun25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun24 to Jun25
=24.46/606.2
=0.04034972

Beijing KMT Technology Co's gearing of this year was 0.02068104. Beijing KMT Technology Co's gearing of last year was 0.04034972. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=385.665/68.043
=5.66795997

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=334.119/90.382
=3.69674271

Beijing KMT Technology Co's current ratio of this year was 5.66795997. Beijing KMT Technology Co's current ratio of last year was 3.69674271. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Beijing KMT Technology Co's number of shares in issue this year was 120.553. Beijing KMT Technology Co's number of shares in issue last year was 118.289. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=218.082/519.268
=0.41997966

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=175.802/453.277
=0.38784673

Beijing KMT Technology Co's gross margin of this year was 0.41997966. Beijing KMT Technology Co's gross margin of last year was 0.38784673. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun25)
=519.268/655.209
=0.79252269

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun24)
=453.277/576.233
=0.78662104

Beijing KMT Technology Co's asset turnover of this year was 0.79252269. Beijing KMT Technology Co's asset turnover of last year was 0.78662104. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+0+1+1+0+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Beijing KMT Technology Co has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.


Beijing KMT Technology Co Business Description

Address No. 9 Yongteng North Road, Room 101, 1st Floor, Building 7, Haidian District, Beijing, CHN, 100094
Beijing KMT Technology Co Ltd is engaged in the research, development, production and sales of new polymer materials such as electronic packaging materials and high-performance modified plastics. The company's main business includes the production and sale of electrolytic manganese dioxide and new energy battery materials, centralized treatment of urban sewage, and industrial trade. Its products are divided into five main categories: carbon-zinc battery grade, mercury-free alkaline manganese battery grade, primary lithium manganese battery grade, lithium manganese oxide battery grade, and high-performance battery grade. These products are exported to various countries and regions including Southeast Asia, South Asia, and South America.
45GF Score

Get the complete analysis for BJSE:920189

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

¥21.52
Price