NL Development PCL (BKK:NL) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 33% Above Median


BKK:NL NL Development PCL BKK:NL
17 GF Score
Price ฿0.70
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is NL Development PCL Piotroski F-Score?

NL Development PCL BKK:NL +1.45% 17 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 33% above its 10-year median of 3.00. GuruFocus rates BKK:NL with a GF Score™ of 17/100. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,735 Construction companies, NL Development PCL ranks worse than 65.36% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

NL Development PCL has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for NL Development PCL's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

BKK:NL' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 3   Max: 4
Current: 4

During the past 5 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of NL Development PCL was 4. The lowest was 3. And the median was 3.

NL Development PCL  (BKK:NL) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


NL Development PCL Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


NL Development PCL Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for NL Development PCL's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

NL Development PCL Piotroski F-Score Chart

NL Development PCL Annual Data
Trend Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A N/A 3.00 3.00

NL Development PCL Quarterly Data
Dec21 Mar22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 N/A N/A 3.00 4.00

BKK:NL vs PWR, FIX, EME: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Engineering & Construction subindustry, NL Development PCL's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


NL Development PCL Piotroski F-Score vs Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, NL Development PCL's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where NL Development PCL's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


BKK:NL
17GF Score
NL Development PCL BKK:NL
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -19.566 + -8.021 + 7.206 + -5.081 = ฿-25 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -143.024 + 1.983 + 117.151 + -82.856 = ฿-107 Mil.
Revenue was 188.011 + 295.648 + 368.453 + 324.337 = ฿1,176 Mil.
Gross Profit was 16.232 + 31.15 + 41.93 + 37.516 = ฿127 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(1492.446 + 1345.141 + 1337.249 + 1374.985 + 1371.376) / 5 = ฿1384.2394 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was ฿1,492 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ฿10 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ฿1,077 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ฿506 Mil.
Net Income was 5.495 + 1.95 + -12.307 + 5.694 = ฿1 Mil.

Revenue was 336.709 + 318.948 + 278.128 + 310.759 = ฿1,245 Mil.
Gross Profit was 41.464 + 39.339 + 21.369 + 43.914 = ฿146 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(1723.639 + 1668.73 + 1598.766 + 1490.818 + 1492.446) / 5 = ฿1594.8798 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was ฿1,724 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ฿12 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ฿1,164 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ฿557 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

NL Development PCL's current Net Income (TTM) was -25. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

NL Development PCL's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -107. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-25.462/1492.446
=-0.01706058

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=0.832/1723.639
=0.0004827

NL Development PCL's return on assets of this year was -0.01706058. NL Development PCL's return on assets of last year was 0.0004827. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

NL Development PCL's current Net Income (TTM) was -25. NL Development PCL's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -107. ==> -107 <= -25 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=9.669/1384.2394
=0.00698506

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=11.679/1594.8798
=0.00732281

NL Development PCL's gearing of this year was 0.00698506. NL Development PCL's gearing of last year was 0.00732281. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1077.281/506.054
=2.12878665

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1163.838/556.782
=2.09029387

NL Development PCL's current ratio of this year was 2.12878665. NL Development PCL's current ratio of last year was 2.09029387. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

NL Development PCL's number of shares in issue this year was 500. NL Development PCL's number of shares in issue last year was 500. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=126.828/1176.449
=0.10780578

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=146.086/1244.544
=0.11738115

NL Development PCL's gross margin of this year was 0.10780578. NL Development PCL's gross margin of last year was 0.11738115. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=1176.449/1492.446
=0.78826906

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=1244.544/1723.639
=0.72204447

NL Development PCL's asset turnover of this year was 0.78826906. NL Development PCL's asset turnover of last year was 0.72204447. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+0+1+1+1+0+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

NL Development PCL has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
NL Development PCL (BKK:NL) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on NL Development PCL and its competitors. This is 33% above median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, NL Development PCL's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 4.00. According to the industry distribution chart, NL Development PCL ranks #1134 out of 1735 companies in the Construction industry, placing it in the top 65.4%.
Is NL Development PCL's Piotroski F-Score too high?
NL Development PCL's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 33% above median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 4.00. The Construction industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. NL Development PCL's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, NL Development PCL ranks #1134 out of 1735 companies in the Construction industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, NL Development PCL has a GF Score™ of 17/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does NL Development PCL's Piotroski F-Score compare to PWR and FIX?
According to the Construction industry distribution chart, NL Development PCL ranks #1134 out of 1735 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places NL Development PCL in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. NL Development PCL's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, NL Development PCL's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 4.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, NL Development PCL has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Construction company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Construction companies is 5.00, based on 1,735 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. NL Development PCL's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on NL Development PCL and its competitors. For the Construction industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. NL Development PCL's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 33% above median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is NL Development PCL stock overvalued right now?
NL Development PCL (BKK:NL) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 33% above median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 20% below the Construction industry median of 5.00. NL Development PCL's overall GF Score™ is 17/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For NL Development PCL (BKK:NL), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

NL Development PCL Business Description

Address 417 Ratchawithi Road, Bang Phlat District, Bangkok, THA, 10700
NL Development PCL is engaged in business of contractor and general construction. It provides surveying, design, and construction services for all types of buildings, including the installation of various engineering systems and public infrastructure construction.
17GF Score

Get the complete analysis for BKK:NL

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

฿0.70
Price