BLKB (Blackbaud) Piotroski F-Score: 8 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — 33% Above Median


BLKB Blackbaud Inc BLKB
53 GF Score
Price $27.73
GF Value $84.52
Valuation Possible Value Trap
! 6 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Blackbaud Piotroski F-Score?

Blackbaud BLKB +0.51% 53 Piotroski F-Score is 8 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is 33% above its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates BLKB with a GF Score™ of 53/100 and a GF Value™ of $84.52 (Possible Value Trap). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,742 Software companies, Blackbaud ranks better than 98.69% on this metric.

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 8, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Blackbaud has an F-score of 8. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Blackbaud's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

BLKB' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 6   Max: 8
Current: 8

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Blackbaud was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 6.

Blackbaud  (NAS:BLKB) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Blackbaud Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Blackbaud Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Blackbaud's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Blackbaud Piotroski F-Score Chart

Blackbaud Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 8.00 6.00 8.00

Blackbaud Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 6.00 5.00 8.00 8.00

BLKB vs CXM, KARO, VIA: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Software - Application subindustry, Blackbaud's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Blackbaud Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Blackbaud's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Blackbaud's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


BLKB
53GF Score
Blackbaud Inc BLKB
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 25.98 + 47.492 + 36.689 + 31.139 = $141 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 66.941 + 139.211 + 58.01 + 51.459 = $316 Mil.
Revenue was 281.382 + 281.143 + 295.256 + 281.14 = $1,139 Mil.
Gross Profit was 167.749 + 167.49 + 172.284 + 166.559 = $674 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(2102.219 + 2629.393 + 2104.441 + 2390.682 + 2109.298) / 5 = $2267.2066 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $2,102 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1,163 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $642 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $867 Mil.
Net Income was 21.804 + 18.29 + -346.364 + 4.323 = $-302 Mil.

Revenue was 287.286 + 286.598 + 302.113 + 269.936 = $1,146 Mil.
Gross Profit was 162.586 + 157.308 + 162.53 + 155.121 = $638 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(2549.134 + 3042.748 + 2600.974 + 2496 + 2102.219) / 5 = $2558.215 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $2,549 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1,185 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $627 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $864 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Blackbaud's current Net Income (TTM) was 141. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Blackbaud's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 316. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=141.3/2102.219
=0.06721469

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-301.947/2549.134
=-0.11845082

Blackbaud's return on assets of this year was 0.06721469. Blackbaud's return on assets of last year was -0.11845082. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Blackbaud's current Net Income (TTM) was 141. Blackbaud's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 316. ==> 316 > 141 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=1163.182/2267.2066
=0.51304632

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=1184.738/2558.215
=0.46311119

Blackbaud's gearing of this year was 0.51304632. Blackbaud's gearing of last year was 0.46311119. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=642.221/866.679
=0.74101369

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=627.452/863.898
=0.72630334

Blackbaud's current ratio of this year was 0.74101369. Blackbaud's current ratio of last year was 0.72630334. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Blackbaud's number of shares in issue this year was 46.351. Blackbaud's number of shares in issue last year was 49.445. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=674.082/1138.921
=0.59186019

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=637.545/1145.933
=0.55635452

Blackbaud's gross margin of this year was 0.59186019. Blackbaud's gross margin of last year was 0.55635452. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=1138.921/2102.219
=0.54177086

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=1145.933/2549.134
=0.44953816

Blackbaud's asset turnover of this year was 0.54177086. Blackbaud's asset turnover of last year was 0.44953816. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+0+1+1+1+1
=8

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Blackbaud has an F-score of 8. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 8 mean?
Blackbaud (BLKB) has a Piotroski F-Score of 8 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Blackbaud and its competitors. This is 33% above median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Blackbaud's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Blackbaud ranks #36 out of 2742 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 1.3%.
Is Blackbaud's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Blackbaud's current Piotroski F-Score of 8 is 33% above median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Blackbaud's value of 8 is 60% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Blackbaud ranks #36 out of 2742 companies in the Software industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Blackbaud has a GF Score™ of 53/100 and is considered Possible Value Trap, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Blackbaud's Piotroski F-Score compare to CXM and KARO?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Blackbaud ranks #36 out of 2742 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Blackbaud in the top 1% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Blackbaud's value of 8 is 60% above this benchmark. Historically, Blackbaud's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Blackbaud has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,742 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Blackbaud's current Piotroski F-Score of 8 is 60% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Blackbaud and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Blackbaud's current Piotroski F-Score is 8, which is 33% above median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Blackbaud stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Blackbaud (BLKB) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is $84.52, compared to a current price of $27.73 — trading 67.2% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 8, which is 33% above median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 60% above the Software industry median of 5.00. Blackbaud's overall GF Score™ is 53/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Blackbaud (BLKB), the current Piotroski F-Score is 8 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Blackbaud (BLKB) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Blackbaud stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $27.73 is trading 67.2% below its estimated GF Value™ of $84.52. GuruFocus considers Blackbaud to be Possible Value Trap.

Key valuation signals for BLKB:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 8 (33% above median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: $84.52 vs. price of $27.73 (67.2% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 53/100 with 6 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 60% above the Software median (#36 of 2742)

No single metric tells the full story. See the BLKB stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Blackbaud Business Description

Address 65 Fairchild Street, Charleston, SC, USA, 29492
Founded in 1981, Blackbaud provides software solutions designed to serve the "social good" community, including nonprofits, foundations, corporations, educational institutions, healthcare institutions, and individual change agents. Through M&A and organic product development efforts, the company has also moved into related areas outside core fundraising, notably into K-12 schools. The firm enables more than $100 billion in donations annually across a customer base in excess of 40,000 customers in over 100 countries.
53GF Score

Get the complete analysis for BLKB

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$27.73
Price
$84.52
GF Value