Martin Burn (BOM:523566) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jul. 07, 2026) — 57% Below Median


BOM:523566 Martin Burn Ltd BOM:523566
44 GF Score
Price ₹44.50
GF Value ₹2.26
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Martin Burn Piotroski F-Score?

Martin Burn BOM:523566 44 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jul. 07, 2026, which is 57% below its 10-year median of 7.00. GuruFocus rates BOM:523566 with a GF Score™ of 44/100 and a GF Value™ of ₹2.26 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,755 Real Estate companies, Martin Burn ranks worse than 81.54% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Martin Burn has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Martin Burn's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

BOM:523566' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 7   Max: 8
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Martin Burn was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 7.

Martin Burn  (BOM:523566) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Martin Burn Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Martin Burn Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Martin Burn's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Martin Burn Piotroski F-Score Chart

Martin Burn Annual Data
Trend Mar17 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 8.00 3.00 7.00 7.00 3.00

Martin Burn Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00

BOM:523566 vs CBRE, BEKE, JLL: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Real Estate Services subindustry, Martin Burn's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Martin Burn Piotroski F-Score vs Real Estate Industry

For the Real Estate industry and Real Estate sector, Martin Burn's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Martin Burn's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


BOM:523566
44GF Score
Martin Burn Ltd BOM:523566
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was ₹18.99 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was ₹-116.42 Mil.
Revenue was ₹0.18 Mil.
Gross Profit was ₹-0.05 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was (1021.975 + 953.353) / 2 = ₹987.664 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was ₹1,021.98 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₹1.18 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₹131.81 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₹10.96 Mil.
Net Income was ₹59.92 Mil.

Revenue was ₹3.21 Mil.
Gross Profit was ₹3.01 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was (1008.351 + 1021.975) / 2 = ₹1015.163 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was ₹1,008.35 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₹1.43 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₹118.38 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₹64.59 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Martin Burn's current Net Income (TTM) was 18.99. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Martin Burn's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -116.42. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=18.992/1021.975
=0.01858362

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=59.924/1008.351
=0.05942772

Martin Burn's return on assets of this year was 0.01858362. Martin Burn's return on assets of last year was 0.05942772. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Martin Burn's current Net Income (TTM) was 18.99. Martin Burn's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -116.42. ==> -116.42 <= 18.99 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=1.175/987.664
=0.00118968

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=1.432/1015.163
=0.00141061

Martin Burn's gearing of this year was 0.00118968. Martin Burn's gearing of last year was 0.00141061. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=131.807/10.963
=12.02289519

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=118.38/64.592
=1.8327347

Martin Burn's current ratio of this year was 12.02289519. Martin Burn's current ratio of last year was 1.8327347. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Martin Burn's number of shares in issue this year was 5.161. Martin Burn's number of shares in issue last year was 5.153. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-0.052/0.182
=-0.28571429

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3.011/3.214
=0.93683883

Martin Burn's gross margin of this year was -0.28571429. Martin Burn's gross margin of last year was 0.93683883. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=0.182/1021.975
=0.00017809

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=3.214/1008.351
=0.00318738

Martin Burn's asset turnover of this year was 0.00017809. Martin Burn's asset turnover of last year was 0.00318738. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+1+1+0+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Martin Burn has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Martin Burn (BOM:523566) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jul. 07, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Martin Burn and its competitors. This is 57% below median its historical median of 7.00. Over the past decade, Martin Burn's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Martin Burn ranks #1431 out of 1755 companies in the Real Estate industry, placing it in the top 81.5%.
Is Martin Burn's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Martin Burn's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 57% below median its 10-year median of 7.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Real Estate industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Martin Burn's value of 3 is 40% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Martin Burn ranks #1431 out of 1755 companies in the Real Estate industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Martin Burn has a GF Score™ of 44/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Martin Burn's Piotroski F-Score compare to CBRE and BEKE?
According to the Real Estate industry distribution chart, Martin Burn ranks #1431 out of 1755 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Martin Burn in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Martin Burn's value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Martin Burn's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 7.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Martin Burn has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Real Estate company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Real Estate companies is 5.00, based on 1,755 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Martin Burn's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Martin Burn and its competitors. For the Real Estate industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Martin Burn's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 57% below median its own 10-year median of 7.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Martin Burn stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Martin Burn (BOM:523566) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is ₹2.26, compared to a current price of ₹44.50 — trading 1869% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 57% below median its 10-year median of 7.00 and 40% below the Real Estate industry median of 5.00. Martin Burn's overall GF Score™ is 44/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Martin Burn (BOM:523566), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jul. 07, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Martin Burn (BOM:523566) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Martin Burn stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of ₹44.50 is trading 1869% above its estimated GF Value™ of ₹2.26. GuruFocus considers Martin Burn to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for BOM:523566:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 3 (57% below median its 10-year median of 7.00)
  • GF Value™: ₹2.26 vs. price of ₹44.50 (1869% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 44/100 with 5 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% below the Real Estate median (#1431 of 1755)

No single metric tells the full story. See the BOM:523566 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Martin Burn Business Description

Address 1, R.N. Mukherjee Road, Martin Burn House, 1st Floor, Kolkata, WB, IND, 700 001
Martin Burn Ltd is an India-based company engaged in the business of real estate development. The company's operating segment includes Construction/Property Development Business and Rent, and its related activities. It generates maximum revenue from the Rent and its related activities segment.
44GF Score

Get the complete analysis for BOM:523566

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

₹44.50
Price
₹2.26
GF Value