Sugs Lloyd (BOM:544501) Piotroski F-Score: N/A (As of Jul. 26, 2026)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

BOM:544501 Sugs Lloyd Ltd BOM:544501
16 GF Score
Price ₹132.00
! 1 Warning Sign
View Full Analysis

What is Sugs Lloyd Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Sugs Lloyd has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Sugs Lloyd's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

Sugs Lloyd  (BOM:544501) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Sugs Lloyd Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Sugs Lloyd Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Sugs Lloyd's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Sugs Lloyd Piotroski F-Score Chart

Sugs Lloyd Annual Data
Trend Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Sugs Lloyd Quarterly Data
Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

BOM:544501 vs PWR, FIX, EME: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Engineering & Construction subindustry, Sugs Lloyd's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Sugs Lloyd Piotroski F-Score vs Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, Sugs Lloyd's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Sugs Lloyd's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


BOM:544501
16GF Score
Sugs Lloyd Ltd BOM:544501
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was 100.356 + 0 + 61.1 + 169.881 = ₹331 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = ₹0 Mil.
Revenue was 1128.379 + 0 + 625.714 + 1776.949 = ₹3,531 Mil.
Gross Profit was 453.699 + 0 + 277.36 + 662.732 = ₹1,394 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(0 + 1334.977 + 2413.426 + 0 + 2696.278) / 5 = ₹2148.227 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was ₹0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₹2 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₹2,176 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₹1,275 Mil.
Net Income was 0 + 35.329 + 32.091 + 49.996 = ₹117 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 254.93 + 378.677 + 521.901 = ₹1,156 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 96.215 + 189.919 + 240.022 = ₹526 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was
(246.524 + 482.271 + 648.493 + 0 + 0) / 5 = ₹459.096 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar23) was ₹247 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₹0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₹0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₹0 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Sugs Lloyd's current Net Income (TTM) was 331. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Sugs Lloyd's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=331.337/0
=

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar23)
=117.416/246.524
=0.47628628

Sugs Lloyd's return on assets of this year was . Sugs Lloyd's return on assets of last year was 0.47628628. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Sugs Lloyd's current Net Income (TTM) was 331. Sugs Lloyd's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0. ==> 0 <= 331 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Mar26
=2.092/2148.227
=0.00097383

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar23 to Dec24
=0/459.096
=0

Sugs Lloyd's gearing of this year was 0.00097383. Sugs Lloyd's gearing of last year was 0. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2176.343/1275.095
=1.70680851

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0/0
=

Sugs Lloyd's current ratio of this year was 1.70680851. Sugs Lloyd's current ratio of last year was . ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Sugs Lloyd's number of shares in issue this year was 23.214. Sugs Lloyd's number of shares in issue last year was 23.214. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1393.791/3531.042
=0.39472513

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=526.156/1155.508
=0.45534605

Sugs Lloyd's gross margin of this year was 0.39472513. Sugs Lloyd's gross margin of last year was 0.45534605. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=3531.042/0
=

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar23)
=1155.508/246.524
=4.68720287

Sugs Lloyd's asset turnover of this year was . Sugs Lloyd's asset turnover of last year was 4.68720287. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+0+1+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Sugs Lloyd has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.


Sugs Lloyd Business Description

Address Sector 2, C 96 First Floor, C Block, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Noida, UP, IND, 201301
Sugs Lloyd Ltd operates in the renewable energy sector, with a primary focus on solar energy, electrical transmission and distribution, and civil EPC projects. It provides a wide range of services, including the development of power transmission and distribution infrastructure, construction of power substations, and the renovation, upgrading, and modification of existing power systems. It also engages in providing solutions for Outage Management Solutions using fault passage indicators, auto reclosers, and sectionalizers to various electricity DISCOMs. The product range includes Auto Reclosers, Sectionalisers, Fault Passage Indicators, Cable Joints, and Terminations.
16GF Score

Get the complete analysis for BOM:544501

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

₹132.00
Price