BWMN (Bowman Consulting Group) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 26, 2026) — Near Median


BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd BWMN
76 GF Score
Price $29.03
GF Value $36.67
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 6 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Bowman Consulting Group Piotroski F-Score?

Bowman Consulting Group BWMN -0.75% 76 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 26, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates BWMN with a GF Score™ of 76/100 and a GF Value™ of $36.67 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,735 Construction companies, Bowman Consulting Group ranks better than 52.8% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Bowman Consulting Group has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Bowman Consulting Group's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

BWMN' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 5

During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Bowman Consulting Group was 7. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

Bowman Consulting Group  (NAS:BWMN) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Bowman Consulting Group Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Bowman Consulting Group Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Bowman Consulting Group's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Bowman Consulting Group Piotroski F-Score Chart

Bowman Consulting Group Annual Data
Trend Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 6.00 5.00 4.00 7.00 6.00

Bowman Consulting Group Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00

BWMN vs ORN, BBCP, MCDIF: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Engineering & Construction subindustry, Bowman Consulting Group's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Bowman Consulting Group Piotroski F-Score vs Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, Bowman Consulting Group's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Bowman Consulting Group's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


BWMN
76GF Score
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd BWMN
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 6.009 + 6.618 + 1.966 + -3.702 = $10.9 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 4.259 + 10.178 + 9.356 + 11.578 = $35.4 Mil.
Revenue was 122.09 + 126.033 + 128.963 + 126.479 = $503.6 Mil.
Gross Profit was 65.572 + 66.924 + 70.952 + 65.891 = $269.3 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(528.749 + 538.245 + 510.176 + 579.682 + 589.768) / 5 = $549.324 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $528.7 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $95.6 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $222.1 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $237.9 Mil.
Net Income was -2.082 + 0.771 + 5.903 + -1.744 = $2.8 Mil.

Revenue was 104.501 + 113.932 + 113.223 + 112.931 = $444.6 Mil.
Gross Profit was 54.885 + 59.65 + 60.241 + 58.097 = $232.9 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(420.538 + 463.387 + 496.957 + 505.881 + 528.749) / 5 = $483.1024 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $420.5 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $73.5 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $189.0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $150.6 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Bowman Consulting Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 10.9. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Bowman Consulting Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 35.4. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=10.891/528.749
=0.02059767

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=2.848/420.538
=0.00677228

Bowman Consulting Group's return on assets of this year was 0.02059767. Bowman Consulting Group's return on assets of last year was 0.00677228. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Bowman Consulting Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 10.9. Bowman Consulting Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 35.4. ==> 35.4 > 10.9 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=95.605/549.324
=0.17404119

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=73.502/483.1024
=0.1521458

Bowman Consulting Group's gearing of this year was 0.17404119. Bowman Consulting Group's gearing of last year was 0.1521458. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=222.05/237.929
=0.9332616

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=188.95/150.593
=1.25470639

Bowman Consulting Group's current ratio of this year was 0.9332616. Bowman Consulting Group's current ratio of last year was 1.25470639. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Bowman Consulting Group's number of shares in issue this year was 16.453. Bowman Consulting Group's number of shares in issue last year was 16.356. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=269.339/503.565
=0.53486442

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=232.873/444.587
=0.52379624

Bowman Consulting Group's gross margin of this year was 0.53486442. Bowman Consulting Group's gross margin of last year was 0.52379624. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=503.565/528.749
=0.9523706

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=444.587/420.538
=1.05718627

Bowman Consulting Group's asset turnover of this year was 0.9523706. Bowman Consulting Group's asset turnover of last year was 1.05718627. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+0+0+0+1+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Bowman Consulting Group has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Bowman Consulting Group and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Bowman Consulting Group's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Bowman Consulting Group ranks #819 out of 1735 companies in the Construction industry, placing it in the top 47.2%.
Is Bowman Consulting Group's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Bowman Consulting Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 7.00. The Construction industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Bowman Consulting Group's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Bowman Consulting Group ranks #819 out of 1735 companies in the Construction industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Bowman Consulting Group has a GF Score™ of 76/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Bowman Consulting Group's Piotroski F-Score compare to ORN and BBCP?
According to the Construction industry distribution chart, Bowman Consulting Group ranks #819 out of 1735 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Bowman Consulting Group in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Bowman Consulting Group's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Bowman Consulting Group's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Bowman Consulting Group has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Construction company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Construction companies is 5.00, based on 1,735 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Bowman Consulting Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Bowman Consulting Group and its competitors. For the Construction industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Bowman Consulting Group's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Bowman Consulting Group stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $36.67, compared to a current price of $29.03 — trading 20.8% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Construction industry median of 5.00. Bowman Consulting Group's overall GF Score™ is 76/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Bowman Consulting Group stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $29.03 is trading 20.8% below its estimated GF Value™ of $36.67. GuruFocus considers Bowman Consulting Group to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for BWMN:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: $36.67 vs. price of $29.03 (20.8% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 76/100 with 6 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Construction median (#819 of 1735)

No single metric tells the full story. See the BWMN stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Bowman Consulting Group Business Description

Address 12355 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 520, Reston, VA, USA, 20191
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd is a professional services firm delivering engineering solutions to customers who own, develop, and maintain the built environment. It provides planning, engineering, construction management, commissioning, environmental consulting, geospatial, survey, land procurement, and other technical services to customers operating in a diverse set of end markets. Its services include Civil & Site Engineering, Transportation Engineering, MEP Engineering, Commissioning & Energy Efficiency, Energy Services, Water/Wastewater, Fire Protection, Construction Management, Survey/Geospatial, Environmental Consulting, Structural Engineering, Land Procurement & Right-of-Way, Landscape and Architecture/Planning.
76GF Score

Get the complete analysis for BWMN

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$29.03
Price
$36.67
GF Value