CDEVF (City Developments) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 24, 2026) — Near Median


CDEVF City Developments Ltd CDEVF
67 GF Score
Price $6.49
GF Value $4.55
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 7 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is City Developments Piotroski F-Score?

City Developments CDEVF -3.85% 67 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates CDEVF with a GF Score™ of 67/100 and a GF Value™ of $4.55 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,756 Real Estate companies, City Developments ranks better than 60.99% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

City Developments has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for City Developments's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

CDEVF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of City Developments was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.

City Developments  (OTCPK:CDEVF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


City Developments Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


City Developments Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for City Developments's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

City Developments Piotroski F-Score Chart

City Developments Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

City Developments Semi-Annual Data
Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00

City Developments Piotroski F-Score Competitor Comparison

For the Real Estate - Development subindustry, City Developments's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


City Developments Piotroski F-Score vs Real Estate Industry

For the Real Estate industry and Real Estate sector, City Developments's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where City Developments's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


CDEVF
67GF Score
City Developments Ltd CDEVF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was $488 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $-1,171 Mil.
Revenue was $2,779 Mil.
Gross Profit was $1,134 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was (18962.446 + 20956.891) / 2 = $19959.6685 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was $18,962 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $8,399 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $8,584 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $3,847 Mil.
Net Income was $149 Mil.

Revenue was $2,422 Mil.
Gross Profit was $1,083 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was (18192.344 + 18962.446) / 2 = $18577.395 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was $18,192 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $6,927 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $7,384 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $4,668 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

City Developments's current Net Income (TTM) was 488. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

City Developments's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -1,171. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=487.862/18962.446
=0.0257278

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=149.079/18192.344
=0.0081946

City Developments's return on assets of this year was 0.0257278. City Developments's return on assets of last year was 0.0081946. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

City Developments's current Net Income (TTM) was 488. City Developments's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -1,171. ==> -1,171 <= 488 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=8399.094/19959.6685
=0.42080328

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=6927.198/18577.395
=0.37288317

City Developments's gearing of this year was 0.42080328. City Developments's gearing of last year was 0.37288317. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=8583.737/3847.349
=2.23107833

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=7384.185/4668.058
=1.58185374

City Developments's current ratio of this year was 2.23107833. City Developments's current ratio of last year was 1.58185374. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

City Developments's number of shares in issue this year was 893.402. City Developments's number of shares in issue last year was 896.873. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1133.611/2779.183
=0.40789361

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1082.596/2422.391
=0.44691216

City Developments's gross margin of this year was 0.40789361. City Developments's gross margin of last year was 0.44691216. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=2779.183/18962.446
=0.14656247

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=2422.391/18192.344
=0.13315442

City Developments's asset turnover of this year was 0.14656247. City Developments's asset turnover of last year was 0.13315442. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+1+0+0+1+1+0+1
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

City Developments has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
City Developments (CDEVF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on City Developments and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, City Developments' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, City Developments ranks #685 out of 1756 companies in the Real Estate industry, placing it in the top 39%.
Is City Developments' Piotroski F-Score too high?
City Developments' current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 7.00. The Real Estate industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. City Developments' value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, City Developments ranks #685 out of 1756 companies in the Real Estate industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, City Developments has a GF Score™ of 67/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does City Developments' Piotroski F-Score compare to competitors?
According to the Real Estate industry distribution chart, City Developments ranks #685 out of 1756 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts City Developments in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. City Developments' value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, City Developments' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, City Developments has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Real Estate company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Real Estate companies is 5.00, based on 1,756 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. City Developments's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on City Developments and its competitors. For the Real Estate industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. City Developments's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is City Developments stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, City Developments (CDEVF) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $4.55, compared to a current price of $6.49 — trading 42.6% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Real Estate industry median of 5.00. City Developments' overall GF Score™ is 67/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For City Developments (CDEVF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is City Developments (CDEVF) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, City Developments stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of $6.49 is trading 42.6% above its estimated GF Value™ of $4.55. GuruFocus considers City Developments to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for CDEVF:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: $4.55 vs. price of $6.49 (42.6% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 67/100 with 7 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Real Estate median (#685 of 1756)

No single metric tells the full story. See the CDEVF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


City Developments Business Description

Address 9 Raffles Place, No. 12-01 Republic Plaza, Singapore, SGP, 048619
City Developments Ltd operates as a property developer and owner, and investment holding company. Along with its subsidiaries, its principal activities are those of property developers and owners, hotel owners and operators, a club operator and owner, investment in properties and in shares, property management, project management, and provision of consultancy, procurement, and laundry services. The company's reportable segments are; Property development, Hotel operations, and Investment properties. The majority of the revenue is generated from its Property development segment which develops and purchases properties for sale. Key revenue for the company is generated from its operations in Singapore and the rest from Japan, China, the United States, United Kingdom, and other regions.
67GF Score

Get the complete analysis for CDEVF

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$6.49
Price
$4.55
GF Value