Vp (CHIX:VPL) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 26, 2026) — 33% Below Median


CHIX:VPL Vp PLC CHIX:VPL
63 GF Score
Price £4.81
GF Value £5.55
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 6 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Vp Piotroski F-Score?

Vp CHIX:VPL +0.42% 63 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026, which is 33% below its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates CHIX:VPL with a GF Score™ of 63/100 and a GF Value™ of £5.55 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,063 Business Services companies, Vp ranks worse than 69.52% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Vp has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Vp's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

CHIX:VPl' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 8
Current: 4

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Vp was 8. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.

Vp  (CHIX:VPl) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Vp Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Vp Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Vp's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Vp Piotroski F-Score Chart

Vp Annual Data
Trend Mar17 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 8.00 7.00 4.00 8.00 4.00

Vp Semi-Annual Data
Sep16 Mar17 Sep17 Mar18 Sep18 Mar19 Sep19 Mar20 Sep20 Mar21 Sep21 Mar22 Sep22 Mar23 Sep23 Mar24 Sep24 Mar25 Sep25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 4.00

CHIX:VPL vs URI, SUNB, AER: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Rental & Leasing Services subindustry, Vp's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Vp Piotroski F-Score vs Business Services Industry

For the Business Services industry and Industrials sector, Vp's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Vp's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


CHIX:VPL
63GF Score
Vp PLC CHIX:VPL
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was £-5.4 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was £61.4 Mil.
Revenue was £358.3 Mil.
Gross Profit was £82.2 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was (472.419 + 453.259) / 2 = £462.839 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was £472.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was £137.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was £106.8 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was £164.6 Mil.
Net Income was £14.4 Mil.

Revenue was £380.0 Mil.
Gross Profit was £92.1 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was (439.958 + 472.419) / 2 = £456.1885 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was £440.0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was £199.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was £113.3 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was £100.7 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Vp's current Net Income (TTM) was -5.4. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Vp's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 61.4. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-5.431/472.419
=-0.01149615

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=14.445/439.958
=0.03283268

Vp's return on assets of this year was -0.01149615. Vp's return on assets of last year was 0.03283268. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Vp's current Net Income (TTM) was -5.4. Vp's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 61.4. ==> 61.4 > -5.4 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=136.953/462.839
=0.29589771

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=198.98/456.1885
=0.43617934

Vp's gearing of this year was 0.29589771. Vp's gearing of last year was 0.43617934. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=106.796/164.616
=0.64875832

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=113.273/100.708
=1.12476665

Vp's current ratio of this year was 0.64875832. Vp's current ratio of last year was 1.12476665. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Vp's number of shares in issue this year was 39.51. Vp's number of shares in issue last year was 39.594. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=82.205/358.275
=0.22944665

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=92.118/379.957
=0.24244322

Vp's gross margin of this year was 0.22944665. Vp's gross margin of last year was 0.24244322. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=358.275/472.419
=0.75838398

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=379.957/439.958
=0.86362107

Vp's asset turnover of this year was 0.75838398. Vp's asset turnover of last year was 0.86362107. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Vp has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Vp (CHIX:VPL) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Vp and its competitors. This is 33% below median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Vp's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Vp ranks #739 out of 1063 companies in the Business Services industry, placing it in the top 69.5%.
Is Vp's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Vp's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 33% below median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 8.00. The Business Services industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Vp's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Vp ranks #739 out of 1063 companies in the Business Services industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Vp has a GF Score™ of 63/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Vp's Piotroski F-Score compare to URI and SUNB?
According to the Business Services industry distribution chart, Vp ranks #739 out of 1063 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Vp in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Vp's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Vp's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Vp has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Business Services company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Business Services companies is 5.00, based on 1,063 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Vp's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Vp and its competitors. For the Business Services industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Vp's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 33% below median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Vp stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Vp (CHIX:VPL) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is £5.55, compared to a current price of £4.81 — trading 13.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 33% below median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 20% below the Business Services industry median of 5.00. Vp's overall GF Score™ is 63/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Vp (CHIX:VPL), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Vp (CHIX:VPL) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Vp stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of £4.81 is trading 13.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of £5.55. GuruFocus considers Vp to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for CHIX:VPL:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (33% below median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: £5.55 vs. price of £4.81 (13.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 63/100 with 6 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Business Services median (#739 of 1063)

No single metric tells the full story. See the CHIX:VPL stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Vp Business Description

Other Exchanges VP.:UK
Address Otley Road, Central House, Beckwith Knowle, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, GBR, HG3 1UD
Vp PLC provides the rental and sale of equipment and related services. The company operates under the divisions such as UK Forks, Groundforce, Airpac Bukom Oilfield Services, Hire Station, Torrent Trackside, TPA, and TR Group. It serves infrastructure, construction, housebuilding, and energy. The company's reportable segments are the two units, the United Kingdom which is the key revenue driver, and International.
63GF Score

Get the complete analysis for CHIX:VPL

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

£4.81
Price
£5.55
GF Value