CVGRF (City View Green Holdings) Piotroski F-Score: 2 (As of Jun. 30, 2026) — 33% Below Median


What is City View Green Holdings Piotroski F-Score?

City View Green Holdings CVGRF -25.79% Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 30, 2026, which is 33% below its 10-year median of 3.00. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 978 Drug Manufacturers companies, City View Green Holdings ranks worse than 91.31% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

City View Green Holdings has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for City View Green Holdings's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

CVGRF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 3   Max: 6
Current: 2

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of City View Green Holdings was 6. The lowest was 1. And the median was 3.

City View Green Holdings  (OTCPK:CVGRF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


City View Green Holdings Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


City View Green Holdings Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for City View Green Holdings's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

City View Green Holdings Piotroski F-Score Chart

City View Green Holdings Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 3.00

City View Green Holdings Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00

CVGRF vs ZTS, UTHR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic subindustry, City View Green Holdings's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


City View Green Holdings Piotroski F-Score vs Drug Manufacturers Industry

For the Drug Manufacturers industry and Healthcare sector, City View Green Holdings's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where City View Green Holdings's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.05 + -0.32 + -0.115 + -0.047 = $-0.53 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.102 + -0.012 + -0.176 + -0.009 = $-0.30 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(0.017 + 0.022 + 0.02 + 0.054 + 0.05) / 5 = $0.0326 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $0.02 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.01 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1.31 Mil.
Net Income was -0.178 + -0.08 + -0.019 + -0.277 = $-0.55 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(0.052 + 0.026 + 0.001 + 0.103 + 0.017) / 5 = $0.0398 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $0.05 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.02 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1.13 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

City View Green Holdings's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.53. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

City View Green Holdings's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.30. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-0.532/0.017
=-31.29411765

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-0.554/0.052
=-10.65384615

City View Green Holdings's return on assets of this year was -31.29411765. City View Green Holdings's return on assets of last year was -10.65384615. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

City View Green Holdings's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.53. City View Green Holdings's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.30. ==> -0.30 > -0.53 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0/0.0326
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0/0.0398
=0

City View Green Holdings's gearing of this year was 0. City View Green Holdings's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.005/1.305
=0.00383142

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.017/1.128
=0.01507092

City View Green Holdings's current ratio of this year was 0.00383142. City View Green Holdings's current ratio of last year was 0.01507092. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

City View Green Holdings's number of shares in issue this year was 49.827. City View Green Holdings's number of shares in issue last year was 45.765. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

City View Green Holdings's gross margin of this year was . City View Green Holdings's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=0/0.017
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=0/0.052
=0

City View Green Holdings's asset turnover of this year was 0. City View Green Holdings's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+0+0+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

City View Green Holdings has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 2 mean?
City View Green Holdings (CVGRF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 as of Jun. 30, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on City View Green Holdings and its competitors. This is 33% below median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, City View Green Holdings' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, City View Green Holdings ranks #893 out of 978 companies in the Drug Manufacturers industry, placing it in the top 91.3%.
Is City View Green Holdings' Piotroski F-Score too high?
City View Green Holdings' current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 6.00. The Drug Manufacturers industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. City View Green Holdings' value of 2 is 60% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, City View Green Holdings ranks #893 out of 978 companies in the Drug Manufacturers industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers.
How does City View Green Holdings' Piotroski F-Score compare to ZTS and UTHR?
According to the Drug Manufacturers industry distribution chart, City View Green Holdings ranks #893 out of 978 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places City View Green Holdings in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. City View Green Holdings' value of 2 is 60% below this benchmark. Historically, City View Green Holdings' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, City View Green Holdings has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Drug Manufacturers company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Drug Manufacturers companies is 5.00, based on 978 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. City View Green Holdings's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 60% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on City View Green Holdings and its competitors. For the Drug Manufacturers industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. City View Green Holdings's current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 33% below median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is City View Green Holdings stock overvalued right now?
City View Green Holdings (CVGRF) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 2. The current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 60% below the Drug Manufacturers industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For City View Green Holdings (CVGRF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 30, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

City View Green Holdings Business Description

Other Exchanges CVY0:GermanyCVGR:Canada
Address 345 Danforth Avenue, Suite 132, Toronto, ON, CAN, M4K 1N7
City View Green Holdings Inc is a cannabis company focused on the cultivation, extraction, and production of cannabis products for the medicinal and adult-use markets in Canada. The company operates a facility in Brantford, Ontario, with cultivation and extraction capabilities.