FOCL (Edap TMS) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jun. 24, 2026) — 25% Below Median


FOCL Edap TMS SA FOCL
53 GF Score
Price $5.08
GF Value $4.52
Valuation Modestly Overvalued
! 7 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Edap TMS Piotroski F-Score?

Edap TMS FOCL +1.91% 53 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 24, 2026, which is 25% below its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates FOCL with a GF Score™ of 53/100 and a GF Value™ of $4.52 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 114 Medical Distribution companies, Edap TMS ranks worse than 81.58% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Edap TMS has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Edap TMS's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

FOCL' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 7
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Edap TMS was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Edap TMS  (NAS:FOCL) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Edap TMS Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Edap TMS Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Edap TMS's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Edap TMS Piotroski F-Score Chart

Edap TMS Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00

Edap TMS Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00

FOCL vs ACH, YI, COSM: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Medical Distribution subindustry, Edap TMS's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Edap TMS Piotroski F-Score vs Medical Distribution Industry

For the Medical Distribution industry and Healthcare sector, Edap TMS's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Edap TMS's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


FOCL
53GF Score
Edap TMS SA FOCL
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -6.567 + -5.882 + -22.41 + -9.083 = $-43.9 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -5.439 + -3.851 + -1.777 + -2.972 = $-14.0 Mil.
Revenue was 18.813 + 16.281 + 51.606 + 17.813 = $104.5 Mil.
Gross Profit was 8 + 7.006 + 21.861 + 8.146 = $45.0 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(81.149 + 80.141 + 72.103 + 78.997 + 72.059) / 5 = $76.8898 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $81.1 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $19.9 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $50.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $37.5 Mil.
Net Income was -6.573 + -7.147 + -12.715 + -7.444 = $-33.9 Mil.

Revenue was 16.926 + 14.63 + 53.289 + 14.268 = $99.1 Mil.
Gross Profit was 6.345 + 5.756 + 22.406 + 5.993 = $40.5 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(96.196 + 88.075 + 88.283 + 89.407 + 81.149) / 5 = $88.622 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $96.2 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $3.7 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $63.3 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $36.3 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Edap TMS's current Net Income (TTM) was -43.9. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Edap TMS's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -14.0. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-43.942/81.149
=-0.54149774

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-33.879/96.196
=-0.3521872

Edap TMS's return on assets of this year was -0.54149774. Edap TMS's return on assets of last year was -0.3521872. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Edap TMS's current Net Income (TTM) was -43.9. Edap TMS's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -14.0. ==> -14.0 > -43.9 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=19.949/76.8898
=0.25944924

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=3.67/88.622
=0.04141184

Edap TMS's gearing of this year was 0.25944924. Edap TMS's gearing of last year was 0.04141184. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=50.364/37.508
=1.34275355

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=63.284/36.316
=1.7425928

Edap TMS's current ratio of this year was 1.34275355. Edap TMS's current ratio of last year was 1.7425928. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Edap TMS's number of shares in issue this year was 37.482. Edap TMS's number of shares in issue last year was 37.392. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=45.013/104.513
=0.43069283

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=40.5/99.113
=0.4086245

Edap TMS's gross margin of this year was 0.43069283. Edap TMS's gross margin of last year was 0.4086245. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=104.513/81.149
=1.28791482

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=99.113/96.196
=1.03032351

Edap TMS's asset turnover of this year was 1.28791482. Edap TMS's asset turnover of last year was 1.03032351. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+0+0+1+1
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Edap TMS has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Edap TMS (FOCL) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Edap TMS and its competitors. This is 25% below median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Edap TMS's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Edap TMS ranks #93 out of 114 companies in the Medical Distribution industry, placing it in the top 81.6%.
Is Edap TMS's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Edap TMS's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 25% below median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 7.00. The Medical Distribution industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Edap TMS's value of 3 is 40% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Edap TMS ranks #93 out of 114 companies in the Medical Distribution industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Edap TMS has a GF Score™ of 53/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Edap TMS's Piotroski F-Score compare to ACH and YI?
According to the Medical Distribution industry distribution chart, Edap TMS ranks #93 out of 114 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Edap TMS in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Edap TMS's value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Edap TMS's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Edap TMS has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Medical Distribution company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Medical Distribution companies is 5.00, based on 114 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Edap TMS's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Edap TMS and its competitors. For the Medical Distribution industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Edap TMS's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 25% below median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Edap TMS stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Edap TMS (FOCL) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $4.52, compared to a current price of $5.08 — trading 12.3% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 25% below median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 40% below the Medical Distribution industry median of 5.00. Edap TMS's overall GF Score™ is 53/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Edap TMS (FOCL), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Edap TMS (FOCL) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Edap TMS stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of $5.08 is trading 12.3% above its estimated GF Value™ of $4.52. GuruFocus considers Edap TMS to be Modestly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for FOCL:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 3 (25% below median its 10-year median of 4.00)
  • GF Value™: $4.52 vs. price of $5.08 (12.3% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 53/100 with 7 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% below the Medical Distribution median (#93 of 114)

No single metric tells the full story. See the FOCL stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Edap TMS Business Description

Other Exchanges EDA:Germany
Address Parc d\'Activites La Poudrette-Lamartine, 4/6, rue du Dauphine, Vaulx-en-Velin, FRA, 69120
Edap TMS SA, formerly known as FocalTherics, operates in the Robotic Focal Therapy industry. It develops, manufactures, and markets minimally invasive medical devices across various countries to treat various conditions using proprietary focused ultrasound technology. The company's flagship platform, Focal One Robotic HIFU, combines imaging, real-time treatment planning, robotic precision, and high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) technology. It is focused on expanding the clinical adoption of its patented focused ultrasound-based robotic therapy platforms through continued innovation, clinical evidence generation, physician education, and various market development initiatives.
53GF Score

Get the complete analysis for FOCL

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$5.08
Price
$4.52
GF Value