Richmond Minerals (FRA:R520) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 100% Above Median


FRA:R520 Richmond Minerals Inc FRA:R520
31 GF Score
Price €0.07
View Full Analysis

What is Richmond Minerals Piotroski F-Score?

Richmond Minerals FRA:R520 +44.90% 31 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 100% above its 10-year median of 3.00. GuruFocus rates FRA:R520 with a GF Score™ of 31/100. Among 2,512 Metals & Mining companies, Richmond Minerals ranks better than 91.4% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Richmond Minerals has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Richmond Minerals's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

FRA:R520' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 6
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Richmond Minerals was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.

Richmond Minerals  (FRA:R520) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Richmond Minerals Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Richmond Minerals Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Richmond Minerals's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Richmond Minerals Piotroski F-Score Chart

Richmond Minerals Annual Data
Trend May16 May17 May18 May19 May20 May21 May22 May23 May24 May25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00

Richmond Minerals Quarterly Data
May21 Aug21 Nov21 Feb22 May22 Aug22 Nov22 Feb23 May23 Aug23 Nov23 Feb24 May24 Aug24 Nov24 Feb25 May25 Aug25 Nov25 Feb26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 6.00

FRA:R520 vs HL: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Other Precious Metals & Mining subindustry, Richmond Minerals's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Richmond Minerals Piotroski F-Score vs Metals & Mining Industry

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Richmond Minerals's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Richmond Minerals's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


FRA:R520
31GF Score
Richmond Minerals Inc FRA:R520
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Feb26) TTM:Last Year (Feb25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.029 + 0.064 + 0.057 + 0.07 = €0.16 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.015 + -0.001 + -0.026 + 0.086 = €0.04 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = €0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = €0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Feb25)
to the end of this year (Feb26) was
(1.611 + 1.497 + 1.56 + 1.58 + 1.985) / 5 = €1.6466 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Feb25) was €1.61 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €0.35 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €0.55 Mil.
Net Income was -0.798 + -0.039 + -0.029 + -0.007 = €-0.87 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = €0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = €0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Feb24)
to the end of last year (Feb25) was
(2.549 + 1.901 + 1.615 + 1.6 + 1.611) / 5 = €1.8552 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Feb24) was €2.55 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €0.11 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €0.23 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Richmond Minerals's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.16. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Richmond Minerals's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.04. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Feb25)
=0.162/1.611
=0.10055866

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Feb24)
=-0.873/2.549
=-0.34248725

Richmond Minerals's return on assets of this year was 0.10055866. Richmond Minerals's return on assets of last year was -0.34248725. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Richmond Minerals's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.16. Richmond Minerals's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.04. ==> 0.04 <= 0.16 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Feb26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Feb25 to Feb26
=0/1.6466
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Feb25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Feb24 to Feb25
=0/1.8552
=0

Richmond Minerals's gearing of this year was 0. Richmond Minerals's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Feb26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.353/0.549
=0.64298725

Current Ratio (Last Year: Feb25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.113/0.232
=0.48706897

Richmond Minerals's current ratio of this year was 0.64298725. Richmond Minerals's current ratio of last year was 0.48706897. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Richmond Minerals's number of shares in issue this year was 36.213. Richmond Minerals's number of shares in issue last year was 36.213. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Richmond Minerals's gross margin of this year was . Richmond Minerals's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Feb25)
=0/1.611
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Feb24)
=0/2.549
=0

Richmond Minerals's asset turnover of this year was 0. Richmond Minerals's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+0+1+1+1+0+0
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Richmond Minerals has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
Richmond Minerals (FRA:R520) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Richmond Minerals and its competitors. This is 100% above median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Richmond Minerals' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Richmond Minerals ranks #216 out of 2512 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, placing it in the top 8.6%.
Is Richmond Minerals' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Richmond Minerals' current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 100% above median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 6.00. The Metals & Mining industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Richmond Minerals' value of 6 is 100% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Richmond Minerals ranks #216 out of 2512 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Richmond Minerals has a GF Score™ of 31/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Richmond Minerals' Piotroski F-Score compare to HL?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Richmond Minerals ranks #216 out of 2512 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Richmond Minerals in the top 9% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Richmond Minerals' value of 6 is 100% above this benchmark. Historically, Richmond Minerals' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 3.00, Richmond Minerals has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Metals & Mining companies is 3.00, based on 2,512 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Richmond Minerals's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 100% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Richmond Minerals and its competitors. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Richmond Minerals's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 100% above median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Richmond Minerals stock overvalued right now?
Richmond Minerals (FRA:R520) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 6. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 100% above median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 100% above the Metals & Mining industry median of 3.00. Richmond Minerals' overall GF Score™ is 31/100. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Richmond Minerals (FRA:R520), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Richmond Minerals Business Description

Other Exchanges RMDFF:USARMD:Canada
Address 50 Melham Court, Toronto, ON, CAN, M1B 2E5
Richmond Minerals Inc is engaged in base and precious metal mining and related activities, including exploration and development in Northern Ontario. The company is in the process of exploring its mineral properties and has not yet determined whether these properties contain ore reserves that are economically recoverable. Its property consists of the Ridley Lake Gold Project. It operates in one industry segment, Junior exploration and evaluation, and geographically in one country, Canada.
31GF Score

Get the complete analysis for FRA:R520

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

€0.07
Price