Frontier Nuclear and MineralsFRA:WF71 36 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 29, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 3.00. GuruFocus rates FRA:WF71 with a GF Score™ of 36/100. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 2,508 Metals & Mining companies, Frontier Nuclear and Minerals ranks better than 58.85% on this metric.
Warning Sign:
Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
The historical rank and industry rank for Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
FRA:WF71'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2 Med: 3 Max: 4
Current: 3
During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Frontier Nuclear and Minerals was 4. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals (FRA:WF71) Piotroski F-Score Explanation
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Piotroski F-Score Chart
FRA:WF71 vs OMEX, RNGE, WWR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Piotroski F-Score vs Metals & Mining Industry
For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's current Net Income (TTM) was -10.14.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -5.96.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 3. Change in Return on Assets
Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's return on assets of this year was -0.50002466. Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's return on assets of last year was -0.25302386.
==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's gearing of this year was 0. Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's gearing of last year was 0.
==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's current ratio of this year was 3.18550203. Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's current ratio of last year was 1.68617021.
==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's number of shares in issue this year was 4.973. Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's number of shares in issue last year was 1.557.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's gross margin of this year was . Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's gross margin of last year was .
==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's asset turnover of this year was 0. Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's asset turnover of last year was 0.
==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
0
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
0
=
3
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals (FRA:WF71) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jun. 29, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Frontier Nuclear and Minerals and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Frontier Nuclear and Minerals' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 4.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Frontier Nuclear and Minerals ranks #1032 out of 2508 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, placing it in the top 41.1%.
Is Frontier Nuclear and Minerals' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals' current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is near median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 4.00. The Metals & Mining industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Frontier Nuclear and Minerals' value of 3 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Frontier Nuclear and Minerals ranks #1032 out of 2508 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Frontier Nuclear and Minerals has a GF Score™ of 36/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Frontier Nuclear and Minerals' Piotroski F-Score compare to OMEX and RNGE?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Frontier Nuclear and Minerals ranks #1032 out of 2508 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Frontier Nuclear and Minerals in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Frontier Nuclear and Minerals' value of 3 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Frontier Nuclear and Minerals' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 4.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 3.00, Frontier Nuclear and Minerals has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Metals & Mining companies is 3.00, based on 2,508 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Frontier Nuclear and Minerals and its competitors. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Frontier Nuclear and Minerals's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Frontier Nuclear and Minerals stock overvalued right now?
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals (FRA:WF71) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 3. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 0% at the Metals & Mining industry median of 3.00. Frontier Nuclear and Minerals' overall GF Score™ is 36/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Frontier Nuclear and Minerals (FRA:WF71), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 29, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Business Description
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc is developing a U.S.-focused front-end nuclear fuel cycle company through a portfolio of U.S. uranium exploration and development projects in Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah, together with investments in next-generation uranium enrichment and small modular reactors. Frontier Nuclear is actively evaluating value-accretive investment opportunities in other sectors of the domestic U.S. nuclear fuel cycle. The group is developing a portfolio of critical minerals projects in America, Canada, and Namibia, including uranium, tantalum, cesium, and lithium. Its projects are Engo Valley, Pine Ridge, Shatford Lake, Snow Lake Lithium, and Tallahassee.
36GF Score
Get the complete analysis for FRA:WF71
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
FRA:WF71 has been successfully added to your 
