GFELF (Goodfellow) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — Near Median


GFELF Goodfellow Inc GFELF
68 GF Score
Price $8.40
GF Value $8.64
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 4 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Goodfellow Piotroski F-Score?

Goodfellow GFELF 68 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates GFELF with a GF Score™ of 68/100 and a GF Value™ of $8.64 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 282 Forest Products companies, Goodfellow ranks better than 80.5% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Goodfellow has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Goodfellow's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

GFELF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 6   Max: 9
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Goodfellow was 9. The lowest was 2. And the median was 6.

Goodfellow  (OTCPK:GFELF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Goodfellow Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Goodfellow Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Goodfellow's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Goodfellow Piotroski F-Score Chart

Goodfellow Annual Data
Trend Nov16 Nov17 Nov18 Nov19 Nov20 Nov21 Nov22 Nov23 Nov24 Nov25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 8.00 4.00 6.00 3.00 3.00

Goodfellow Quarterly Data
May21 Aug21 Nov21 Feb22 May22 Aug22 Nov22 Feb23 May23 Aug23 Nov23 Feb24 May24 Aug24 Nov24 Feb25 May25 Aug25 Nov25 Feb26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 6.00 3.00 6.00

GFELF vs SSD, UFPI, BCC: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Lumber & Wood Production subindustry, Goodfellow's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Goodfellow Piotroski F-Score vs Forest Products Industry

For the Forest Products industry and Basic Materials sector, Goodfellow's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Goodfellow's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


GFELF
68GF Score
Goodfellow Inc GFELF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Feb26) TTM:Last Year (Feb25) TTM:
Net Income was 1.774 + 2.713 + 2.276 + -2.295 = $4.5 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -7.676 + 28.015 + 7.089 + -17.622 = $9.8 Mil.
Revenue was 110.291 + 102.856 + 97.434 + 79.667 = $390.2 Mil.
Gross Profit was 23.616 + 25.527 + 303.076 + 13.551 = $365.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Feb25)
to the end of this year (Feb26) was
(232.824 + 251.612 + 224.998 + 209.816 + 239.223) / 5 = $231.6946 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Feb25) was $232.8 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $10.1 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $177.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $76.8 Mil.
Net Income was 3.885 + 4.211 + 1.73 + -1.581 = $8.2 Mil.

Revenue was 102.681 + 102.283 + 88.889 + 77.754 = $371.6 Mil.
Gross Profit was 24.976 + 25.183 + 285.734 + 13.623 = $349.5 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Feb24)
to the end of last year (Feb25) was
(200.193 + 221.509 + 216.764 + 208.871 + 232.824) / 5 = $216.0322 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Feb24) was $200.2 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $11.2 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $171.1 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $75.0 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Goodfellow's current Net Income (TTM) was 4.5. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Goodfellow's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 9.8. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Feb25)
=4.468/232.824
=0.01919046

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Feb24)
=8.245/200.193
=0.04118526

Goodfellow's return on assets of this year was 0.01919046. Goodfellow's return on assets of last year was 0.04118526. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Goodfellow's current Net Income (TTM) was 4.5. Goodfellow's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 9.8. ==> 9.8 > 4.5 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Feb26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Feb25 to Feb26
=10.067/231.6946
=0.04344944

Gearing (Last Year: Feb25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Feb24 to Feb25
=11.179/216.0322
=0.05174692

Goodfellow's gearing of this year was 0.04344944. Goodfellow's gearing of last year was 0.05174692. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Feb26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=177.384/76.801
=2.30965743

Current Ratio (Last Year: Feb25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=171.113/74.984
=2.28199349

Goodfellow's current ratio of this year was 2.30965743. Goodfellow's current ratio of last year was 2.28199349. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Goodfellow's number of shares in issue this year was 8.432. Goodfellow's number of shares in issue last year was 8.424. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=365.77/390.248
=0.93727578

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=349.516/371.607
=0.94055279

Goodfellow's gross margin of this year was 0.93727578. Goodfellow's gross margin of last year was 0.94055279. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Feb25)
=390.248/232.824
=1.67615023

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Feb24)
=371.607/200.193
=1.85624372

Goodfellow's asset turnover of this year was 1.67615023. Goodfellow's asset turnover of last year was 1.85624372. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+1+0+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Goodfellow has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
Goodfellow (GFELF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Goodfellow and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Goodfellow's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 9.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Goodfellow ranks #55 out of 282 companies in the Forest Products industry, placing it in the top 19.5%.
Is Goodfellow's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Goodfellow's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is near median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 9.00. The Forest Products industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Goodfellow's value of 6 is 20% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Goodfellow ranks #55 out of 282 companies in the Forest Products industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Goodfellow has a GF Score™ of 68/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Goodfellow's Piotroski F-Score compare to SSD and UFPI?
According to the Forest Products industry distribution chart, Goodfellow ranks #55 out of 282 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Goodfellow in the top 20% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Goodfellow's value of 6 is 20% above this benchmark. Historically, Goodfellow's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 9.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Goodfellow has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Forest Products company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Forest Products companies is 5.00, based on 282 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Goodfellow's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Goodfellow and its competitors. For the Forest Products industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Goodfellow's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is near median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Goodfellow stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Goodfellow (GFELF) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is $8.64, compared to a current price of $8.40 — trading 2.8% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is near median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 20% above the Forest Products industry median of 5.00. Goodfellow's overall GF Score™ is 68/100 with 4 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Goodfellow (GFELF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Goodfellow (GFELF) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Goodfellow stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $8.40 is trading 2.8% below its estimated GF Value™ of $8.64. GuruFocus considers Goodfellow to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for GFELF:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 6 (near median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: $8.64 vs. price of $8.40 (2.8% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 68/100 with 4 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% above the Forest Products median (#55 of 282)

No single metric tells the full story. See the GFELF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Goodfellow Business Description

Other Exchanges GDL:Canada
Address 225 Goodfellow Street, Delson, QC, CAN, J5B 1V5
Goodfellow Inc is engaged in various business activities related to the remanufacturing and distribution of lumber and wood products. The company manages its operations under one operating segment i.e. sale of Lumber, Specialty and commodity panels, Flooring, and Building materials. The majority of the company's revenue is generated from the sale of Lumber. The company operates in Canada and the United States; the majority of its revenue is generated from Canada.
68GF Score

Get the complete analysis for GFELF

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$8.40
Price
$8.64
GF Value