GMUAF (Gamuda Bhd) Piotroski F-Score: 2 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 50% Below Median


GMUAF Gamuda Bhd GMUAF
87 GF Score
Price $0.41
GF Value $0.48
! 8 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Gamuda Bhd Piotroski F-Score?

Gamuda Bhd GMUAF 87 Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 50% below its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates GMUAF with a GF Score™ of 87/100 and a GF Value™ of $0.48. The stock has 8 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,735 Construction companies, Gamuda Bhd ranks worse than 92.97% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Gamuda Bhd has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Gamuda Bhd's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

GMUAF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 7
Current: 2

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Gamuda Bhd was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Gamuda Bhd  (OTCPK:GMUAF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Gamuda Bhd Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Gamuda Bhd Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Gamuda Bhd's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Gamuda Bhd Piotroski F-Score Chart

Gamuda Bhd Annual Data
Trend Jul16 Jul17 Jul18 Jul19 Jul20 Jul21 Jul22 Jul23 Jul24 Jul25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00

Gamuda Bhd Quarterly Data
Jul21 Oct21 Jan22 Apr22 Jul22 Oct22 Jan23 Apr23 Jul23 Oct23 Jan24 Apr24 Jul24 Oct24 Jan25 Apr25 Jul25 Oct25 Jan26 Apr26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

GMUAF vs PWR, FIX, EME: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Engineering & Construction subindustry, Gamuda Bhd's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Gamuda Bhd Piotroski F-Score vs Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, Gamuda Bhd's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Gamuda Bhd's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


GMUAF
87GF Score
Gamuda Bhd GMUAF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Apr26) TTM:Last Year (Apr25) TTM:
Net Income was 78.436 + 51.055 + 57.055 + 64.917 = $251 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -79.737 + 60.548 + -71.626 + 11.589 = $-79 Mil.
Revenue was 1143.529 + 911.317 + 1069.074 + 1116.099 = $4,240 Mil.
Gross Profit was 1143.529 + 911.317 + 1069.074 + 1116.099 = $4,240 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Apr25)
to the end of this year (Apr26) was
(6574.283 + 7148.033 + 7546.907 + 8070.895 + 8741.459) / 5 = $7616.3154 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Apr25) was $6,574 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $2,225 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $5,443 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $3,138 Mil.
Net Income was 58.28 + 47.787 + 49.047 + 55.964 = $211 Mil.

Revenue was 1009.749 + 962.308 + 874.528 + 700.487 = $3,547 Mil.
Gross Profit was 1009.749 + 962.308 + 874.528 + 700.487 = $3,547 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Apr24)
to the end of last year (Apr25) was
(5383.979 + 5701.463 + 6308.307 + 6297.96 + 6574.283) / 5 = $6053.1984 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Apr24) was $5,384 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1,842 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $4,183 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,810 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Gamuda Bhd's current Net Income (TTM) was 251. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Gamuda Bhd's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -79. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Apr25)
=251.463/6574.283
=0.03824949

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Apr24)
=211.078/5383.979
=0.03920483

Gamuda Bhd's return on assets of this year was 0.03824949. Gamuda Bhd's return on assets of last year was 0.03920483. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Gamuda Bhd's current Net Income (TTM) was 251. Gamuda Bhd's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -79. ==> -79 <= 251 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Apr26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Apr25 to Apr26
=2224.945/7616.3154
=0.29212879

Gearing (Last Year: Apr25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Apr24 to Apr25
=1841.529/6053.1984
=0.30422413

Gamuda Bhd's gearing of this year was 0.29212879. Gamuda Bhd's gearing of last year was 0.30422413. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Apr26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=5443.101/3137.988
=1.73458312

Current Ratio (Last Year: Apr25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4182.795/1810.211
=2.3106671

Gamuda Bhd's current ratio of this year was 1.73458312. Gamuda Bhd's current ratio of last year was 2.3106671. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Gamuda Bhd's number of shares in issue this year was 6054.694. Gamuda Bhd's number of shares in issue last year was 5905.167. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=4240.019/4240.019
=1

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3547.072/3547.072
=1

Gamuda Bhd's gross margin of this year was 1. Gamuda Bhd's gross margin of last year was 1. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Apr25)
=4240.019/6574.283
=0.64494014

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Apr24)
=3547.072/5383.979
=0.65881981

Gamuda Bhd's asset turnover of this year was 0.64494014. Gamuda Bhd's asset turnover of last year was 0.65881981. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+1+0+0+0+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Gamuda Bhd has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 2 mean?
Gamuda Bhd (GMUAF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Gamuda Bhd and its competitors. This is 50% below median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Gamuda Bhd's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Gamuda Bhd ranks #1613 out of 1735 companies in the Construction industry, placing it in the top 93%.
Is Gamuda Bhd's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Gamuda Bhd's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 50% below median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 7.00. The Construction industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Gamuda Bhd's value of 2 is 60% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Gamuda Bhd ranks #1613 out of 1735 companies in the Construction industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Gamuda Bhd has a GF Score™ of 87/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Gamuda Bhd's Piotroski F-Score compare to PWR and FIX?
According to the Construction industry distribution chart, Gamuda Bhd ranks #1613 out of 1735 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Gamuda Bhd in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Gamuda Bhd's value of 2 is 60% below this benchmark. Historically, Gamuda Bhd's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Gamuda Bhd has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Construction company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Construction companies is 5.00, based on 1,735 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Gamuda Bhd's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 60% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Gamuda Bhd and its competitors. For the Construction industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Gamuda Bhd's current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 50% below median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Gamuda Bhd stock overvalued right now?
Gamuda Bhd (GMUAF) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 2. The stock's GF Value™ is $0.48, compared to a current price of $0.41 — trading 14.9% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 50% below median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 60% below the Construction industry median of 5.00. Gamuda Bhd's overall GF Score™ is 87/100 with 8 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Gamuda Bhd (GMUAF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Gamuda Bhd (GMUAF) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Gamuda Bhd stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $0.41 is trading 14.9% below its estimated GF Value™ of $0.48.

Key valuation signals for GMUAF:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 2 (50% below median its 10-year median of 4.00)
  • GF Value™: $0.48 vs. price of $0.41 (14.9% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 87/100 with 8 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 60% below the Construction median (#1613 of 1735)

No single metric tells the full story. See the GMUAF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Gamuda Bhd Business Description

Other Exchanges 5398:Malaysia
Address No. 8, Jalan PJU8/8A, Menara Gamuda, D-16-01, Block D, PJ Trade Centre, Bandar Damansara Perdana, Petaling Jaya, SGR, MYS, 47820
Gamuda Bhd is principally into investment holding and civil engineering construction. The company's business activities include: Engineering and Construction, Property Development, Renewable Energy, and Technology and Digitalisation. Its reportable segments are: (i) Engineering and construction-the construction of highways and bridges, airfield facilities, railway, tunnel, water treatment plants, dams, general and trading services related to construction activities and the management of water supply; and (ii) Property development and club operations - the development of residential and commercial properties and club operations. The majority of the revenue is generated from the Engineering and Construction segment.
87GF Score

Get the complete analysis for GMUAF

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$0.41
Price
$0.48
GF Value