GSM (Ferroglobe) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — Near Median


GSM Ferroglobe PLC GSM
71 GF Score
Price $3.58
GF Value $4.13
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Ferroglobe Piotroski F-Score?

Ferroglobe GSM -2.72% 71 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates GSM with a GF Score™ of 71/100 and a GF Value™ of $4.13 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,510 Metals & Mining companies, Ferroglobe ranks better than 86.02% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ferroglobe has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Ferroglobe's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

GSM' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Ferroglobe was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

Ferroglobe  (NAS:GSM) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Ferroglobe Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Ferroglobe Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Ferroglobe's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Ferroglobe Piotroski F-Score Chart

Ferroglobe Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 3.00

Ferroglobe Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00

GSM vs NB, TMCR, ALOY: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, Ferroglobe's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Ferroglobe Piotroski F-Score vs Metals & Mining Industry

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Ferroglobe's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Ferroglobe's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


GSM
71GF Score
Ferroglobe PLC GSM
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -10.451 + -12.812 + -80.956 + -7.053 = $-111 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 15.613 + 20.763 + -4.284 + -5.566 = $27 Mil.
Revenue was 386.862 + 311.698 + 329.382 + 347.745 = $1,376 Mil.
Gross Profit was 115.349 + 111.331 + 38.641 + 107.656 = $373 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(1540.498 + 1660.887 + 1541.377 + 1415.48 + 1521.092) / 5 = $1535.8668 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $1,540 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $115 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $760 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $532 Mil.
Net Income was -66.482 + 18.814 + -28.133 + -66.482 = $-142 Mil.

Revenue was 307.179 + 433.533 + 367.505 + 307.179 = $1,415 Mil.
Gross Profit was 51.318 + 159.572 + 97.721 + 51.318 = $360 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(1638.866 + 1670.585 + 1638.934 + 1472.447 + 1540.498) / 5 = $1592.266 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $1,639 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $92 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $794 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $479 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ferroglobe's current Net Income (TTM) was -111. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ferroglobe's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 27. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-111.272/1540.498
=-0.07223119

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-142.283/1638.866
=-0.08681796

Ferroglobe's return on assets of this year was -0.07223119. Ferroglobe's return on assets of last year was -0.08681796. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Ferroglobe's current Net Income (TTM) was -111. Ferroglobe's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 27. ==> 27 > -111 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=114.85/1535.8668
=0.07477862

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=92.065/1592.266
=0.05782011

Ferroglobe's gearing of this year was 0.07477862. Ferroglobe's gearing of last year was 0.05782011. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=760.175/532.033
=1.42881175

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=794.398/478.728
=1.65939323

Ferroglobe's current ratio of this year was 1.42881175. Ferroglobe's current ratio of last year was 1.65939323. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Ferroglobe's number of shares in issue this year was 188.286. Ferroglobe's number of shares in issue last year was 187.008. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=372.977/1375.687
=0.27112054

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=359.929/1415.396
=0.25429562

Ferroglobe's gross margin of this year was 0.27112054. Ferroglobe's gross margin of last year was 0.25429562. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=1375.687/1540.498
=0.89301447

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=1415.396/1638.866
=0.86364352

Ferroglobe's asset turnover of this year was 0.89301447. Ferroglobe's asset turnover of last year was 0.86364352. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+1+1+0+0+0+1+1
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ferroglobe has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Ferroglobe (GSM) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Ferroglobe and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Ferroglobe's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Ferroglobe ranks #351 out of 2510 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, placing it in the top 14%.
Is Ferroglobe's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Ferroglobe's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Metals & Mining industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Ferroglobe's value of 5 is 66.7% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Ferroglobe ranks #351 out of 2510 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Ferroglobe has a GF Score™ of 71/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Ferroglobe's Piotroski F-Score compare to NB and TMCR?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Ferroglobe ranks #351 out of 2510 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Ferroglobe in the top 14% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Ferroglobe's value of 5 is 66.7% above this benchmark. Historically, Ferroglobe's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 3.00, Ferroglobe has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Metals & Mining companies is 3.00, based on 2,510 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Ferroglobe's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 66.7% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Ferroglobe and its competitors. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Ferroglobe's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Ferroglobe stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Ferroglobe (GSM) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $4.13, compared to a current price of $3.58 — trading 13.4% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 66.7% above the Metals & Mining industry median of 3.00. Ferroglobe's overall GF Score™ is 71/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Ferroglobe (GSM), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Ferroglobe (GSM) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Ferroglobe stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $3.58 is trading 13.4% below its estimated GF Value™ of $4.13. GuruFocus considers Ferroglobe to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for GSM:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: $4.13 vs. price of $3.58 (13.4% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 71/100 with 2 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 66.7% above the Metals & Mining median (#351 of 2510)

No single metric tells the full story. See the GSM stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Ferroglobe Business Description

Other Exchanges 5FG:Germany
Address 13 Chesterfield Street, London, GBR, W1J 5JN
Ferroglobe PLC provides silicon-based alloys and specialty metals. It produces silicon metal and silicon and manganese-based alloy, serving customers in the specialty chemical, aluminum, solar, steel, and ductile iron foundry industries. The company's operating segments include Canada - Silicon Metals, Canada - Silicon Alloys, U.S. - Silicon Metals, U.S. - Silicon Alloys, Europe - Manganese Alloys, Europe - Silicon Metals, Europe - Silicon Alloys, South Africa - Silicon Metals, South Africa - Silicon Alloys, and Other segments. The primary raw materials the company uses to produce its electrometallurgy products include its coal and quartz mining operations and its silicon metal and ferroalloy production. The firm generates key revenue from Silicon metal and Manganese-based alloys.
71GF Score

Get the complete analysis for GSM

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$3.58
Price
$4.13
GF Value