HGHAF (High Arctic Energy Services) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jul. 03, 2026) — Near Median


HGHAF High Arctic Energy Services Inc HGHAF
37 GF Score
Price $0.68
GF Value $0.86
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is High Arctic Energy Services Piotroski F-Score?

High Arctic Energy Services HGHAF 37 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 03, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates HGHAF with a GF Score™ of 37/100 and a GF Value™ of $0.86 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 973 Oil & Gas companies, High Arctic Energy Services ranks better than 62.69% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

High Arctic Energy Services has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for High Arctic Energy Services's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

HGHAF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of High Arctic Energy Services was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.

High Arctic Energy Services  (OTCPK:HGHAF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


High Arctic Energy Services Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


High Arctic Energy Services Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for High Arctic Energy Services's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

High Arctic Energy Services Piotroski F-Score Chart

High Arctic Energy Services Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 7.00 4.00 5.00 6.00

High Arctic Energy Services Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 5.00

HGHAF vs SLB, BKR, HAL: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services subindustry, High Arctic Energy Services's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


High Arctic Energy Services Piotroski F-Score vs Oil & Gas Industry

For the Oil & Gas industry and Energy sector, High Arctic Energy Services's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where High Arctic Energy Services's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


HGHAF
37GF Score
High Arctic Energy Services Inc HGHAF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.216 + 0.673 + -0.116 + 0.623 = $0.96 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.349 + 0.398 + 0.074 + 0.594 = $0.72 Mil.
Revenue was 1.749 + 2.118 + 2.164 + 1.993 = $8.02 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.475 + 0.745 + 0.468 + 0.491 = $2.18 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(20.89 + 21.038 + 21.622 + 21.662 + 21.852) / 5 = $21.4128 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $20.89 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $2.74 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $5.77 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $2.31 Mil.
Net Income was -1.278 + 20.096 + -0.502 + -0.084 = $18.23 Mil.

Revenue was 1.848 + 1.85 + 1.715 + 1.626 = $7.04 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.363 + 0.561 + 0.313 + 0.488 = $1.73 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(95.717 + 88.284 + 24.344 + 21.666 + 20.89) / 5 = $50.1802 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $95.72 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $2.80 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $4.68 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $2.45 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

High Arctic Energy Services's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.96. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

High Arctic Energy Services's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.72. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=0.964/20.89
=0.04614648

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=18.232/95.717
=0.19047818

High Arctic Energy Services's return on assets of this year was 0.04614648. High Arctic Energy Services's return on assets of last year was 0.19047818. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

High Arctic Energy Services's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.96. High Arctic Energy Services's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.72. ==> 0.72 <= 0.96 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=2.741/21.4128
=0.12800755

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=2.799/50.1802
=0.05577897

High Arctic Energy Services's gearing of this year was 0.12800755. High Arctic Energy Services's gearing of last year was 0.05577897. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=5.767/2.309
=2.49761802

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4.679/2.451
=1.90901673

High Arctic Energy Services's current ratio of this year was 2.49761802. High Arctic Energy Services's current ratio of last year was 1.90901673. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

High Arctic Energy Services's number of shares in issue this year was 12.697. High Arctic Energy Services's number of shares in issue last year was 12.523. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2.179/8.024
=0.27156032

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1.725/7.039
=0.24506322

High Arctic Energy Services's gross margin of this year was 0.27156032. High Arctic Energy Services's gross margin of last year was 0.24506322. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=8.024/20.89
=0.38410723

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=7.039/95.717
=0.07353971

High Arctic Energy Services's asset turnover of this year was 0.38410723. High Arctic Energy Services's asset turnover of last year was 0.07353971. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+0+0+1+0+1+1
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

High Arctic Energy Services has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
High Arctic Energy Services (HGHAF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jul. 03, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on High Arctic Energy Services and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, High Arctic Energy Services' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, High Arctic Energy Services ranks #363 out of 973 companies in the Oil & Gas industry, placing it in the top 37.3%.
Is High Arctic Energy Services' Piotroski F-Score too high?
High Arctic Energy Services' current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 8.00. The Oil & Gas industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. High Arctic Energy Services' value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, High Arctic Energy Services ranks #363 out of 973 companies in the Oil & Gas industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, High Arctic Energy Services has a GF Score™ of 37/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does High Arctic Energy Services' Piotroski F-Score compare to SLB and BKR?
According to the Oil & Gas industry distribution chart, High Arctic Energy Services ranks #363 out of 973 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts High Arctic Energy Services in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. High Arctic Energy Services' value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, High Arctic Energy Services' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, High Arctic Energy Services has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Oil & Gas company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Oil & Gas companies is 5.00, based on 973 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. High Arctic Energy Services's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on High Arctic Energy Services and its competitors. For the Oil & Gas industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. High Arctic Energy Services's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is High Arctic Energy Services stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, High Arctic Energy Services (HGHAF) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $0.86, compared to a current price of $0.68 — trading 20.9% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Oil & Gas industry median of 5.00. High Arctic Energy Services' overall GF Score™ is 37/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For High Arctic Energy Services (HGHAF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 03, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is High Arctic Energy Services (HGHAF) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, High Arctic Energy Services stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $0.68 is trading 20.9% below its estimated GF Value™ of $0.86. GuruFocus considers High Arctic Energy Services to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for HGHAF:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: $0.86 vs. price of $0.68 (20.9% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 37/100 with 3 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Oil & Gas median (#363 of 973)

No single metric tells the full story. See the HGHAF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


High Arctic Energy Services Business Description

Industry EnergyOil & Gas
Other Exchanges HWO:Canada
Address Calgary Place I, 330 -5th Avenue SW, Suite 2350, Calgary, AB, CAN, T2P 0L4
High Arctic Energy Services Inc is engaged in providing contract drilling, well servicing, completion services, equipment rentals, and other oilfield services to the oil and natural gas industry in Papua New Guinea and Canada. The operating segments of the company are the Drilling Services segment, which consists of drilling services; the Production Services segment, which consists of well servicing and snubbing services and the Rental Services segment consists of High Arctic's oilfield rental equipment of pressure control and other oilfield equipment to exploration and production companies in Canada. The Rental Services segment generates the majority company's revenue.
37GF Score

Get the complete analysis for HGHAF

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$0.68
Price
$0.86
GF Value