HGRAF (Hydrograph Clean Power) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jul. 05, 2026) — Near Median


HGRAF Hydrograph Clean Power Inc HGRAF
28 GF Score
Price $3.54
! 1 Warning Sign
View Full Analysis

What is Hydrograph Clean Power Piotroski F-Score?

Hydrograph Clean Power HGRAF -5.09% 28 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jul. 05, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates HGRAF with a GF Score™ of 28/100. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 1,562 Chemicals companies, Hydrograph Clean Power ranks worse than 65.04% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Hydrograph Clean Power has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Hydrograph Clean Power's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

HGRAF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 5
Current: 4

During the past 6 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Hydrograph Clean Power was 5. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Hydrograph Clean Power  (OTCPK:HGRAF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Hydrograph Clean Power Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Hydrograph Clean Power Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Hydrograph Clean Power's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Hydrograph Clean Power Piotroski F-Score Chart

Hydrograph Clean Power Annual Data
Trend Sep20 Sep21 Sep22 Sep23 Sep24 Sep25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A 3.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Hydrograph Clean Power Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00

HGRAF vs LIN, SHW, ECL: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Specialty Chemicals subindustry, Hydrograph Clean Power's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Hydrograph Clean Power Piotroski F-Score vs Chemicals Industry

For the Chemicals industry and Basic Materials sector, Hydrograph Clean Power's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Hydrograph Clean Power's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


HGRAF
28GF Score
Hydrograph Clean Power Inc HGRAF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -1.463 + -4.512 + -3.154 + -3.82 = $-12.95 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -1.272 + -1.523 + -2.485 + -2.325 = $-7.61 Mil.
Revenue was 0.019 + 0.001 + 0.02 + 0.051 = $0.09 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.006 + -0.027 + -0.035 + 0.012 = $-0.04 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(6.688 + 6.275 + 13.541 + 27.122 + 50.839) / 5 = $20.893 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $6.69 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1.15 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $43.56 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1.38 Mil.
Net Income was -1.278 + -1.636 + -1.095 + -1.079 = $-5.09 Mil.

Revenue was 0.002 + -0.002 + 0 + 0.023 = $0.02 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.009 + -0.043 + -0.002 + 0.017 = $-0.04 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(5.363 + 7.08 + 5.404 + 6.92 + 6.688) / 5 = $6.291 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $5.36 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.11 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2.31 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.32 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Hydrograph Clean Power's current Net Income (TTM) was -12.95. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Hydrograph Clean Power's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -7.61. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-12.949/6.688
=-1.93615431

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-5.088/5.363
=-0.94872273

Hydrograph Clean Power's return on assets of this year was -1.93615431. Hydrograph Clean Power's return on assets of last year was -0.94872273. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Hydrograph Clean Power's current Net Income (TTM) was -12.95. Hydrograph Clean Power's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -7.61. ==> -7.61 > -12.95 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=1.152/20.893
=0.05513808

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0.105/6.291
=0.01669051

Hydrograph Clean Power's gearing of this year was 0.05513808. Hydrograph Clean Power's gearing of last year was 0.01669051. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=43.559/1.383
=31.49602314

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2.308/0.323
=7.14551084

Hydrograph Clean Power's current ratio of this year was 31.49602314. Hydrograph Clean Power's current ratio of last year was 7.14551084. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Hydrograph Clean Power's number of shares in issue this year was 342.756. Hydrograph Clean Power's number of shares in issue last year was 256.966. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-0.044/0.091
=-0.48351648

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-0.037/0.023
=-1.60869565

Hydrograph Clean Power's gross margin of this year was -0.48351648. Hydrograph Clean Power's gross margin of last year was -1.60869565. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=0.091/6.688
=0.01360646

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=0.023/5.363
=0.00428864

Hydrograph Clean Power's asset turnover of this year was 0.01360646. Hydrograph Clean Power's asset turnover of last year was 0.00428864. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+1+0+1+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Hydrograph Clean Power has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Hydrograph Clean Power (HGRAF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jul. 05, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Hydrograph Clean Power and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Hydrograph Clean Power's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Hydrograph Clean Power ranks #1016 out of 1562 companies in the Chemicals industry, placing it in the top 65%.
Is Hydrograph Clean Power's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Hydrograph Clean Power's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is near median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 5.00. The Chemicals industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Hydrograph Clean Power's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Hydrograph Clean Power ranks #1016 out of 1562 companies in the Chemicals industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Hydrograph Clean Power has a GF Score™ of 28/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Hydrograph Clean Power's Piotroski F-Score compare to LIN and SHW?
According to the Chemicals industry distribution chart, Hydrograph Clean Power ranks #1016 out of 1562 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Hydrograph Clean Power in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Hydrograph Clean Power's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Hydrograph Clean Power's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Hydrograph Clean Power has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Chemicals company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Chemicals companies is 5.00, based on 1,562 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Hydrograph Clean Power's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Hydrograph Clean Power and its competitors. For the Chemicals industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Hydrograph Clean Power's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Hydrograph Clean Power stock overvalued right now?
Hydrograph Clean Power (HGRAF) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 20% below the Chemicals industry median of 5.00. Hydrograph Clean Power's overall GF Score™ is 28/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Hydrograph Clean Power (HGRAF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jul. 05, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Hydrograph Clean Power Business Description

Other Exchanges M98:GermanyHG:Canada
Address 1199 West Hastings Street, Suite 1100, Vancouver, BC, CAN, V6E 3T5
Hydrograph Clean Power Inc is engaged in the acquisition and development of graphene and hydrogen-related products and services. The company's products include Fractal graphene and Reactive Graphene.
28GF Score

Get the complete analysis for HGRAF

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$3.54
Price