China Asia Valley Group (HKSE:00063) Piotroski F-Score: 7 (As of Jul. 24, 2026) — 17% Above Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is China Asia Valley Group Piotroski F-Score?

China Asia Valley Group HKSE:00063 +19.44% Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jul. 24, 2026, which is 17% above its 10-year median of 6.00. The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,752 Real Estate companies, China Asia Valley Group ranks better than 93.09% on this metric.

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China Asia Valley Group has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for China Asia Valley Group's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

HKSE:00063' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 6   Max: 9
Current: 7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of China Asia Valley Group was 9. The lowest was 3. And the median was 6.

China Asia Valley Group  (HKSE:00063) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


China Asia Valley Group Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


China Asia Valley Group Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for China Asia Valley Group's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

China Asia Valley Group Piotroski F-Score Chart

China Asia Valley Group Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 5.00 9.00 4.00 7.00

China Asia Valley Group Semi-Annual Data
Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 9.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 7.00

HKSE:00063 vs CBRE, BEKE, JLL: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Real Estate Services subindustry, China Asia Valley Group's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


China Asia Valley Group Piotroski F-Score vs Real Estate Industry

For the Real Estate industry and Real Estate sector, China Asia Valley Group's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where China Asia Valley Group's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was HK$10.2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was HK$91.9 Mil.
Revenue was HK$156.6 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$128.9 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was (1075.264 + 1072.675) / 2 = HK$1073.9695 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was HK$1,075.3 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$245.3 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$96.8 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$270.4 Mil.
Net Income was HK$2.6 Mil.

Revenue was HK$134.7 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$97.4 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was (598.619 + 1075.264) / 2 = HK$836.9415 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was HK$598.6 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$288.5 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$69.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$263.4 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China Asia Valley Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 10.2. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China Asia Valley Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 91.9. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=10.191/1075.264
=0.00947767

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=2.565/598.619
=0.00428486

China Asia Valley Group's return on assets of this year was 0.00947767. China Asia Valley Group's return on assets of last year was 0.00428486. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

China Asia Valley Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 10.2. China Asia Valley Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 91.9. ==> 91.9 > 10.2 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=245.279/1073.9695
=0.22838544

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=288.472/836.9415
=0.34467403

China Asia Valley Group's gearing of this year was 0.22838544. China Asia Valley Group's gearing of last year was 0.34467403. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=96.787/270.414
=0.35792156

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=69.5/263.395
=0.26386226

China Asia Valley Group's current ratio of this year was 0.35792156. China Asia Valley Group's current ratio of last year was 0.26386226. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

China Asia Valley Group's number of shares in issue this year was 6352.702. China Asia Valley Group's number of shares in issue last year was 5469.302. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=128.878/156.589
=0.82303355

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=97.392/134.68
=0.72313632

China Asia Valley Group's gross margin of this year was 0.82303355. China Asia Valley Group's gross margin of last year was 0.72313632. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=156.589/1075.264
=0.14562842

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=134.68/598.619
=0.22498451

China Asia Valley Group's asset turnover of this year was 0.14562842. China Asia Valley Group's asset turnover of last year was 0.22498451. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1+0
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China Asia Valley Group has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 7 mean?
China Asia Valley Group (HKSE:00063) has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 as of Jul. 24, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on China Asia Valley Group and its competitors. This is 17% above median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, China Asia Valley Group's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 9.00. According to the industry distribution chart, China Asia Valley Group ranks #121 out of 1752 companies in the Real Estate industry, placing it in the top 6.9%.
Is China Asia Valley Group's Piotroski F-Score too high?
China Asia Valley Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 9.00. The Real Estate industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. China Asia Valley Group's value of 7 is 40% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, China Asia Valley Group ranks #121 out of 1752 companies in the Real Estate industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers.
How does China Asia Valley Group's Piotroski F-Score compare to CBRE and BEKE?
According to the Real Estate industry distribution chart, China Asia Valley Group ranks #121 out of 1752 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places China Asia Valley Group in the top 7% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. China Asia Valley Group's value of 7 is 40% above this benchmark. Historically, China Asia Valley Group's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 9.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, China Asia Valley Group has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Real Estate company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Real Estate companies is 5.00, based on 1,752 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. China Asia Valley Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 40% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on China Asia Valley Group and its competitors. For the Real Estate industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. China Asia Valley Group's current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 17% above median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is China Asia Valley Group stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, China Asia Valley Group (HKSE:00063) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is HK$0.13, compared to a current price of HK$0.04 — trading 66.9% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 40% above the Real Estate industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For China Asia Valley Group (HKSE:00063), the current Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jul. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

China Asia Valley Group Business Description

Address 30 Harbour Road, Rooms 1237-1240, 12th Floor, Sun Hung Kai Centre, Wanchai, HKG
China Asia Valley Group Ltd is an investment holding company. It operates through four segments: Property investment, Horticultural services and sale of plants, Property management and other related services, and Construction services. The company generates a majority of its revenue from the Property management and other related services segment. Geographically, it derives key revenue from the People's Republic of China and the rest from Hong Kong.