Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co (HKSE:01392) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Aug. 27, 2026) — Near Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

HKSE:01392 Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Ltd HKSE:01392
17 GF Score
Price HK$25.54
! 4 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Piotroski F-Score?

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co HKSE:01392 -1.54% 17 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Aug. 27, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates HKSE:01392 with a GF Score™ of 17/100. The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,745 Software companies, Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co ranks worse than 59.96% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

HKSE:01392' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 4   Max: 4
Current: 4

During the past 3 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co was 4. The lowest was 4. And the median was 4.

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co  (HKSE:01392) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Piotroski F-Score Chart

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Annual Data
Trend Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A 4.00

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Semi-Annual Data
Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score N/A N/A 4.00

HKSE:01392 vs MSFT, ORCL, PLTR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Software - Infrastructure subindustry, Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


HKSE:01392
17GF Score
Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Ltd HKSE:01392
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was HK$32.4 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was HK$-143.5 Mil.
Revenue was HK$738.5 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$165.0 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was (432.666 + 799.702) / 2 = HK$616.184 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was HK$432.7 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$61.6 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$630.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$338.0 Mil.
Net Income was HK$43.1 Mil.

Revenue was HK$557.9 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$104.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was (285.434 + 432.666) / 2 = HK$359.05 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was HK$285.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$8.4 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$322.7 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$174.0 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's current Net Income (TTM) was 32.4. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -143.5. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=32.428/432.666
=0.07494927

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=43.147/285.434
=0.15116279

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's return on assets of this year was 0.07494927. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's return on assets of last year was 0.15116279. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's current Net Income (TTM) was 32.4. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -143.5. ==> -143.5 <= 32.4 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=61.575/616.184
=0.09992957

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=8.442/359.05
=0.02351205

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's gearing of this year was 0.09992957. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's gearing of last year was 0.02351205. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=630.495/337.999
=1.86537534

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=322.677/173.986
=1.85461474

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's current ratio of this year was 1.86537534. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's current ratio of last year was 1.85461474. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's number of shares in issue this year was 774.208. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's number of shares in issue last year was 774.208. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=165.037/738.53
=0.22346689

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=104.812/557.931
=0.18785836

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's gross margin of this year was 0.22346689. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's gross margin of last year was 0.18785836. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=738.53/432.666
=1.70692867

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=557.931/285.434
=1.95467604

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's asset turnover of this year was 1.70692867. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's asset turnover of last year was 1.95467604. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+0+1+1+1+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co (HKSE:01392) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Aug. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 4.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co ranks #1646 out of 2745 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 60%.
Is Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is near median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 4.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co ranks #1646 out of 2745 companies in the Software industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co has a GF Score™ of 17/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's Piotroski F-Score compare to MSFT and ORCL?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co ranks #1646 out of 2745 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 4.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,745 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co stock overvalued right now?
Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co (HKSE:01392) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 20% below the Software industry median of 5.00. Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co's overall GF Score™ is 17/100 with 4 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co (HKSE:01392), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Aug. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Business Description

Address Xixiang Street, Bao’an District, 3rd Floor, Building 8, Taihua Wutong Industrial Park, Gushu Development Zone, Shenzhen, CHN
Shenzhen HQVT Technology Co Ltd operates as a multispectral AI technology enterprise in China. The company and its subsidiaries are principally engaged in Multispectral AI Modules, Multispectral AI Perception Terminals, and Multispectral AI Large Model Services. The majority of the company's revenue is derived from the Multispectral AI Large Model Services, which integrate multispectral data with domain-specific AI to support training, compression, and secure on-device deployment. It serves various industries, including electronic products, software and information technology services, IDC, intelligent driving systems, telecommunication operators, IoT, system integration, and construction. Geographically, it generates the maximum revenue from Mainland China.
17GF Score

Get the complete analysis for HKSE:01392

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

HK$25.54
Price