KF (Korea Fund) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Aug. 13, 2026) — 40% Below Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

KF Korea Fund Inc KF
37 GF Score
Price $62.82
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Korea Fund Piotroski F-Score?

Korea Fund KF +4.68% 37 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Aug. 13, 2026, which is 40% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates KF with a GF Score™ of 37/100. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,590 Asset Management companies, Korea Fund ranks worse than 78.24% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Korea Fund has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Korea Fund's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

KF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 3

During the past 8 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Korea Fund was 7. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

Korea Fund  (NYSE:KF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Korea Fund Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Korea Fund Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Korea Fund's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Korea Fund Piotroski F-Score Chart

Korea Fund Annual Data
Trend Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Jun22 Jun23 Jun24 Jun25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 3.00

Korea Fund Semi-Annual Data
Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 6.00 0.00 3.00 0.00

KF vs GLO, KWY, FCT: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Asset Management subindustry, Korea Fund's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Korea Fund Piotroski F-Score vs Asset Management Industry

For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, Korea Fund's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Korea Fund's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


KF
37GF Score
Korea Fund Inc KF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun25) TTM:Last Year (Jun24) TTM:
Net Income was $8.60 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $0.00 Mil.
Revenue was $10.18 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun24)
to the end of this year (Jun25) was (140.147 + 129.653) / 2 = $134.9 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun24) was $140.15 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was $129.65 Mil.
Total Liabilities was $1.30 Mil.
Net Income was $10.52 Mil.

Revenue was $11.97 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun23)
to the end of last year (Jun24) was (131.472 + 140.147) / 2 = $135.8095 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun23) was $131.47 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was $140.15 Mil.
Total Liabilities was $1.03 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Korea Fund's current Net Income (TTM) was 8.60. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Korea Fund's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.00. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun24)
=8.602/140.147
=0.06137841

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun23)
=10.516/131.472
=0.07998661

Korea Fund's return on assets of this year was 0.06137841. Korea Fund's return on assets of last year was 0.07998661. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Korea Fund's current Net Income (TTM) was 8.60. Korea Fund's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.00. ==> 0.00 <= 8.60 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun24 to Jun25
=0/134.9
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Jun24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun23 to Jun24
=0/135.8095
=0

Korea Fund's gearing of this year was 0. Korea Fund's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun25)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=129.653/1.296
=100.04089506

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun24)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=140.147/1.027
=136.46251217

Korea Fund's current ratio of this year was 100.04089506. Korea Fund's current ratio of last year was 136.46251217. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Korea Fund's number of shares in issue this year was 3.569. Korea Fund's number of shares in issue last year was 4.846. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.

Net Margin (This Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=8.602/10.175
=0.84540541

Net Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=10.516/11.97
=0.87852966

Korea Fund's net margin of this year was 0.84540541. Korea Fund's net margin of last year was 0.87852966. ==> Last year's net margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun24)
=10.175/140.147
=0.07260234

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun23)
=11.97/131.472
=0.091046

Korea Fund's asset turnover of this year was 0.07260234. Korea Fund's asset turnover of last year was 0.091046. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+1+0+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Korea Fund has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Korea Fund (KF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Aug. 13, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Korea Fund and its competitors. This is 40% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Korea Fund's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Korea Fund ranks #1244 out of 1590 companies in the Asset Management industry, placing it in the top 78.2%.
Is Korea Fund's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Korea Fund's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 7.00. The Asset Management industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Korea Fund's value of 3 is 40% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Korea Fund ranks #1244 out of 1590 companies in the Asset Management industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Korea Fund has a GF Score™ of 37/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Korea Fund's Piotroski F-Score compare to GLO and KWY?
According to the Asset Management industry distribution chart, Korea Fund ranks #1244 out of 1590 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Korea Fund in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Korea Fund's value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Korea Fund's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Korea Fund has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Asset Management company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Asset Management companies is 5.00, based on 1,590 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Korea Fund's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Korea Fund and its competitors. For the Asset Management industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Korea Fund's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Korea Fund stock overvalued right now?
Korea Fund (KF) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 3. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 40% below the Asset Management industry median of 5.00. Korea Fund's overall GF Score™ is 37/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Korea Fund (KF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Aug. 13, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Korea Fund Business Description

Address 60 Victoria Embankment, London, GBR, EC4Y 0JP
Korea Fund Inc is a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company. Its investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation through investment in securities, equity securities, of Korean companies. Its portfolio consists of the different sectors such as the auto components, banks, beverages, chemicals, aerospace and defense, insurance, machinery, and Others.
37GF Score

Get the complete analysis for KF

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$62.82
Price