LAWR (Robot Consulting Co) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Aug. 01, 2026) — 20% Below Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

LAWR Robot Consulting Co Ltd LAWR
19 GF Score
Price $3.75
! 4 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Robot Consulting Co Piotroski F-Score?

Robot Consulting Co LAWR 19 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Aug. 01, 2026, which is 20% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates LAWR with a GF Score™ of 19/100. The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Robot Consulting Co has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Robot Consulting Co's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

LAWR' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 5   Max: 5
Current: 4

During the past 4 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Robot Consulting Co was 5. The lowest was 4. And the median was 5.

Robot Consulting Co  (NAS:LAWR) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Robot Consulting Co Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Robot Consulting Co Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Robot Consulting Co's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Robot Consulting Co Piotroski F-Score Chart

Robot Consulting Co Annual Data
Trend Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A 5.00 4.00

Robot Consulting Co Semi-Annual Data
Mar22 Sep22 Mar23 Sep23 Mar24 Sep24 Mar25 Sep25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial 0.00 5.00 0.00 4.00 0.00

LAWR vs ROMA, RGP, FORR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Consulting Services subindustry, Robot Consulting Co's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Robot Consulting Co Piotroski F-Score vs Business Services Industry

For the Business Services industry and Industrials sector, Robot Consulting Co's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Robot Consulting Co's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


LAWR
19GF Score
Robot Consulting Co Ltd LAWR
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar25) TTM:Last Year (Mar24) TTM:
Net Income was $-3.59 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $-1.90 Mil.
Revenue was $4.53 Mil.
Gross Profit was $4.51 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar24)
to the end of this year (Mar25) was (4.963 + 2.106) / 2 = $3.5345 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar24) was $4.96 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1.86 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $3.53 Mil.
Net Income was $-4.42 Mil.

Revenue was $4.63 Mil.
Gross Profit was $4.49 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar23)
to the end of last year (Mar24) was (4.741 + 4.963) / 2 = $4.852 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar23) was $4.74 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $4.74 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $3.82 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Robot Consulting Co's current Net Income (TTM) was -3.59. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Robot Consulting Co's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -1.90. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-3.587/4.963
=-0.72274834

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar23)
=-4.418/4.741
=-0.93187091

Robot Consulting Co's return on assets of this year was -0.72274834. Robot Consulting Co's return on assets of last year was -0.93187091. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Robot Consulting Co's current Net Income (TTM) was -3.59. Robot Consulting Co's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -1.90. ==> -1.90 > -3.59 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0.003/3.5345
=0.00084878

Gearing (Last Year: Mar24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar23 to Mar24
=0.002/4.852
=0.0004122

Robot Consulting Co's gearing of this year was 0.00084878. Robot Consulting Co's gearing of last year was 0.0004122. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1.862/3.529
=0.52762822

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4.735/3.817
=1.24050301

Robot Consulting Co's current ratio of this year was 0.52762822. Robot Consulting Co's current ratio of last year was 1.24050301. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Robot Consulting Co's number of shares in issue this year was 45.96. Robot Consulting Co's number of shares in issue last year was 45.96. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=4.506/4.532
=0.99426302

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=4.494/4.626
=0.97146563

Robot Consulting Co's gross margin of this year was 0.99426302. Robot Consulting Co's gross margin of last year was 0.97146563. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar24)
=4.532/4.963
=0.91315736

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar23)
=4.626/4.741
=0.97574351

Robot Consulting Co's asset turnover of this year was 0.91315736. Robot Consulting Co's asset turnover of last year was 0.97574351. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+1+0+0+1+1+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Robot Consulting Co has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Robot Consulting Co (LAWR) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Aug. 01, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Robot Consulting Co and its competitors. This is 20% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Robot Consulting Co's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 5.00.
Is Robot Consulting Co's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Robot Consulting Co's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 5.00. The Business Services industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Robot Consulting Co's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Overall, Robot Consulting Co has a GF Score™ of 19/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Robot Consulting Co's Piotroski F-Score compare to ROMA and RGP?
Robot Consulting Co's Piotroski F-Score of 4 can be compared against companies in the Business Services industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Robot Consulting Co's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Robot Consulting Co's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Robot Consulting Co has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Business Services company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Business Services companies is 5.00, based on 1,065 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Robot Consulting Co's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Robot Consulting Co and its competitors. For the Business Services industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Robot Consulting Co's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Robot Consulting Co stock overvalued right now?
Robot Consulting Co (LAWR) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% below the Business Services industry median of 5.00. Robot Consulting Co's overall GF Score™ is 19/100 with 4 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Robot Consulting Co (LAWR), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Aug. 01, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Robot Consulting Co Business Description

Address 5-22-6 Shinbashi, Le Graciel Building 2, 6th Floor, Minato Ward, Tokyo, JPN, 105-0005
Robot Consulting Co Ltd is a platform service provider focusing on human resource solutions intending to expand into legal technology and the metaverse. Its current Main product is Labor Robot, a cloud-based human resource management system. Labor Robot helps users track employee attendance and sales orders and journalize accounting items. Additionally, the company provides information about grant applications with MHLW, which will provide grants to small and medium-sized businesses to enhance their working conditions and employee welfare. In addition, It connects users interested in applying for grants with Certified Consultants.
19GF Score

Get the complete analysis for LAWR

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$3.75
Price