Magnolia Petroleum (LSE:MAGP) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 26, 2026) — 20% Below Median


What is Magnolia Petroleum Piotroski F-Score?

Magnolia Petroleum LSE:MAGP +50.00% Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026, which is 20% below its 10-year median of 5.00. The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Magnolia Petroleum has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Magnolia Petroleum's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

LSE:MAGP' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 5
Current: 4

During the past 9 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Magnolia Petroleum was 5. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.

Magnolia Petroleum  (LSE:MAGP) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Magnolia Petroleum Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Magnolia Petroleum Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Magnolia Petroleum's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Magnolia Petroleum Piotroski F-Score Chart

Magnolia Petroleum Annual Data
Trend Dec08 Dec09 Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only 5.00 4.00 5.00 2.00 4.00

Magnolia Petroleum Semi-Annual Data
Dec11 Jun12 Dec12 Jun13 Dec13 Jun14 Dec14 Jun15 Dec15 Jun16 Dec16 Jun17
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 0.00

LSE:MAGP vs VNRRQ, GBEYF, STSC: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Oil & Gas E&P subindustry, Magnolia Petroleum's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Magnolia Petroleum Piotroski F-Score vs Oil & Gas Industry

For the Oil & Gas industry and Energy sector, Magnolia Petroleum's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Magnolia Petroleum's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec16) TTM:Last Year (Dec15) TTM:
Net Income was £-1.24 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was £-0.35 Mil.
Revenue was £1.02 Mil.
Gross Profit was £-0.50 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec15)
to the end of this year (Dec16) was (6.822 + 5.651) / 2 = £6.2365 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec15) was £6.82 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was £0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was £0.68 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was £3.15 Mil.
Net Income was £-6.54 Mil.

Revenue was £1.33 Mil.
Gross Profit was £-0.53 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec14)
to the end of last year (Dec15) was (12.274 + 6.822) / 2 = £9.548 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec14) was £12.27 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was £2.11 Mil.
Total Current Assets was £0.73 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was £0.76 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Magnolia Petroleum's current Net Income (TTM) was -1.24. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Magnolia Petroleum's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.35. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec15)
=-1.242/6.822
=-0.18205805

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec14)
=-6.542/12.274
=-0.53299658

Magnolia Petroleum's return on assets of this year was -0.18205805. Magnolia Petroleum's return on assets of last year was -0.53299658. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Magnolia Petroleum's current Net Income (TTM) was -1.24. Magnolia Petroleum's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.35. ==> -0.35 > -1.24 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec16)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec15 to Dec16
=0/6.2365
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Dec15)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec14 to Dec15
=2.108/9.548
=0.22077922

Magnolia Petroleum's gearing of this year was 0. Magnolia Petroleum's gearing of last year was 0.22077922. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec16)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.682/3.147
=0.21671433

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec15)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.727/0.762
=0.95406824

Magnolia Petroleum's current ratio of this year was 0.21671433. Magnolia Petroleum's current ratio of last year was 0.95406824. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Magnolia Petroleum's number of shares in issue this year was 17.515. Magnolia Petroleum's number of shares in issue last year was 9.951. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-0.503/1.02
=-0.49313725

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-0.53/1.33
=-0.39849624

Magnolia Petroleum's gross margin of this year was -0.49313725. Magnolia Petroleum's gross margin of last year was -0.39849624. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec15)
=1.02/6.822
=0.14951627

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec14)
=1.33/12.274
=0.10835913

Magnolia Petroleum's asset turnover of this year was 0.14951627. Magnolia Petroleum's asset turnover of last year was 0.10835913. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+1+1+0+0+0+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Magnolia Petroleum has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Magnolia Petroleum (LSE:MAGP) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Magnolia Petroleum and its competitors. This is 20% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Magnolia Petroleum's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00.
Is Magnolia Petroleum's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Magnolia Petroleum's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 5.00. The Oil & Gas industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Magnolia Petroleum's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median.
How does Magnolia Petroleum's Piotroski F-Score compare to VNRRQ and GBEYF?
Magnolia Petroleum's Piotroski F-Score of 4 can be compared against companies in the Oil & Gas industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Magnolia Petroleum's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Magnolia Petroleum's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Magnolia Petroleum has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Oil & Gas company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Oil & Gas companies is 5.00, based on 974 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Magnolia Petroleum's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Magnolia Petroleum and its competitors. For the Oil & Gas industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Magnolia Petroleum's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Magnolia Petroleum stock overvalued right now?
Magnolia Petroleum (LSE:MAGP) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% below the Oil & Gas industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Magnolia Petroleum (LSE:MAGP), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Magnolia Petroleum Business Description

Industry EnergyOil & Gas
Address 19-21 Crawford Street, Suite 321, London, GBR, W1H 1PJ
Magnolia Petroleum PLC is an oil and gas production company. The company focuses on the acquisition, exploitation, and development of oil and gas properties located onshore in the United States. It has a diverse portfolio of revenue-generating assets including leases on the highly productive Bakken/Three Forks Sanish Formation in North Dakota and the proven Mississippi Lime and Woodford/Hunton oil formations in Oklahoma. It operates in two geographical areas, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.