Glaston Oyj (LTS:0IG1) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Aug. 05, 2026) — 40% Below Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is Glaston Oyj Piotroski F-Score?

Glaston Oyj LTS:0IG1 68 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Aug. 05, 2026, which is 40% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates LTS:0IG1 with a GF Score™ of 68/100. The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,955 Industrial Products companies, Glaston Oyj ranks worse than 82.17% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Glaston Oyj has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Glaston Oyj's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

LTS:0IG1' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Glaston Oyj was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.

Glaston Oyj  (LTS:0IG1) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Glaston Oyj Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Glaston Oyj Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Glaston Oyj's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Glaston Oyj Piotroski F-Score Chart

Glaston Oyj Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 7.00 6.00 3.00 4.00

Glaston Oyj Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 4.00 6.00 4.00 3.00

LTS:0IG1 vs GEV, ETN, PH: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Specialty Industrial Machinery subindustry, Glaston Oyj's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Glaston Oyj Piotroski F-Score vs Industrial Products Industry

For the Industrial Products industry and Industrials sector, Glaston Oyj's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Glaston Oyj's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -1.275 + 1.998 + 0.175 + 0.607 = £1.51 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 1.7 + -2.432 + 0.437 + 0.347 = £0.05 Mil.
Revenue was 43.948 + 49.073 + 42.861 + 35.462 = £171.34 Mil.
Gross Profit was 25.927 + 27.359 + 23.967 + 23.324 = £100.58 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(159.486 + 151.395 + 151.04 + 150.764 + 143.15) / 5 = £151.167 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was £159.49 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was £27.40 Mil.
Total Current Assets was £56.27 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was £52.72 Mil.
Net Income was 0.423 + 1.091 + -0.166 + 0.167 = £1.52 Mil.

Revenue was 42.219 + 46.484 + 47.046 + 43.26 = £179.01 Mil.
Gross Profit was 25.636 + 27.857 + 26.67 + 26.19 = £106.35 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(163.303 + 158.131 + 159.926 + 154.495 + 159.486) / 5 = £159.0682 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was £163.30 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was £22.93 Mil.
Total Current Assets was £69.70 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was £72.55 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Glaston Oyj's current Net Income (TTM) was 1.51. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Glaston Oyj's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.05. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=1.505/159.486
=0.00943656

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=1.515/163.303
=0.00927723

Glaston Oyj's return on assets of this year was 0.00943656. Glaston Oyj's return on assets of last year was 0.00927723. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Glaston Oyj's current Net Income (TTM) was 1.51. Glaston Oyj's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.05. ==> 0.05 <= 1.51 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=27.399/151.167
=0.18124988

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=22.927/159.0682
=0.14413315

Glaston Oyj's gearing of this year was 0.18124988. Glaston Oyj's gearing of last year was 0.14413315. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=56.272/52.717
=1.06743555

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=69.702/72.547
=0.96078404

Glaston Oyj's current ratio of this year was 1.06743555. Glaston Oyj's current ratio of last year was 0.96078404. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Glaston Oyj's number of shares in issue this year was 0. Glaston Oyj's number of shares in issue last year was 0. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=100.577/171.344
=0.58698875

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=106.353/179.009
=0.59412097

Glaston Oyj's gross margin of this year was 0.58698875. Glaston Oyj's gross margin of last year was 0.59412097. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=171.344/159.486
=1.07435135

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=179.009/163.303
=1.09617705

Glaston Oyj's asset turnover of this year was 1.07435135. Glaston Oyj's asset turnover of last year was 1.09617705. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+0+0+1+1+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Glaston Oyj has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Glaston Oyj (LTS:0IG1) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Aug. 05, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Glaston Oyj and its competitors. This is 40% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Glaston Oyj's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Glaston Oyj ranks #2428 out of 2955 companies in the Industrial Products industry, placing it in the top 82.2%.
Is Glaston Oyj's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Glaston Oyj's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 7.00. The Industrial Products industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Glaston Oyj's value of 3 is 40% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Glaston Oyj ranks #2428 out of 2955 companies in the Industrial Products industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Glaston Oyj has a GF Score™ of 68/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Glaston Oyj's Piotroski F-Score compare to GEV and ETN?
According to the Industrial Products industry distribution chart, Glaston Oyj ranks #2428 out of 2955 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Glaston Oyj in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Glaston Oyj's value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Glaston Oyj's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Glaston Oyj has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Industrial Products company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Industrial Products companies is 5.00, based on 2,955 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Glaston Oyj's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Glaston Oyj and its competitors. For the Industrial Products industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Glaston Oyj's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Glaston Oyj stock overvalued right now?
Glaston Oyj (LTS:0IG1) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 3. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 40% below the Industrial Products industry median of 5.00. Glaston Oyj's overall GF Score™ is 68/100 with 4 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Glaston Oyj (LTS:0IG1), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Aug. 05, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Glaston Oyj Business Description

Other Exchanges GLA1V:FinlandKRY:Germany
Address Lonnrotinkatu 11, Helsinki, FIN, 00120
Glaston Oyj is a company engaged in developing and selling glass processing machinery. Its business includes a range of heat treatment machines, maintenance, upgrade, and modernization services, and spare parts for glass flat tempering, bending, bending tempering, and laminating. It also offers digital services, such as glass processing machine remote monitoring and fault analysis services, and consulting and engineering services. The company provides solutions to various industries including Architectural, Appliances, Automotive and Solar.