ForFarmers NVLTS:0RHZ 63 Piotroski F-Score is 8 as of Jun. 28, 2026, which is 33% above its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates LTS:0RHZ with a GF Score™ of 63/100 and a GF Value™ of €3.17 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,910 Consumer Packaged Goods companies, ForFarmers NV ranks better than 97.64% on this metric.
Good Sign:
Piotroski F-Score is 8, indicates a very healthy situation.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
ForFarmers NV has an F-score of 8. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.
The historical rank and industry rank for ForFarmers NV's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
LTS:0RHZ'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5 Med: 6 Max: 8
Current: 8
During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of ForFarmers NV was 8. The lowest was 5. And the median was 6.
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
ForFarmers NV Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
ForFarmers NV Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for ForFarmers NV's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
LTS:0RHZ vs KHC, GIS, JBS: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Packaged Foods subindustry, ForFarmers NV's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
ForFarmers NV Piotroski F-Score vs Consumer Packaged Goods Industry
For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry and Consumer Defensive sector, ForFarmers NV's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where ForFarmers NV's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
ForFarmers NV's current Net Income (TTM) was 50.
==> Positive ==> Score 1.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
ForFarmers NV's return on assets of this year was 0.05296678. ForFarmers NV's return on assets of last year was 0.03734539.
==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
ForFarmers NV's gearing of this year was 0.06742996. ForFarmers NV's gearing of last year was 0.13550956.
==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
ForFarmers NV's current ratio of this year was 1.08756395. ForFarmers NV's current ratio of last year was 1.11496531.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
ForFarmers NV's number of shares in issue this year was 88.625. ForFarmers NV's number of shares in issue last year was 88.781.
==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
ForFarmers NV's gross margin of this year was 0.19384098. ForFarmers NV's gross margin of last year was 0.18876789.
==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
ForFarmers NV's asset turnover of this year was 3.34688462. ForFarmers NV's asset turnover of last year was 3.2655804.
==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
1
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
1
+
1
+
1
=
8
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
ForFarmers NV has an F-score of 8. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.
ForFarmers NV (LTS:0RHZ) has a Piotroski F-Score of 8 as of Jun. 28, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on ForFarmers NV and its competitors. This is 33% above median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, ForFarmers NV's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 5.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, ForFarmers NV ranks #45 out of 1910 companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, placing it in the top 2.4%.
Is ForFarmers NV's Piotroski F-Score too high?
ForFarmers NV's current Piotroski F-Score of 8 is 33% above median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 5.00 to a high of 8.00. The Consumer Packaged Goods industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. ForFarmers NV's value of 8 is 60% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, ForFarmers NV ranks #45 out of 1910 companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, ForFarmers NV has a GF Score™ of 63/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does ForFarmers NV's Piotroski F-Score compare to KHC and GIS?
According to the Consumer Packaged Goods industry distribution chart, ForFarmers NV ranks #45 out of 1910 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places ForFarmers NV in the top 2% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. ForFarmers NV's value of 8 is 60% above this benchmark. Historically, ForFarmers NV's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 5.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, ForFarmers NV has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Consumer Packaged Goods company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Consumer Packaged Goods companies is 5.00, based on 1,910 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. ForFarmers NV's current Piotroski F-Score of 8 is 60% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on ForFarmers NV and its competitors. For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. ForFarmers NV's current Piotroski F-Score is 8, which is 33% above median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is ForFarmers NV stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, ForFarmers NV (LTS:0RHZ) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is €3.17, compared to a current price of €6.16 — trading 94.3% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 8, which is 33% above median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 60% above the Consumer Packaged Goods industry median of 5.00. ForFarmers NV's overall GF Score™ is 63/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For ForFarmers NV (LTS:0RHZ), the current Piotroski F-Score is 8 as of Jun. 28, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is ForFarmers NV (LTS:0RHZ) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, ForFarmers NV stock appears to be overvalued.
The current stock price of €6.16 is trading 94.3% above its estimated GF Value™ of €3.17.
GuruFocus considers ForFarmers NV to be Significantly Overvalued.
Key valuation signals for LTS:0RHZ:
Piotroski F-Score: 8 (33% above median its 10-year median of 6.00)
GF Value™: €3.17 vs. price of €6.16 (94.3% above fair value)
Industry Position: 60% above the Consumer Packaged Goods median (#45 of 1910)
No single metric tells the full story. See the LTS:0RHZ stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
ForFarmers NV is an animal nutrition company. Its core business is the supply of high-quality feed solutions at competitive prices for livestock farming. The Company provides compound feed, specialties, feed additives, and co-products, supported by formulation, nutrition, innovation, procurement, feed milling, logistics, and delivery, and on-farm advisory services. Feed solutions are offered for ruminants, pigs, poultry, and horses, with activities also including organic feed through Reudink and residual flows through Van Triest CirQlar. The Company operates across the Netherlands, Germany, the United Kingdom, Poland, Belgium, and other countries, with the majority of its revenue generated in the Netherlands.
63GF Score
Get the complete analysis for LTS:0RHZ
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
LTS:0RHZ has been successfully added to your 
